Really??? I've seen several 5 channel amps, where the "sub" channel output is usually equal to at least the total output of the 4 primary channels.xekushnr wrote:most 5 channel amps have very low rms ratings, compared to a 2 channel or a monoblock. if you are lookinf for a powerful speaker AND sub setup, then seperate amps will probably be your best bet.
oops.. What did you think of the quality of that Phoenix amp ?I'd looked at those ,but heard so little about them in recent years.PoorManQ45 wrote:I typed up a detailed post last night, but forgot to post it
Basically, a 5 channel amp is fine. The people that frown upon them are usually "bassheads" that *think* they need 1k+ watts for their sub(s) alone.
For a NORMAL person a decent five channel amp will work great. I personally would look for one with 50~100w rms x 4 and 200~300w rms x 1.
I recently installed a five channel phoenix gold amp in my neighbors Sentra. The main problem with it was that it was so damn big. We ended up making standoffs to mount it upside down under the rear deck.
In this particular case it would have been easier to have 3 seperate amps. One could be mounted on each wheel well, and the other one on the back of the back seat.
The JL Audio e6450 and 500/5 have good power output to build nice complete systems. Most 5 channel amps have WEAK power for the sub. In most cases, I would rather have two amps rather than one 5ch.Rex wrote:Really??? I've seen several 5 channel amps, where the "sub" channel output is usually equal to at least the total output of the 4 primary channels.
I know some people try to run a 4 channel mode in front stereo and rear mixed bridge & stereo, and in those cases the rear is kind of weak, but those aren't really 5 channel amps.
Tell me, what do you consider "weak"? Is 200~300w RMS "weak" to you? If so then your subs really suck!EW wrote: Most 5 channel amps have WEAK power for the sub. In most cases, I would rather have two amps rather than one 5ch.
^^ AgreedPoorManQ45 wrote:Tell me, what do you consider "weak"? Is 200~300w RMS "weak" to you? If so then your subs really suck!
So if you have a sub (or subs) that is rated for more than 2-300W RMS then they suck? The RMS output of an amp has nothing to do with subs that suck. That is two different issues. Not everyone settles for the buy one- get one free rockford woofers at best buy. My point is that most 5 channel amps are someting like 45x4 and 120x1. That is weak IMO. The JL Audio amps (and probably others) have a good amount of power output for the sub in relation to the amount of output for the mid/highs. While 200W RMS may be fine "in the lane" it does not mean that it is enough to overcome the reality of the noise floor while driving or that it is enough power to drive multiple woofers.PoorManQ45 wrote:Tell me, what do you consider "weak"? Is 200~300w RMS "weak" to you? If so then your subs really suck!
The reason 5 channel amps have such a "weak" sub channel is so that the bass doesn't over power everything else.EW wrote:While 200W RMS may be fine "in the lane" it does not mean that it is enough to overcome the reality of the noise floor while driving or that it is enough power to drive multiple woofers.
Jookmasta wrote:i personally run an mtx 5 channel amp. its the best thing in the world. i have had it for 5 years. 270 watts rms at 2 ohms for the sub is what the sheet said. i can tell u that u need nothing more than this once u have the right sub to match.
Agreed completely.Jookmasta wrote:5 channel amps are the best solution for anyone looking for a nice sounding system without competition goals in mind.