I'm just going by reviewed times - the Mustang GT does a 0-60 in 5.1 seconds (manual) whereas the 3.5 does a 5.8 (CVT). You can't really screw the CVT up, but the driver of the mustang can suck at shifting.Hussain wrote:there is no way in hell a stock 3.5se can take a stock 05+ GT mustang lol 300 HP with more torque then us. they do mid to upper 13's. only way your doing those kind of times in the 3.5se A/C is with a stripped interior, no muffler, headers, intake and a tune..... then you'll beat them. i did a 13.9 with no back seat, no spare tire, no tire jack, no muffler on a cold day at pretty much sea level.
What planet are you living on? The 2.5 can barely pull a 7.4 in the 0-60 sprint...no way on earth could that even come close to a Mustang GT.fullvietFX wrote:I'd take the 2.5 A/C over any Mustang other than the Cobra.
lol give him a break. we're on a A/C forum, nothing bad about showing A/C some lovemarlin29311 wrote:no way on earth could that even come close to a Mustang GT.
I know the Mustang is faster, but it doesn't mean I'd rather drive it.marlin29311 wrote:
I'm just going by reviewed times - the Mustang GT does a 0-60 in 5.1 seconds (manual) whereas the 3.5 does a 5.8 (CVT). You can't really screw the CVT up, but the driver of the mustang can suck at shifting.
What planet are you living on? The 2.5 can barely pull a 7.4 in the 0-60 sprint...no way on earth could that even come close to a Mustang GT.
Marlin is completely correct in his statement and I agree 100% -- in fact I would go as far to also suggest that a 3.5 AC CVT would be a very good match for a 05+ Mustang GT. A regular v6 mustang would be SPANKED by a 3.5.marlin29311 wrote:I'm just going by reviewed times - the Mustang GT does a 0-60 in 5.1 seconds (manual) whereas the 3.5 does a 5.8 (CVT). You can't really screw the CVT up, but the driver of the mustang can suck at shifting.
Ain't that the truth.jerseyblood wrote:Truth is someone is always faster and you should just be happy with your car.
After I pulled on one GT, he got up next to me in traffic and asked me, "3.5 eh?" I said, "Yeah, you thought it was a 2.5 huh?" He said, "I was hoping it was a 3.5. I wanted to see what it could do." My response was, "Obviously not the outcome you were hoping for." He started laughing and told me, "Okay smarty pants, See ya around!" Then he turned off.Hussain wrote:not that i can recall but i have beaten some 99-04 GT mustangs in the past. they got 260 HP with more torque..... the auto does 14.4 with a good driver and the stick does 13.9 with a good driver. don't the 05+ V6 mustangs do like 15's?