mojo22 wrote:i looked at howstuffworks...but i didnt' really see anything that i didn't have a basic understanding of, or anything that really seemed like it was minute technical info. i won't say there aren't little nuances that i don't understand, but here is my thinking about the whole thing....and i am probably not right. Pressure and volume are related....volume is not what is going to move the pistons and pads, pressure is. as volume goes up, pressure goes down. now, the internal volume of the 300z caliper is going to be greater, so i guess that means pressure would drop throughout the the line.........anyway, what i was thinking is that the pads don't really move but like a tenth of a mm anyway, so the displaced volume is very very inconsequential.....IMHO that is. i think the real key is the amount of clamping force on the rotors themselves....i.e. pressue. the four piston calipers allow for more clamping force and surface area of friction on the bigger rotor. the pad has a bigger footprint on the rotor. much like having wider tires....they have a larger contact patch on the groud...more friction...better traction. so, once the volume of the caliper has been filled, i guess the need of having more volume will cause the pressure to go down? so, does going to a larger Master cylinder mean it will have a larger bore....i.e. more fluid volume moved per stroke of the piston in the MC......fluid is displaced....volume goes down...pressure goes up. or am i just overthinking this? that was a rhetorical question.
Ok, a few things to point out. Pressure and volume are directly related yes. But, the reason you fill your brake cylindar with Brake Fluid instead of simple, cheap water is because water will compress when pressurized (not very much, but it does) and brake fluid does not. Of course, water also boils at a lot lower temperature also, which is another reason. So, the overall volume of the FLUID will not change, the volume of the system will only change. SO, if you have more volume to fill, you need a larger bore cylinder. This is because if you have a small bore filling behind a small piston it's great, but if you have a small bore filling behind 4 pistons then it takes a longer pedal stroke to displace the fluid. That's why you bump up to a larger bore brake cylinder.
Now the point about the pads, friction and rotors. Believe it or not (and most of you will argue this to death), surface area has nothing to do with friction. I will say it again....SURFACE AREA HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FRICTION. Think about this before argueing though. Friction is defined as follows:
frictional force = (coefficient of friction of surface/object)*(Normal force of surface on object)
In other words, no where in this equation do you see area, volume or any other measure of distance. I know what you are gonna say: "Why do wider tires give better traction?" I asked my physics professor this. What's he say? Something along the lines of more rubber compensating for imperfections in the road. I dunno exactly what he is getting at, but this is how it is, according to University Physics by Reese/Brooks/Cole. I still don't fully believe it myself but if someone can tell me where surface area is untroduced, I would love to hear it. It would put my mind at ease =)