I'm not saying forget the RB20. When I got to Japan in 94 there were seriously pissed off RB20s that were gnawing on stock GT-Rs with extreme malice. I'm just saying be aware. The amount of work and money you will put into the 20 is the same as what you would put into the 25 and 26 and you will get less back for your investment and it will be less reliable because its wick is turned up higher to do it. Also, you are not putting 26 slugs into a 20 block unless you want water-cooled pistons. the crank should go with the 26 girdle.
If you want to try something goofy, you could build one of my ideas. I've never been pleased with the short deck on the RBs and stroking them, IMO is the wrong way to go. I feel the same way about my lil CA18. There is a lot of piston skirt dragging up the cylinder walls at those inefficient rod angles and all people want to do is spin it even faster!
The RB20 is a 78mm bore and a 69.7 stroke
The RB26 is an 86mm bore (starting to see why the 20 block can't handle it) and a 73.7 stroke.
I'd have to check my shop manuals, but I'm almost positive the deck heights are the same. If that's the case, the 20 has the better rod angle, meaning, the piston is pushing more linear to the crank thus losing less power to friction on the cylinder. There's no denying that displacement matters, though, so the etra 600ccs are making a difference.
What if you took a 26 block and dropped a collared 20 crank (the 20 has the same oil pump drive problem as early 26s) in it? You would have to have custom rods done up, but you could retain the 26 pistons and have an RB24 with better top end.