Post by
sexybeasty »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/sexybeasty-u92616.html
Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:31 am
hmm, yeah this one always stirs up a hornets nest of debate, but you really should stick to what is recommended. Not only are you spending a whopping $2.00 more per tank for 89 vs. 87, but the 89 is harder to burn and would reduce power slightly. Beleive it or not, the engineers who designed these cars did know what they were doing (we like to think otherwise ) Going even higher in octane can result in more unburnt fuel which can lead to more engine deposits and cat failure. There really isn't a need to go higher in octane unless you add a turbo or supercharger or increase compression.
On the other hand, the compression is high enough in the 2.5 so it may not be an issue, esp with 89. But then there's the issue of timing and the ECU doesn't adjust timing based on octane levels (it has no way to discern). I think these engines can adjust timing based on the presence of engine knock (via a knock sensor) when the octane level is too low, but they just retard timing in that case, which is not what you want if you are running higher octane gas since it will reduce power even more.
Just my 2 cents; I could be wrong