elwesso wrote:I agree with RSI, however I would HIGHLY HIGHLY HIGHLY HIGHLY recommend you KEEP the active suspension.
If there are no leaks, your not that much more expensive than a normal suspension. $800 for a set of recharged accumulators, and $50ish for fluid. If the struts arent leaking and the system isnt COMPLETELY shot, then all you have is rubber components after that.
What you get is a ride that is second to none, and a suspension only compared to newish MB S600!!! A 100k car!!!!
From my personal experience, the active suspension had many pluses:
1) absorbs large potholes slightly better than stock2) felt nimbler around tight turns
I'd driven half a dozen active suspension, granted all but two were operating properly and personally found Q45a cars felt less composed when driven over a series of bumps (something to do with the execution-time for the hydraulics?) than a conventionally-equipped Q45.
My gripe with the Active Suspension system, as with the 4-wheel steering on some Q's and Z32's, was that at times there's a sense of vagueness, a disconnection from almost, the handling.
I honestly felt my Q (with Tokico's at all fours, springs, energy suspension bushings throughout) felt sharper, much more predictable and responsive than before the conversion.
After evaluating the cost of maintenancing an A, the decision was pretty easy.
But it really is all subjective I guess. Give each one a shot before you jump headfirst into a conversion.
If you do decide to convert, I have a step-by-step write-up that will help simplify the conversion process.
QShip- How've you been?! How's the Q running?