I've driven both stock vs. stock and my buddies swapped s13 with coilovers and lots of other suspension bits vs. several z32's (including mine) with coilovers and a whole slew of suspension mods.NoStickers wrote:It doesn't sound like she will be racing her car unless its at the drag strip. For a daily driver I doubt anyone would really notice the difference in handling between the two unless they both have stock suspension.
I don't believe you. Maybe you should take a vacation, come to florida and let me drive your car.nsrZ32 wrote:
I've driven both stock vs. stock and my buddies swapped s13 with coilovers and lots of other suspension bits vs. several z32's (including mine) with coilovers and a whole slew of suspension mods.
No contest. Z32 handles better and its certainly noticable, period.
Ding ding ding....we have a winner. She gets her 11-12s vehicle and he gets his S2k.nismofly wrote:she can buy looney's r1 so he can get an s2000
may even be able to ride it in a year or two
Although what you said may be true, weight transfer isn't everything when it comes to handling. So you can't really say 300zx>240sx in the handling department for all cases.InsanityInc wrote:The 300ZX will always handle better than a 240sx. Why? Lower center of gravity (on the chassis, not because the chassis is lower, though that's also true), and about a 15-20% wider wheelbase. Anyone who says "but the 240sx is lighter" gets smacked, because that means **** for peak roadholding so long as you're not overloading your tires.
How is weight transfer not everything when it comes to handling? That makes no sense.crzycav86 wrote:Although what you said may be true, weight transfer isn't everything when it comes to handling. So you can't really say 300zx>240sx in the handling department for all cases.
You're partly wrong. The only thing that affects weight transfer is the height of the center of gravity, track width, weight, and amount of lateral force you apply.InsanityInc wrote:How is weight transfer not everything when it comes to handling? That makes no sense.
Weight transfer IS everything when it comes to handling.
Why do you not want body roll? Because it increases weight transfer.
Why do you not want a high CG? Because it increases weight transfer.
Why do you not want a narrow track width? Because it increases weight transfer.
Why do you not want a floppy noodle chassis? Because it increases weight transfer.
The only thing that isn't weight transfer which relates to handling is straight tire grip, which is going to be equal between two cars with the same tires anyway.
No, body roll and a floppy chassis most certainly do affect weight transfer. A floppy chassis just also affects suspension geometry.crzycav86 wrote:Body roll changes the height of the center of gravity along the roll center, but this is not the main reason why body roll is bad. Body roll is bad because it dynamically changes the alignment settings.(ie: the outside wheel gains camber). A floppy chassis does not affect weight transfer to any significant degree, it just makes suspension less effective, and less predictable.
BRILLIANT!!nismofly wrote:she can buy looney's r1 so he can get an s2000
It's actually hovering right around 10 flat if you can keep the front wheel down.rousie13 wrote:Ding ding ding....we have a winner. She gets her 11-12s vehicle and he gets his S2k.
Hmm.....I wonder what my bike runs.Looneybomber wrote:BRILLIANT!!
It's actually hovering right around 10 flat if you can keep the front wheel down.
I hope you're rich, or just love working on bikes. And that's coming from a Triumph owner...nismogirl3 wrote:Oh, and if I DID get a bike (which isn't on my agenda at the moment) I'd have to go for a aprilia rsv 1000r or a ducati 749r
nismogirl3