C-Kwik wrote:I'm pretty sure I was looking at the whole picture.
I'm looking at the wider spectrum of consumer activity and what people perceive as their needs and wants. The
whole picture includes people who sacrifice comfort, space, style, prestige, and driving enjoyment for a few measly dollars saved on fuel. And as seen during the oil spike of 2008, they'll even trade in their trucks with upside-down loans, pissing more money away than if they had kept their old vehicles.
That's nearsightedness. That's the broader point I'm trying to get at.
We're all subjected to scarcity -- all resources, including time and energy, are limited. The wealthy deal with scarcity. The poor deal with scarcity. No one is immune.
What are the costs, savings, and opportunity costs of making various compromises? While some considerations, like steering, ride, and handling, are down to one's personal preferences, the fuel economy issue is exaggerated by marketing- and media-driven hysteria, causing some to make costly compromises they don't really have to. And "costly" doesn't necessarily involve a number on a spreadsheet. "Costly" in this case refers to the sacrifices you make in space, comfort, and pleasure.
Penny wise, pound foolish?
There's a fine line between practical and miserly.