The Infiniti dealer performed service history is archived at Infiniti. The dealer can get it.gr8ful wrote:My local Infiniti dealers could not find a service history on the vehicle in their systems or on Nissan.net.
1) Is there a way to tell if they have been replaced without a major engine tear down? 2) Is this something my Infiniti dealer could verify in a bumper to bumper inspection?3) Is it safe to “assume” the guides have been replaced given the mileage?4) If problems are uncovered by the inspection, what type of problems should I absolutely have only the Infiniti dealer fix, rather than my mechanic or doing it myself?5) What effect will using a lower octane than 91 have on the performance &/or engine?
Regarding #3- When do guides fail? Has anybody made it that long on the original guides??Regarding #5. What in the world are the knock sensors for then?? They "listen" for detonation and retard the timing. They don't "know" if you have 93 Octane in Arizona heat or 87 Octane in New England coolness. In addition, driving habits influence pinging/detonation as much as anything. Only cars without knock sensors runs hot because of incorrect timing.maxnix wrote:The Infiniti dealer performed service history is archived at Infiniti. The dealer can get it.
1.) No, the front covers have to come off.
2.) No.
3.) No.
4.) Infiniti specific ones. No way to tell your independent technician's level of competence with the information you supplied.
5.) It will severely reduced it's longevity and can compuond other problems like poor cooling. If you can't afford Premium, look at Hondas or Cadillacs.
Regarding #3, we've seen motors completely lost <70k, and I recall jesda eeking out >185k, and they found the guides were brekaing, but no missing parts.bullittandy wrote:Regarding #3- When do guides fail? Has anybody made it that long on the original guides??Regarding #5. What in the world are the knock sensors for then?? They "listen" for detonation and retard the timing. They don't "know" if you have 93 Octane in Arizona heat or 87 Octane in New England coolness. In addition, driving habits influence pinging/detonation as much as anything. Only cars without knock sensors runs hot because of incorrect timing.
P.S. Nice job on insulting the new member.
Thanks for the thorough answer about the octane, just wanted to know if this was just a recommendation for optimum performance or could it cause real damage.redmanfx wrote:Never assume that the guides have been done even if you have a high mileage Q. Premium gas is a must or you will ruin the engine and the exhaust system with continued use of octane below 91. Even the FSM states that if you "have" to use gas with octane level below 91 to mix it if possible. Full throttle driving should never be done if you don't have 91 octane or higher in the tank. The VH45DE engine can last forever if properly maintained and lubbricated, which is one of the greatest features of the Early Q's. My Q has 275K and runs so quite you can't hear it running since I've replaced the pulley bearing.
Pulling the front cover off the motor is supposed to be easier then dropping the oil pan to check for chain guide pieces and almost everything can be done by you if you have the time and inclination.
Falk's Q is indeed a cherry and I look forward to one day parking mine next to it just to hear it whimper!!
If you ever want to sell the Q I'll give you $500 cash for it as is. I love the G50!
Be aware some of the ebay CD versions are no better than a random stack of xerox pageshttp://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread/196270gr8ful wrote:I found several FSMs on CD on ebay motors. I would imagine that the CD version is as complete as a hardcopy, true?
In order to not sound rude I've edited this post. I think you're wrong about low octane "severly reducing" longevity. Maxnix, please explain how using octane lower than 91 will severly reduce the longevity of the engine.maxnix wrote:Read a few more of the posts, especially all by Q45tech. All your questions will be answered.
Be wary of following advice from newbie members who are too lazy to do the reading and research!
I've heard this also but I don't have any evidence to prove it. I think it would be bad to aggressively clean either the transmission or engine (strong flushes) which would certainly dislodge some deposits. However, I would (and have) drain and refill the transmission fluid a couple of times over the couse of several thousand miles which would get new fluid in but not too quickly.gr8ful wrote:Thanks Rex, I'll keep searching for a hardcopy version of the FSM.
Also, my local Infiniti dealer and several mechanics are warning me not to replace the transmission fluid since I have no history of regular transmission services. They say, if it has not been changed regularly, it is best not to flush and replace the fluid as this often stirs up things and causes problems. The transmission does not appear to have any issues, shifts smoothly with no slippage.
Have any of you found this to be true? I do have 220K miles on the car, but I don't know if this is the original transmission or not.
Maybe I am, but please read Q45tech's posts before you decide.bullittandy wrote:I think you're wrong about low octane "severly reducing" longevity. Maxnix, please explain how using octane lower than 91 will severly reduce the longevity of the engine.
1. Are you serious? I have to read several thousand posts before I can tell you that you're wrong?!? Get real. I have my own brain and experience from which to base my answer-you might try that sometime.maxnix wrote:1.Maybe I am, but please read Q45tech's posts before you decide.
2.The knock sensors are there to limit engine destruction until the offending failure can be corrected as soon as possible. They are not there to allow running on kerosens or even 87 or 89 octane gasoline, or what no passes for such these days. That is why the Owner's Manual and other OEM publications for the G50 require 91 or higher octane. Remember also, the gasoline was better 15 years ago.
3.Engineering design in an analog system requires conditons remain as near as possible to the designed mean of the parameters. The more variance, the sooner failure will occur.