91 NA RHD manual 2+2, or 90 NA auto 2+2, your opinions?

The Nissan 300ZX (Z32) general community discussion forum
Archie
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:45 am
Car: 1989 Honda CRX 1.6i-16

Post

I'm selling my CRX and I've been looking through some Z's for sale here.
Can you give your thoughts, which one sounds better to you? These listings are partly in finnish, but I hope they make some sense.

Here's the 1st one, (probably a 91)-92 NA 2+2 RHD manual. Imported from Japan. Asking price is 5500€ (about the same in $) without those rims;
http://www.nettiauto.com/en/nissan/300zx/8077985
Image

And the 2nd one, I've checked this in person and it looked good, 90 NA 2+2 auto, he's asking 7000 euros..;
http://www.nettiauto.com/en/nissan/300zx/7449102
Image


Sgt
Posts: 1227
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 5:13 pm
Car: 1991 Fairlady Z (JDM) Twin Turbo

Post

I personally like the silver one

-it has coiloverscoil overs
-silver paint won't show imperfections like black will
-its rhd (my z32 is rhd and I love it)
-very clean engine bay
-biggest point is its manual. Hate auto, especially for a sports car

Both are low km's so that's pretty much irrenavent.

Oh and not that this plays into your decision, but the rims on the black car are on the wrong side. They are directional rims that are designed to help cool the rotors. So if you get the black one, you'd wana correct that.


Return to “300ZX (Z32) General”