Obviously.....Encryptshun wrote: but then again, i was an English major.
Weren't you an engineer?RobPaulson wrote:its 2.
there is nothing confusing about order of operations dude. nothing.


AppleBonker wrote:Damnit, for it to be 2 it would have to read 48/(2(9+3))
The question read 48/2*12
obviously not...u got it wrong!!ADDirishboy wrote:Oh good lord.
48/2(9+3)
48/2(12)
48/24
2
Wow. That was easy.
I had 20 apples and I multiplied them by a reciprocal into groups of 2.RobPaulson wrote:theres no such thing as dividing, there is only multiplying by a reciprocal, you're using imaginary algebraic operators, y0.
I hope this is an Adams reference...ThatGuyRoger wrote:42
I see what you did there. And I LOLed.ThatGuyRoger wrote:42
DAMN STRAIGHT YOU DID!OriginalWheelman wrote:
I had 20 apples and I multiplied them by a reciprocal into groups of 2.
It's been forever since I've actually had to do any math like this, but following PEMDAS wouldn't you need to MULTIPLY before you DIVIDE (hence the peMDas)?coupecrazy1232 wrote:its 288...
P.E.M.D.A.S
for those who say 2 u need to learn basic math and order of operations
Ahh, I stand corrected. I forgot that the multiply and divide functions were "equals" when it came to the order of how to do them.AppleBonker wrote:Nope, multiply and divide orders are determined by reading left to right:
http://www.mathgoodies.com/lessons/vol7 ... tions.html
AppleBonker wrote:Nope, multiply and divide orders are determined by reading left to right:
http://www.mathgoodies.com/lessons/vol7 ... tions.html
gearhead05 wrote:
It's been forever since I've actually had to do any math like this, but following PEMDAS wouldn't you need to MULTIPLY before you DIVIDE (hence the peMDas)?
Arguing about facts ftw!Speedy7_7 wrote:How is this even an argument/poll?
Pick up a basic algebra textbook and read about the order of operations.
Its like arguing with conservative christains.Razi wrote: Arguing about facts ftw!
Nope, it was invented for (p0rn).Encryptshun wrote:Isn't that why the internet was invented?