diablo9420 wrote:yea but the engine wont be the same and doesn't the 3.3l in those things suck? at least i read it was way under powered and basically useless for a suv...
I don't think so. Perhaps the extra, what 50-70HP in the 3.5L "might" have been nice on a very rare occasion for me. Nothing really that I can recall though.
Would I buy another 99.5? Sure would . I'm currently thinking about buying a newer model year, based more on what's available with under 100K mileage. Not powertrain.
I've driven my 3.3L equipped Pathy on 2 very loaded up cross country moves now (Boston to Oregon & back). Did fine. I did install air helper springs for the return trip, but AFAIK all R50 model year stock rear springs are on the softer side.