87 or 89 Gasoline in my 2006 Altima 2.5?

General discussion area for the L31-chassis Altima, including the 05-06 SE-R models.
toolband4308
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 1:19 pm
Car: 2006 Nissan Altima

Post

I just purchased a 2006 Altima silver on black, 2.5L and I have been putting 89 (Premium) in...Is that safe or should I stick back with the 87??? what is the Pros & Cons??


alnissan
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:11 am
Car: 93 Ford Ranger 4x4
92 Nissan 240SX SE coupe

Post

Definately stick with 89. It will only make it run better(better than 87).

User avatar
Scandinavian Flick
Posts: 605
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:07 pm
Car: 2008 Nissan Altima Coupe 3.5SE

Post

and its only 10cents more per gallon then low grade.. so fill the whole tank from empty its only $2

toolband4308
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 1:19 pm
Car: 2006 Nissan Altima

Post

forsure!thanks!

08altima35
Posts: 1540
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:31 pm
Car: 08 Nissan Altima Coupe SE 3.5 6Spd Manny Artisan Turbo Dark Slate

Post

since when was 89 octane premium?

toolband4308
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 1:19 pm
Car: 2006 Nissan Altima

Post

87 is Regular Unleaded, 89 is Premium Unleaded, 91 Is Supreme Unleaded, then Diesel

08altima35
Posts: 1540
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:31 pm
Car: 08 Nissan Altima Coupe SE 3.5 6Spd Manny Artisan Turbo Dark Slate

Post

well... okay. the i say add diesel

User avatar
Scandinavian Flick
Posts: 605
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:07 pm
Car: 2008 Nissan Altima Coupe 3.5SE

Post

toolband4308 wrote:87 is Regular Unleaded, 89 is Premium Unleaded, 91 Is Supreme Unleaded, then Diesel


maybe its just the mid-west region of the country but our high grade gas is 93 octane

sexybeasty
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 3:19 pm
Car: 2008 Nissan Altima SL 2.5

Post

hmm, yeah this one always stirs up a hornets nest of debate, but you really should stick to what is recommended. Not only are you spending a whopping $2.00 more per tank for 89 vs. 87, but the 89 is harder to burn and would reduce power slightly. Beleive it or not, the engineers who designed these cars did know what they were doing (we like to think otherwise ) Going even higher in octane can result in more unburnt fuel which can lead to more engine deposits and cat failure. There really isn't a need to go higher in octane unless you add a turbo or supercharger or increase compression.

On the other hand, the compression is high enough in the 2.5 so it may not be an issue, esp with 89. But then there's the issue of timing and the ECU doesn't adjust timing based on octane levels (it has no way to discern). I think these engines can adjust timing based on the presence of engine knock (via a knock sensor) when the octane level is too low, but they just retard timing in that case, which is not what you want if you are running higher octane gas since it will reduce power even more.

Just my 2 cents; I could be wrong

eight3six
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 5:03 am
Car: 2007 Nissan Altima 3.5 SL

Post

my 07 3.5 says premium fuel is recommended so when i go to the pump 93 if they have it, 91 if no 93, and ALWAYS sunoco gas!

User avatar
domdada
Posts: 263
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:41 am
Car: 08 A/C 3.5 CVT

Post

Higher Octane Level=Reduced Power? Huh? So why do race cars use 110 or higher Octane? Someone Please Explain This?


sexybeasty
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 3:19 pm
Car: 2008 Nissan Altima SL 2.5

Post

the higher the octane, the harder it is to burn. That's why race cars use it. With the compression they run (and with SC/ Turbos, etc) low octane fuel will pre- ignite before the spark, which as you can probably figure, it a very bad thing. Higher octane fuel is needed for high output engines in most cases to avoid this. 3.5's need premium, 2.5's don't.

User avatar
D-Roll
Posts: 1501
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:24 am
Car: 08 Nissan 350Z Touring Coupe
Location: Ruskin FL
Contact:

Post

I use 89 octane, better than 87


Return to “3rd Generation Altima Sedan (2002-2006)”