$4 Gasbags

A place for intelligent and well-thought-out discussion involving politics and associated topics. No nonsense will be tolerated at all.
User avatar
audtatious
Moderator
Posts: 37008
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 5:31 pm
Car: 2017 Q60 Red Sport. Gone: 2014 Q50s, 2008 G37s coupe, 2007 G35s Sedan, 2002 Maxima SE, 2000 Villager Estate (Quest), 1998 Quest, 1996 Sentra GXE
Location: Stalking You
Contact:

Post

Anyone wondering why U.S. energy policy is so dysfunctional need only review Congress's recent antics. Members have debated ideas ranging from suing OPEC to the Senate's carbon tax-and-regulation monstrosity, to a windfall profits tax on oil companies, to new punishments for "price gouging" – everything except expanding domestic energy supplies.

Amid $135 oil, it ought to be an easy, bipartisan victory to lift the political restrictions on energy exploration and production. Record-high fuel costs are hitting consumers and business like a huge tax increase. Yet the U.S. remains one of the only countries in the world that chooses as a matter of policy to lock up its natural resources. The Chinese think we're insane and self-destructive, while the Saudis laugh all the way to the bank. There are two separate moratoria on offshore drilling: One is a ban that Congress has attached to every budget since 1982, and the other is a 1990 executive order that President Bush has waived in only a few cases. Republicans made failing attempts to overcome both when they ran Congress, but current Democratic leaders and their green masters remain adamantly opposed. The new political opportunity amid record prices is to convince enough rank-and-file Democrats that they'll suffer at the polls if they don't break with this antiexploration ideology.

While energy "independence" is an impossible dream, there's no doubt the U.S. has vast undeveloped fossil-fuel deposits. A tiny corner of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge contains an estimated 10.4 billion barrels of oil and would be the largest producing oil field in the Northern Hemisphere. Yet the Senate blocked that development as recently as last month. The Outer Continental Shelf is estimated to contain some 86 billion barrels of oil, plus 420 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Yet of the shelf's 1.76 billion acres, 85% is off-limits and 97% is undeveloped.

Engineers recently perfected refining solid shale rock into diesel or gas, which may amount to the largest oil supply in the world – perhaps as much as 1.8 trillion barrels in the American West. That's enough to meet current U.S. oil demand for more than two centuries. Yet as late as 2007, Democrats attached a rider to the energy bill that prohibits leasing the federal interior lands that contain at least 80% of America's oil shale. The key vote was cast by liberal Senator Ken Salazar from Colorado, of all places.

These supply guesses are probably conservative, because the only way to know for sure is to drill exploratory wells. Yet most of Alaska and offshore are cut off even from modern seismic testing. Many areas haven't been examined since the 1960s, when exploration technology was far more primitive. This has led to the believe-it-or-not situation in which the Chinese are prepping to drill in Cuban waters less than 60 miles off the Florida coast. American companies are banned from drilling in American waters nearby.

Yes, we know, increased drilling is no energy cure-all; new projects take about a decade to come on line. Then again, more than a few experts say that new production could affect price as the market perceives a new U.S. seriousness to increase supplies. Part of today's futures speculation is based on the assumption that supplies will remain tight for years to come, even as Chinese and Indian demand surges.

Nor would merely repealing the exploration bans be enough. Between 2000 and 2007, the drilling of exploratory oil wells climbed 138%, but over the same period domestic crude oil production decreased 12.4% and fell to the lowest levels since 1947. Refineries for gasoline are stretched to the limit, but multiple regulatory barriers impede new construction or even expansions at existing facilities. Then there is the inevitable lawsuit downpour from the environmental lobby.

Democrats are going to have to grow up. The oil-rich areas they want to leave untouched are accessible with minimal environmental disturbance, thanks to modern technology. Hurricanes Katrina and Rita flattened terminals across the Gulf of Mexico but didn't cause a single oil spill. As for anticarbon theology, oil will be indispensable over the next half-century and probably longer, like it or not. Airplanes will never fly on woodchips, and you won't be able to charge your car with a windmill for some time, if ever.

Public anger over fuel prices could hardly come at a worse time for the GOP, since voters tend to blame a flagging economy on the party that occupies the White House. But the opportunity is to offer a reform alternative to Barack Obama and the high-price energy status quo he embraces. It looks like the public is increasingly ready for . . . change. In a May Gallup poll, 57% favored "allowing drilling in U.S. coastal and wilderness areas now off limits." Just 20% blamed the increase in gas prices on Big Oil, like Mr. Obama does.

Recent weeks have seen some GOP stirrings on Capitol Hill, but John McCain has so far refused to jettison his green posturings, such as his belief in carbon caps and his animus against offshore development. A good reason for a rethink would be $4 gas. At present, it is charitable to call Mr. McCain's energy ideas incoherent, and it may cost him the election.

http://online.wsj.com/article/...looks


User avatar
rn79870
Posts: 5415
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:54 am
Car: 2008 G35 & 2005 Vette C6 vert.

Post

I saw a cute little film on TV last night. It was about the trip a gas molecule takes from the oil field to your gas tank.

The little molecule starts in the middle east where it is pumped out of the ground. At this time, the gallon of gas would be worth about 5 cents. It is then piped to the docks, where it is loaded on a tanker and begins its trip to the US. During the voyage, that little gallon of gas is sold, traded and resold to commodity brokers several times. By the time it gets to our shores, it has increased in value to $3.31.

It is now piped to the refinery where another 12 cents is added for the cost of the refining process. We are now at a $3.43 gallon.

The Washington adds $0.45 to that gallon in taxes bringing that gallon to $3.88.

To pay for transportation to the station, and add a little profit to the station owner for selling that gallon we add another $0.12 cents. We’re now up to $4.00 a gallon. If there are local taxes they are added at this time.

Interesting enough, the station owner is making 3 to 4 cents a gallon. That’s about 1 % or less of the price. No other business can run on a 1% profit margin.

I think the message is clear. The people who are making the money are the ones trading nothing but paper while the oil works it's way to America. how it goes from a nickle to over 3 bucks while floating in a ship represents someone making obscene profits. To this end, the government is powerless to intervene.

The answer is to open oil exploration and drilling, AND keep the let the government profit from the speculation, not private individuals or companies.

User avatar
audtatious
Moderator
Posts: 37008
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 5:31 pm
Car: 2017 Q60 Red Sport. Gone: 2014 Q50s, 2008 G37s coupe, 2007 G35s Sedan, 2002 Maxima SE, 2000 Villager Estate (Quest), 1998 Quest, 1996 Sentra GXE
Location: Stalking You
Contact:

Post

You forgot one thing. Oil "in transit" is also intentionally delayed in order to get prices of the oil that arrives higher.

Also, only 10% of our oil comes from the middle east.

User avatar
rn79870
Posts: 5415
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:54 am
Car: 2008 G35 & 2005 Vette C6 vert.

Post

I looked into it a while ago, and I found that the gas came from;

40% from the US35% from Mexico and Canada25% from other places.

If those # are true, then that’s 60% from “foreign” sources. I even found out that we're exporting some of the crude we pump up. I wonder if we'll ever know the truth.

User avatar
smockers83
Posts: 3889
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:07 pm
Car: 2006 G35 Coupe

Post

Gas stations making a profit? I hope you're kidding. They may add those 12 cents in order to cut their losses. I was talking to a guy at a station, and this seems to be the general story, that each month they lose $2000 due to gas sales.

wawazat8402
Posts: 578
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 10:08 am
Car: 89 Sil80- RB25DET

Post

Im all for drilling in ANWR and coastal areas, as long as the impact to the environment is regulated. With our technology today, there is no reason this cant be possible to achieve with minimal disturbance to the surrounding environment. Make the oil companies spend some of that money they claim is being used for research and expansion on actual research and expansion.

But...what do I know. Im only 24 and my opinion doesnt matter, haha.
Modified by wawazat8402 at 8:52 PM 6/12/2008

User avatar
audtatious
Moderator
Posts: 37008
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 5:31 pm
Car: 2017 Q60 Red Sport. Gone: 2014 Q50s, 2008 G37s coupe, 2007 G35s Sedan, 2002 Maxima SE, 2000 Villager Estate (Quest), 1998 Quest, 1996 Sentra GXE
Location: Stalking You
Contact:

Post

Katrina showed how much drilling technology has increased. 150-ish rigs hit and no oil spills.


Return to “Politics Etc.”