Granted, good PR and foreign relations are necessities, but one can't help but wonder how that money could benefit the people in our country. I say take care of your own before worrying about taking care of everyone else.HashiriyaS14 wrote:US foreign aid is a powerful political tool and, generally (i.e. Israel notwithstanding), a worthwhile investment.
In particular, to developing nations, US foreign aid establishes a tie between us and them. It lets them know that we care about their development. This MATTERS, because they are thus less likely, as a nation, to tolerate anti-US sentiments or anti-US terrorists on their soil.
Nations that get a lot of US foreign aid are much less likely to become "problem" nations in the future. It's very cheap insurance. $22 million a year is nothing compared to the potential cost of a military deployment to neutralize problems.
Sounds like during the time of Jefferson, you would be on the pirates side and we would continue to pay them off for safe passage.HashiriyaS14 wrote:US foreign aid is a powerful political tool and, generally (i.e. Israel notwithstanding), a worthwhile investment.
In particular, to developing nations, US foreign aid establishes a tie between us and them. It lets them know that we care about their development. This MATTERS, because they are thus less likely, as a nation, to tolerate anti-US sentiments or anti-US terrorists on their soil.
Nations that get a lot of US foreign aid are much less likely to become "problem" nations in the future. It's very cheap insurance. $22 million a year is nothing compared to the potential cost of a military deployment to neutralize problems.
I will clarify. The U.S. has ONLY two choices in regards to the developing world:Armelius wrote:Sounds like during the time of Jefferson, you would be on the pirates side and we would continue to pay them off for safe passage.
How do you feel paying for the world to just lay around and wait for another welfare check?
Honestly, yes. Our relationship with Pakistan is a PERFECT example.Armelius wrote:So if we continue to supply Pakistan with money and war materiel we won't have to fight a nuclear war with them?
Exactly...Cold_Zero wrote:Hey, if 22 million dollars to Madagascar keeps Eastern Africa from having another Rwanda, Somalia or Zimbabwe, I think it is money well spent. Why is it that we think that billions of dollars spent in Iraq or Pakistan is an investment in our security and yet 22 million dollars in a small French speaking East African country is a waste. I would prefer that we engage Africa (Saharan and Sub-Saharan) actively to combat some of their problems.
Actually, I believe that our main sources of oil come from Venezuela, Nigeria and the Gulf of Mexico. There are a few oil producing nations in Africa. They just dont have the reserves and capability that the Middle East and Russia have.WDRacing wrote:They just don't have any oil...so they rank basically no where.
Good point.HashiriyaS14 wrote:Yeah, the cost/benefit ratio of our foreign aid is SO much higher in Africa than in any other part of the world, generally speaking.
The Chinese are starting to make major capital investments on the continent, to the point that while the major source of foreign currency in Africa in recent memory has been aid, in 2008 actual investment finally surpassed aid, thanks to the Chinese.
We need to start investing there too, not just aid, but real investment. Can't go letting all of Africa become a de facto Chinese colony just because they're finding opportunities there that we choose to ignore.
I could go buy a rope and have some realistic human ornaments for my trees. That is money well spent. It's what they are going to do anyways.Cold_Zero wrote:Hey, if 22 million dollars to Madagascar keeps Eastern Africa from having another Rwanda, Somalia or Zimbabwe, I think it is money well spent. Why is it that we think that billions of dollars spent in Iraq or Pakistan is an investment in our security and yet 22 million dollars in a small French speaking East African country is a waste. I would prefer that we engage Africa (Saharan and Sub-Saharan) actively to combat some of their problems.