Fred D. wrote:Im suprised no ones talking about what he wants out of the tires. Diffrent width of tires is a big factor for cornering, or better gas mileage. The stock tire are P/215/65 R15 95V I like widder tire for cornering, and off the line traction, so I 225/60/15, & since my budget doesnt allow the V rating H is like a 130mph wich is good for me.
Hmmm ... a number of things to think about.
1. The original poster sorta described what he wanted out of the car: low cost, minimal to no highway driving, stick with 15" wheels, etc. The responses have been geared to those basic criterion. Otherwise, I (among others) would have recommended that he switch wheels to a larger diameter rim and way better (and more expensive) tires!
2. Wider does not necessarily equal better cornering - particularly not as a big factor! Indeed, it is not a big factor at all when the width difference between 215/65 and 225/60 is so nominal.
Also, depending on the tire make and model, it is even possible for a "wider" tire to have a "narrower" tread width (i.e., the contact width at the ground). In other words, the design of the tire cross-section and the section width, play important roles too.
It is far more likely that the stickiness of the tire, the sidewall stiffness, the aspect ratio, etc., will be a much bigger factor for better cornering and handling than the width of the tires - again particularly true given the nominal difference between the 215/65 and the 225/60!
Specific example: On my 1995 Q45, I used to run Firestone Firehawk SZ50-EP tires, which, at 225/60-15, had a narrower tread width than the previous tires I had: Michelin Pilot XGT V4 215/65-15, but had far superior dry and wet handling (on corners too)! The SZ50-EP had the best wet weather braking and handling I have ever seen in over 30 years of driving ...
3. Yes, for more people the H rating of a tire will be entirely sufficient, while others like the added safety of construction that a V rating might bring to a tire.
So, I would say: true on that comment in your post.
But, I would separately also add that an S or T rating is unsafe for the weight of a Q, almost without regard to what the load index is (like the Firestone Indy 500 mentioned above at 98). I would strongly recommend a lower load index H or V rating over a high load index S rating, as long as the H/V tire load index was not too low (below the minimum of 95 for a Q45)!
Hence, my choice of the Michelin Exalto over the Firestone Indy 500 in my earlier post!
Z