Post by
rsiwicki »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/rsiwicki-u13199.html
Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:40 pm
thats a good question...I am thinking that maybe my setup with all the mods would do better not redlining to 7,300 rpms since they only have one HP peak at 5,750 rpms vs. the 90-93's with 2 HP peaks at 5,500 & 6,000.
I am thinking that since I have to shift 2 times in the 1/4 that I might get better ET times redlining at 6,900 vs. 7,300 as I would think that more of the power I have is mid rpm range (4,000-6,000) versus the high end range (6,000-7,300). This is all speculative and I am sure Q45tech will set me pointed in the right direction, but I would rather run and additional 400 rpms in a stronger power band (4,000-6,000) versus 400 rpms outside of my strongest power band (6,900-7,300). It is like a trade off...if I have to shift...then I think that I would want to keep my rpms in the area where I produce the most HP & torque versus in an area where my HP & torque are not optimal.
So I would need to do a few ET runs with & without the JWT TCU to see if did me any good. This is all theory yet to be proven.
The trimode would have been perfect as I could not go wrong....I would still have the OEM settings and then the new settings.
As Q45tech pointed out...with the JWT ECU/TCU you would finish the 1/4 right at 7,300 rpms without that second shift saving a lot of time and producing the awesome ET...but if I have to shift then I would think that I would want to keep my rpms more in the strongest power band and I could do so by shifting at 6,900 rpms twice for a total of 800 rpms saved (400 from each shift) from 6,900 to 7,300. These 800 rpms might be better spent at the 4,000-6,000 rpm power band.
I just don't know...but these are my thoughts.