The 6-cyl CVT's never had the kind of issues the 4-cyl units did, but maintenance is still the key. There's an old Murano in our shop that's about to top 500K on the original CVT, but the customer does spills-and-fills every 30K like a religion. The low-miles cars you're looking at should be trouble-free if you maintain them well. I'd do an immediate D&F on anything you buy just on general principles. Insist on service records for anything above 50K or so, and if the seller can't provide them, look elsewhere.Spartan0536 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 23, 2022 6:46 pmFrom what I have been able to gather so far is that a 2018 - 2020 model should be using Nissans "3.0" version of their CVT which fixed most of the issues surrounding the earlier ones, and they do not share the same issues that the Altima faces, is this correct? Also are the transmissions for these years really as bad as some people say or are they just stuck in days past and are living in ignorance?
So the crap that I see on other forums and reddit about Nissan Maxima CVT's being unreliable even past 2017 are either because the people did not maintain them, raced them to death (you can do that to any transmission, not just CVT), or are just regurgitating stuff from 2008? I am not being accusatory on your behalf as you are an automotive mechanic from the sounds of it so your word carries a good bit of weight. I just wish there was a much more active forum for Nissan cars, unless I am missing something there as well.VStar650CL wrote: ↑Sun Jul 24, 2022 6:14 amThe 6-cyl CVT's never had the kind of issues the 4-cyl units did, but maintenance is still the key. There's an old Murano in our shop that's about to top 500K on the original CVT, but the customer does spills-and-fills every 30K like a religion. The low-miles cars you're looking at should be trouble-free if you maintain them well. I'd do an immediate D&F on anything you buy just on general principles. Insist on service records for anything above 50K or so, and if the seller can't provide them, look elsewhere.Spartan0536 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 23, 2022 6:46 pmFrom what I have been able to gather so far is that a 2018 - 2020 model should be using Nissans "3.0" version of their CVT which fixed most of the issues surrounding the earlier ones, and they do not share the same issues that the Altima faces, is this correct? Also are the transmissions for these years really as bad as some people say or are they just stuck in days past and are living in ignorance?
Allow me to add to your confusion...
Allow me to add a little more. Unless you plan to keep a car for three years and then trade it and want to make sure you won't be at the dealership for warranty once a week, JD Power is pretty useless. It's what it says it is, initial quality. Measuring for the longer term is obviously more difficult, especially with modern CAD/CAM allowing OEM's to engage in 2 and 3 year design cycles if they desire. The fact that the Max has been tweaked-but-unchanged since '16 tells you something. It had few teething problems (notably the Radar and ABS, almost nothing in the drivetrain) and from '18 up is about as "ironed out" as a car design can be. On the other hand, the Regal got a major makeover in '18 and barely a year later GM announced discontinuance in '20, so one wonders how much effort went into whatever wrinkles showed up. My guess is not much. That will probably change now with Uncle Joe's fuel tax resurrecting the sedan and big SUV owners ducking for cover, but the previous MY Buicks won't benefit from that.Rogue One wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:18 amAllow me to add to your confusion...
Consumer Reports rates the Maxima’s reliability 39 points higher than the Regal Sportback.
J.D. Power and Associates rated the Maxima first among large cars in their 2020 Initial Quality Study. The Regal Sportback isn’t in the top three in its category.
This brings up the quintessential question here, FUEL ECONOMY. Yeah I get it, this is not a Hyundai Sonata with a 1.6L Turbo that moves like a 1995 Ford Taurus (not joking, I just test drove that and it feels exactly like that), that gets 42 MPG highway and 36 City from the EPA. Both cars I am looking at have 300+ HP V6 engines, if someone could make a 400 HP 4 cylinder that gets 42 miles per gallon and lasts over 250K they would own the car market for decades, this is not the case in reality.... currently, maybe Elon Musk has some secret tech :PVStar650CL wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:09 amAllow me to add a little more. Unless you plan to keep a car for three years and then trade it and want to make sure you won't be at the dealership for warranty once a week, JD Power is pretty useless. It's what it says it is, initial quality. Measuring for the longer term is obviously more difficult, especially with modern CAD/CAM allowing OEM's to engage in 2 and 3 year design cycles if they desire. The fact that the Max has been tweaked-but-unchanged since '16 tells you something. It had few teething problems (notably the Radar and ABS, almost nothing in the drivetrain) and from '18 up is about as "ironed out" as a car design can be. On the other hand, the Regal got a major makeover in '18 and barely a year later GM announced discontinuance in '20, so one wonders how much effort went into whatever wrinkles showed up. My guess is not much. That will probably change now with Uncle Joe's fuel tax resurrecting the sedan and big SUV owners ducking for cover, but the previous MY Buicks won't benefit from that.Rogue One wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:18 am
Allow me to add to your confusion...
Consumer Reports rates the Maxima’s reliability 39 points higher than the Regal Sportback.
J.D. Power and Associates rated the Maxima first among large cars in their 2020 Initial Quality Study. The Regal Sportback isn’t in the top three in its category.
By the way this is the better comparison from CarGuru's: https://www.cargurus.com/Cars/autos/ver ... wertrains=Rogue One wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 5:18 amAllow me to add to your confusion...
Official Nissan press releases for the different model years you're looking at. Here you'll find details on what features were added (or removed) for each of those years.
2018 Nissan Maxima Press Kit
2019 Nissan Maxima Press Kit
2020 Nissan Maxima Press Kit
2021 Nissan Maxima vs. 2020 Buick Regal Sportback
https://www.asburyauto.com/compare/2021 ... ack/200765
https://www.cargurus.com/Cars/compare/N ... d242_d2608
Reliability (2020 model year as example)
Consumer Reports rates the Maxima’s reliability 39 points higher than the Regal Sportback.
J.D. Power and Associates rated the Maxima first among large cars in their 2020 Initial Quality Study. The Regal Sportback isn’t in the top three in its category.
A final thought, make sure that you get a Carfax or AutoCheck on whatever vehicle you decide to buy.
2016-2021 Nissan Maxima: Problems, Engine, Pros and Cons
- Maxima has lower compression by nearly a full point, so it ought to be more able to handle regular or midrange then the Buick.Spartan0536 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 7:52 amThis brings up the quintessential question here, FUEL ECONOMY. Yeah I get it, this is not a Hyundai Sonata with a 1.6L Turbo that moves like a 1995 Ford Taurus (not joking, I just test drove that and it feels exactly like that), that gets 42 MPG highway and 36 City from the EPA. Both cars I am looking at have 300+ HP V6 engines, if someone could make a 400 HP 4 cylinder that gets 42 miles per gallon and lasts over 250K they would own the car market for decades, this is not the case in reality.... currently, maybe Elon Musk has some secret tech :PVStar650CL wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:09 am
Allow me to add a little more. Unless you plan to keep a car for three years and then trade it and want to make sure you won't be at the dealership for warranty once a week, JD Power is pretty useless. It's what it says it is, initial quality. Measuring for the longer term is obviously more difficult, especially with modern CAD/CAM allowing OEM's to engage in 2 and 3 year design cycles if they desire. The fact that the Max has been tweaked-but-unchanged since '16 tells you something. It had few teething problems (notably the Radar and ABS, almost nothing in the drivetrain) and from '18 up is about as "ironed out" as a car design can be. On the other hand, the Regal got a major makeover in '18 and barely a year later GM announced discontinuance in '20, so one wonders how much effort went into whatever wrinkles showed up. My guess is not much. That will probably change now with Uncle Joe's fuel tax resurrecting the sedan and big SUV owners ducking for cover, but the previous MY Buicks won't benefit from that.
The best fuel economy I have seen from that Buick Regal GS in the car was 35 MPG which was the previous owners last trip, that is impressive, but I imagine that was all very conservative highway. My question here is what do these 2018 - 2020 Maxima's do AT BEST for fuel economy and not just reading the EPA estimates... are we talking 33 MPG?
Also what is your take on using 87 Octane fuel in the Maxima, any performance issues or long term ill effects, because premium gas HURTS, and my current LS400 eats it like its a fat kid eating cake.
Also these are technical specs on the 2018 Buick Regal GS that I am considering as the alternative to the Maxima's.. https://gmauthority.com/blog/gm/buick/r ... fications/
The Buick's Manual states to use Regular Unleaded (87 Oct) fuel in the engine despite having a higher compression ratio. Just wondering on how the Maxima performs on 87 octane and if it would damage the engine over time if I just used regular unleaded.PalmerWMD wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 3:43 pm- Maxima has lower compression by nearly a full point, so it ought to be more able to handle regular or midrange then the Buick.Spartan0536 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 7:52 am
This brings up the quintessential question here, FUEL ECONOMY. Yeah I get it, this is not a Hyundai Sonata with a 1.6L Turbo that moves like a 1995 Ford Taurus (not joking, I just test drove that and it feels exactly like that), that gets 42 MPG highway and 36 City from the EPA. Both cars I am looking at have 300+ HP V6 engines, if someone could make a 400 HP 4 cylinder that gets 42 miles per gallon and lasts over 250K they would own the car market for decades, this is not the case in reality.... currently, maybe Elon Musk has some secret tech :P
The best fuel economy I have seen from that Buick Regal GS in the car was 35 MPG which was the previous owners last trip, that is impressive, but I imagine that was all very conservative highway. My question here is what do these 2018 - 2020 Maxima's do AT BEST for fuel economy and not just reading the EPA estimates... are we talking 33 MPG?
Also what is your take on using 87 Octane fuel in the Maxima, any performance issues or long term ill effects, because premium gas HURTS, and my current LS400 eats it like its a fat kid eating cake.
Also these are technical specs on the 2018 Buick Regal GS that I am considering as the alternative to the Maxima's.. https://gmauthority.com/blog/gm/buick/r ... fications/
- Maxima has better fuel EPA economy paired with a larger fuel tank. This make you more resilient on long drives or in supply disruption ( hurricane?) times.
Where is that? I want to buy it!Spartan0536 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 2:26 pmincluding one peculiar offer that comes with an UNLIMITED MILE AND TIME WARRANTY, but the maintenance records were lost on it.