Post by
BamaCoupe »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/bamacoupe-u122644.html
Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:19 am
Yes your car should be faster with the traction control off. Don't know how ours is setup, but most traction control system's work by applying the brakes or reducing throttle opening when the car senses slippage or loss of traction. As for mcheddadi; unless I planned to boost in the future I wouldn't take your manual trans any day over a good auto trans, which I wouldn't classify the CVT a good auto trans. Not saying you're not a good driver mcheddadi; I would have no idea, but a manual trans is only faster then an automatic if the driver of the manual was dang near as good as a professional driver (someone how test drives or races for a living). Not to sound like a butt, but I would say probably less then 15% of the users here with a manual can actually drive a manual good enough to make a difference. Good example; I used to have a 90 300ZX with an automatic trans, my brother had a 90 300ZX with a manual and one of my friends step dad had a 91 300ZX with the manual trans and my car would smoke both of their cars. Was mine really faster; probably not, they both probably just are not good enough with a manual to make the difference. The only thing the manual has over an automatic is less power restraint. Yes there are for instances like the Z32TT (90-96 300ZX TT); were Nissan used a crappy automatic transmission, so the Manual models produced 300hp, but the automatics only come in at 280 hp. Nissan reduced the power on Automatic models by 20hp so the transmission would hold up, so yes the manual would smoke an automatic in this case. As for our cars; same hp, same torque and weight I don't know, but I don't think it's enough difference to compensate for a driver that really doesn't know how to drive a manual and can't hit every gear perfectly. Now after saying this; no I'm not claiming to be great or even good with a manual just making a point, so let the flaming begin!