that model in the video was actually labeled a type R. but basically a TT 2+2 with revised suspensionnsrZ32 wrote:Oldie but goodie
they didn't mention but i'm sure they were...otherwise the test is pointlessphanatikz32 wrote:i currently dont have sound on my computer so i couldnt hear what they were saying.... where the cars both stock?
no really in japan they labeled 98 and 99, your 2+2 z32 tt's type r no joke.i looked it up on google and accidentally came across a historical retrospect on z cars. i had the same reactionnsrZ32 wrote:Both cars were bone stock. WTF is a type r? Not racing hondas here. No such animal as a Type R Z32
Stock manual trans Z33 vs Stock manual trans 2+2 TT Z32
ok it doesn't matter... really i put this thread up mainly in the belief that the z32 as performance and construction goes is superior to the z33.Z33 was built not to be to expensive so it's a limited platformredtop91 wrote:Ionno. Jerry is the Z master. I'm gonna have to disagree on this one.
ha found it. scroll down to the bottom of the z32 segment.last line,,redtop91 wrote:Ionno. Jerry is the Z master. I'm gonna have to disagree on this one.