A letter from an Wasilla resident re: her friend Palin.

[rn79870]

We'll ignore all 5 eyewitness accounts to her dismal leadership abilities because you don't like them. Courts have convicted with less evidence.

[AZhitman]

the simple fact is that given the ubiquitous amount of information that all reflects negatively on a persons ability to serve, some of it, even a little bit of it, has to be true.

Yep... I said the same thing about BO.

[wingFeather]

Courts have convicted with less evidence.

...and courts have aquitted with MORE evidence.

OJ 2008! He didn't do it

[szh]

If you choose not to believe the carefully documented evidence that relates to a politician's inability to serve, then that's fair.

The "careful documentation" is extremely suspect. When it comes from hate sites, I do not accept their objectivity at all.

But the simple fact is that given the ubiquitous amount of information that all reflects negatively on a persons ability to serve, some of it, even a little bit of it, has to be true.

Applies to Obama too!

Z

[rn79870]

The "careful documentation" is extremely suspect. When it comes from hate sites, I do not accept their objectivity at all.

Z

What about ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN. They've reported much of it too. Are they not objective?

[szh]

What about ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN. They've reported much of it too. Are they not objective?

Many of their "reports" are just as unsubstantiated rumours so far - just less scurrilous language. No factual evidence yet.

Z

[wingFeather]

If that's the case, then it's better we find out before we vote than after

Then, to be fair, you need to get busy posting Obama's flaws. All of them. I'm sure NICO's servers have room

Then we can weigh their sins and pick the lesser of evils

[rn79870]

Isn't it interesting that the media, who publishes for profit, finds all these things in Palin's past and all we can dig up for poor lil Barry is who paid for his education. There's a message in there Ray Charles could see.

[szh]

finds all these things in Palin's past and all we can dig up for poor lil Barry is who paid for his education. There's a message in there Ray Charles could see.

No, the difference is that "we" are not posting the ridiculous personal rumours and unsubstantiated innuendo about Obama from the various hate sites.

Unlike the obsessed Anti-Palin camp.

Z

[wingFeather]

all we can dig up for poor lil Barry is who paid for his education.

Yeah, that is interesting It lets you know who they're afraid of, and who is in their pocket. They cannot stand anyone decent, and raise up slimy scumbags like Oprah Christ and Jesus Bill Clinton.

[rn79870]

No, the difference is that "we" are not posting the ridiculous personal rumours and unsubstantiated innuendo about Obama from the various hate sites.

Unlike the obsessed Anti-Palin camp.

Z

If by unsubstantiated innuendo you mean eyewitness testimonials, videos of her actions, recordings of her talking, official documents issued by her, official records of committees and other governmental agencies, other written verification, than yes, I've spread unsubstantiated innuendo.

What's interesting is that with that much smoke, you refuse to admit that there might be a little fire in there somewhere. That's how people get burned.

[szh]

The difference lies in the word "obsessed".

Z

[rn79870]

News sources are obsessed? Isn't that their job?

[szh]

News sources are obsessed? Isn't that their job?

Taken out of context, if you ignore the word "we" that I used, then yes, you could put this spin on it.

Z

[rn79870]

Psssttt. the anti-Palin camp is the press, the media and the blogs. They are the ones digging up all the bodies in her backyard.

[szh]

bodies in her backyard.

Reference, please, for any "bodies" found in her backyard. Reputable news sources only.

If not, then this is yet another complete falsehood.

Z

[rn79870]

It was clear from the meaning that it was designed for rhetorical analyses. Unlike the cited "bodies" where links were provided. It might be grandiloquent but that's part of my style.

Think of it as similar to your mudslinging comments. Can you show any mud actually being thrown. Or are you merely processing a rhetorical thought?

[szh]

The difference:

I have not accused any Democrat candidate, i.e. Biden (or Obama for that matter) of slinging mud.

But, you feel that you need to mention the Republican candidate, i.e. Palin, has bodies in her backyard.

If the distinction and difference in approach is not clear, then please feel free to ignore what I am saying here. I will not be able to explain it to you.

Z