So basically, you're saying a cat-back won't help much? I beg to differ. Why in the world would great, reputable companies like Stillen and Nismo even make them? If you look under your car, there are restrictions in the piping. Just opening those areas up will have it's benefits. You're looking at a good 8-12 ponies there.Ormand wrote:By the time that legal headers are available for these cars, the Honda Civic will be making 300hp. There are still no headers available for the 2006 Altima that won't set codes, as far as I know. The stock cat-back is pretty good, so replacing it isn't going to gain much, unless maybe you go with straight pipe. That leaves us with a short ram, an ECU reflash, and laughing gas!
Hey Mikey, I got the answer for you and it only costs $9.99 plus shipping. It's a "stage III turbo chip" which gives you 35-45 HP and it installs in less than 30 minutes.shift_mikey wrote:thats just it, i'm looking for the 30hp without pulling cams or even removing a valve cover. I'm talking simple bolt ons and programming. I don't want to think about cams and injectors etc etc
Time will tell
ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!generic808 wrote:This one is even better. It's a "custom electric centrifugal supercharger" which somehow gives a N/A motor a 2-3 psi boost! Boost in what?! But hey, they sell it on ebay so it must work, right? Dude, we get a 20% HP increase, so adding this will bump us up to 324 HP. Gee, I didn't know it was that easy! ____<---- insert sarcasm there I think I'm going to purchase 2 so I can be pumpin' 4-6 psi and my car will be pushin' 378 HP. Who needs a Skyline when you have 2 of these under your hood
Check it out: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors...wItem
OMG this one actually has 5 bidders!! http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors...wItem
Don't hold me to it. There is not a lot of data about towing/racing/increase hp with the CVT. Dont' forget, it is just a steel belt riding on 2 pulleys that change their size...... The biggest factors being, if the belt snaps, and the other, if the belt slips. I'm sure nissan engineered some sensor to prevent the belt from slipping, but overcoming it with power and breaking is my concern. Who knows, maybe its built to handle 400hp, but i'm not gonna be the first to find out!!!II Knucklez II wrote:so with a CVT, it cant handle the power or what casue i was planning on doing alot to get the hp up around 350 or so?
Let's see, when was the last time GM put a 4 cyl in a Vette? Oh, yeah, NEVER! But they do have 300+hp, and they will turn at least as well as an Altima with wrong wheel drive. But they don't respond well to fart cans, and neon lights on the suspension. Nissan is developing the CVT, and their engineers like real performance, not "snappy", and they measure with calibrated instruments, not the seat of their pants. BUT- you are right that it hasn't been shown to work with high HP yet. But HP won't hurt the trans as quickly as torque- so those running a 4cyl can mod away, at least for while.jwill3212000 wrote:I knew if i rubbed the bottle long enough the genie would answer my wish. I have an 05 -2.5sl and with the CAI,cat-back, NGK irid for hot packs, a nice re-tune from my laptop, and some good synthetic; I can feel real HP and TQ gains in the seat of my pants. The 2.5 has the (ahhhh-sigh) breathing room for a turbo. It suites this car perfectly as apposed to the weight/balance and fuel consumption of the 3.5 altima. This is not your 69 Camaro we are talking about but a light weight tuner. The CVT is a nice transmission, but not for a sport tuner. A 6 speed or a snappy auto is the way to go. You dont see GM putting CVT's in their vettes. So letts get real, HP/TQ verses weight/balance and the RPM curve. The real problem is getting the ponies on the groung. Thats Nissans main weakness. A real good, snappy AT and strong limited slip is the answer. Kind of useless having 300+hp in a sharp right turn
I haven't seen any headers or performance parts other than an aftemarket intake (which can't be worth much power if anything you may loose tq) and a stillen axle back (that's what it looked like from the pictures).Ormand wrote:By the time that legal headers are available for these cars, the Honda Civic will be making 300hp. There are still no headers available for the 2006 Altima that won't set codes, as far as I know. The stock cat-back is pretty good, so replacing it isn't going to gain much, unless maybe you go with straight pipe. That leaves us with a short ram, an ECU reflash, and laughing gas!
I can't explain the scientifical reason but I can explain the theory.I'm going to use an intake manifold to explain the theory.The intake manifold on our cars have runners (tubes) where the air runs through to get to the heads of the engine where the valves sit. That runner was designed to flow a specific cfm to produce a certain effect. Too big of a runner will cause not enough velocity, and the air wont flow as well at low rpm's (where the tq is made) but will be good at high rpm's (where the hp is made). Too small or a runner (example: thin, cramped, lots of bends) might be flow less cfm's but will make more tq at lower rpm's at a trade off of loosing some higher end power, where flow isn't very good.dldjros69 wrote:how in gods name r u gonna lose tq with an air intake????
And what would that give you? Where could you possibly unleash 350 horses (or even close) if not at a track?II Knucklez II wrote:so with a CVT, it cant handle the power or what casue i was planning on doing alot to get the hp up around 350 or so?