89 240SX KA24E

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
ereyes
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:13 pm
Car: 1989 Nissan 240SX

Post

New to the forum here guys, I have a 89 240SX. Not looking to have a superfast car just a daily driver here (My other car is a Ford F150) So you could see why I'm fixing up my old 240. This car has 220,000 miles on it and is wearing out. Starting with the engine, Is this engine something worth rebuilding or should I (If possible) upgrade the engine to a newer model. Is that legal in California. I will probably post pic's as the car progresses over the next few months. I traded a 94 300ZX TT for my truck and I miss that baby. Any Advice from the pro's here on this forum.


User avatar
JDMEnthused
Posts: 1054
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:04 pm
Car: Nissan 240SX
Contact:

Post

hm.. if i were you, i would run a compression test on the cylinders and if the cylinders have low comp. i would just swap the motor out for a newer S13 KA24DE ( they are pretty cheap and you get more horsepower out of the S13 KADE's)

User avatar
Ni2s4s0aSnX
Posts: 667
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:39 am
Car: Nissan 240sx 2.4L 12Valve

Post

I'd probably say go with swapping in a KA24DE, from the newer S13s and the S14s. The 89s have the KA24E 15 less stock horsepower and a different head setup. Oh, wait one more thing, why would you trade away the TT ZX, I wish I had enough money to afford that.

ereyes
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:13 pm
Car: 1989 Nissan 240SX

Post

Traded the Z cause I needed a truck to pull two dirt bikes and a boat


User avatar
Ni2s4s0aSnX
Posts: 667
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:39 am
Car: Nissan 240sx 2.4L 12Valve

Post

Yeah, alright I can see that. lol

N053B133D
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:49 pm
Car: 2004 Sentra Spec V
1990 240sx Hatchback...sold :(

Post

If you just want something that runs, then i'd just try to find any KA you can get with low miles. The 15 horses isn't that big of a deal. If you go DOHC you have to buy a gague cluster and power steering lines as well. If you're looking for considerably more power with good reliability, you might want to look into the CA18det or the SR20det.

User avatar
Ni2s4s0aSnX
Posts: 667
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:39 am
Car: Nissan 240sx 2.4L 12Valve

Post

The point of putiong in the KA24DE is not because of the 15 extra horsepower, it's because it has more displacement. The only reason that the CA and SR have more power is because they are turbo motors. Ask anyone who knows anything about what they're talking about and they'll tell you that you can't beat displacement. The SR and CA are a fad, that's all I think of it, either that or people just don't have that much common sense. 2.4 liter and add a turbo, or spend the same money on a 2.0 liter motor with a stock turbo. KA-T for $3,500, or a SR20DET for $3,500+. If that's a tough decision, you're just stupid.

User avatar
SOHCSE
Posts: 371
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 3:33 am
Car: 1990 240sx SE
Contact:

Post

Ni2s4s0aSnX wrote: If that's a tough decision, you're just stupid.
Can't you just feel the love?

N053B133D
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:49 pm
Car: 2004 Sentra Spec V
1990 240sx Hatchback...sold :(

Post

Ni2s4s0aSnX wrote:The point of putiong in the KA24DE is not because of the 15 extra horsepower, it's because it has more displacement. The only reason that the CA and SR have more power is because they are turbo motors. Ask anyone who knows anything about what they're talking about and they'll tell you that you can't beat displacement. The SR and CA are a fad, that's all I think of it, either that or people just don't have that much common sense. 2.4 liter and add a turbo, or spend the same money on a 2.0 liter motor with a stock turbo. KA-T for $3,500, or a SR20DET for $3,500+. If that's a tough decision, you're just stupid.
note that i didn't just say power, i said RELIABILITY and power. I hear of a LOT more ka-t motors exploding than the CAs or SRs. Not to mention, the sr is 100lbs lighter than the ka, and the ca is 140lbs lighter than the ka. I wasn't trying to start the "which motor is better" debate, i was just telling him that he should do some research and see which motor HE likes best.

TrueSlide
Posts: 2126
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 7:07 pm
Car: Stuff

Post

I wouldnt call the CA a fad. There are advantages of all 3 motors. There is not stupid decision. Its all about preference.

User avatar
glacier985
Posts: 390
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:30 pm
Car: 72 Datsun 240Z
90 Nissan 240SX
11 Subaru WRX Wagon
16 Nissan Rogue
Location: Central Ohio

Post

N053B133D wrote:note that i didn't just say power, i said RELIABILITY and power. I hear of a LOT more ka-t motors exploding than the CAs or SRs. Not to mention, the sr is 100lbs lighter than the ka, and the ca is 140lbs lighter than the ka. I wasn't trying to start the "which motor is better" debate, i was just telling him that he should do some research and see which motor HE likes best.
ka 493 lbssr 490 lbs ca 389lbs

You are wrong sir there is no 100 lb difference between SR/KA and the CA is lighter then both. And the reason KA-t's blow up is because unlike the SR or CA the were not designed to be turbo-charged. The rods may be forged like the SR but the piston ringlands are thicker on the SR and that is what usually gives on a ka-t.

N053B133D
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:49 pm
Car: 2004 Sentra Spec V
1990 240sx Hatchback...sold :(

Post

glacier985 wrote:ka 493 lbssr 490 lbs ca 389lbs.
I'll be damned, i just heard the sr weighed 100lbs less, guess i was wrong. in any event, trueslide was correct, motor choice is all just a matter of preferance.

User avatar
Ni2s4s0aSnX
Posts: 667
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:39 am
Car: Nissan 240sx 2.4L 12Valve

Post

I'll agree that it is a matter of preference. But the only reason most people are getting the SRs are just because they look at the horsepower number and think, Well, everyone else has one so I want one too.

User avatar
glacier985
Posts: 390
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:30 pm
Car: 72 Datsun 240Z
90 Nissan 240SX
11 Subaru WRX Wagon
16 Nissan Rogue
Location: Central Ohio

Post

N053B133D wrote:I'll be damned, i just heard the sr weighed 100lbs less, guess i was wrong. in any event, trueslide was correct, motor choice is all just a matter of preferance.
I didn't believe it either, I thought the ka was more (iron block vs aluminum blcok), but thats straight out of SCC and if you search you can find it on NICO.


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”