That's what to Toyota thought... then they had the dbw/sticky pedal problem.N8NiTTY wrote:I think this is cutting edge and I'm sure they would not release this without fully testing it.
Point TakenatlM35 wrote:That's what to Toyota thought... then they had the dbw/sticky pedal problem.N8NiTTY wrote:I think this is cutting edge and I'm sure they would not release this without fully testing it.
That's what I was thinking.... But aren't most/all throttles electronic at this point? The "steering by wire" tech is then somewhat analogous (i.e. eliminate a physical connection for a computer one). Back to Toyota, the Lexus incidents were insane, but I guess I am ignorant as to how their system was any different from an average car.atlM35 wrote:That's what to Toyota thought... then they had the dbw/sticky pedal problem.N8NiTTY wrote:I think this is cutting edge and I'm sure they would not release this without fully testing it.
+ degraded electronic components over the life of the car (especially in extreme weather areas), computer stability issues from problems in your cars electrical system, hackable, input delayatlM35 wrote:but it's not as sensitive to other factors such as water, overheating, incomplete programming... just too many variables when it comes to electronically controlled systems.
I wouldn't be surprised. Mercedes is always the first to develop the new tech then the rest adopt the idea a few years later.jonlex99 wrote:Guys correct me if I'm wrong. But isn't Mercedes Benz using or has been using this technology. In a few of their models. I don't think this is new technology maybe to Nissan/Infiniti. Anyways I think this will be interesting to see and try.
That POS CTS I have posted about before had an auto-centering steering wheel (I know this because the steering wheel [and not the car or floorboards or seats] would vibrate on smooth roads when there was no alignment/balance problem due to a bad [auto-centering steering wheel] sensor that got replaced under warranty). How could the steering wheel auto-center (or otherwise move itself without the wheels changing direction) if it was directly attached to the steering system? I'm pretty sure this isn't new at all if Cadillac wta using it at least 6 years ago...atlM35 wrote:I wouldn't be surprised. Mercedes is always the first to develop the new tech then the rest adopt the idea a few years later.jonlex99 wrote:Guys correct me if I'm wrong. But isn't Mercedes Benz using or has been using this technology. In a few of their models. I don't think this is new technology maybe to Nissan/Infiniti. Anyways I think this will be interesting to see and try.
I do not really know that that is completely true. Infiniti has been known for not selling their technology well. They have been using forward facing laser based cruise control since late 2001. Systems like distance control assist, lane departure prevention, and voice command have been used for many years with very little fan fare. Any of the three systems that use the active gas pedal were rolled out with almost no publicity. When Jeep started using laser cruise I think they purchased Super Bowl ad space and ended up buying more ad time than the local candidates in the most recent election. Audi and Toyota are ahead of Benz in many of they cutting edge tech in many aspects. They are both have autonomous programs that were announced at CES recently. (http://www.nydailynews.com/autos/driver ... -1.1236345 ) Autonomy is happening, fairly soon too probably. I am one of the few geeky supporters of this system. I look forward to it, I bet it feels better than some companies electric steering systems. Personally I would like to see a sport mode that allows you to decrease steering ratio, or expand it for parking lot movements using a wider ratio.atlM35 wrote:I wouldn't be surprised. Mercedes is always the first to develop the new tech then the rest adopt the idea a few years later.jonlex99 wrote:Guys correct me if I'm wrong. But isn't Mercedes Benz using or has been using this technology. In a few of their models. I don't think this is new technology maybe to Nissan/Infiniti. Anyways I think this will be interesting to see and try.
I cannot find anything legitimately posted that makes mention of everything being made over there. We need to remember that China has the most rapidly expanding class that can afford these cars. Infiniti would be stupid to ignore this. Several European manufacturers are already building over there. BMW is the only company I can see that builds there and exports globally, but it does not appear they are in the North American markets or the UK since public perception is not very good. The majority of the components are already made in China, but I bet you they continue to complete final assembly in a country with a more favorable public image. I am biased thought, I would not have purchased a new G if it did not have a J to start its VIN.bejjutsu wrote:Did you all know that the new Infinitis will be made in China? That's probably the scariest part of any of this.
I cannot find anything legitimately posted that makes mention of everything being made over there. We need to remember that China has the most rapidly expanding class that can afford these cars. Infiniti would be stupid to ignore this. Several European manufacturers are already building over there. BMW is the only company I can see that builds there and exports globally, but it does not appear they are in the North American markets or the UK since public perception is not very good. The majority of the components are already made in China, but I bet you they continue to complete final assembly in a country with a more favorable public image. I am biased thought, I would not have purchased a new G if it did not have a J to start its VIN.[/quote]bejjutsu wrote:Did you all know that the new Infinitis will be made in China? That's probably the scariest part of any of this.
That video is a bit misleading though and makes me think even more about it just being marketing hype. The video says that the electronic control responds quicker to your inputs than a mechanical connection, which is completely impossible unless the mechanical design is for some reason made with a "deadzone". I realize most people are pretty stupid about anything technical and would just believe what they are told or see in a video, but anyone who understands how mechanical things work would know it doesnt get any more quick to respond than the input being directly coupled to the output a mere couple feet away. The amount it responds would obviously be tied to gearing and such, but direct mechanical connection does not have lag time like the video suggests. Whereas even if you got the fastest computer possible, there would still be a lag time for data processing and signal transfer. Granted that yes in the fastest system possible the lag would barely be 50 microseconds which you cant even comprehend, but we wont have the fastest system possible and the point is that any computer connection will be slower no matter what than a direct mechanical connection. I hope as you said that Nissan really did put a ton of thought and work into this and that it turns out well, but the advertisements are nothing more than marketing hypeSteveTheTech wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZhoPe1X8KU[/youtube]
I agree a fair portion of this is marketing team spin run through several sets of lawyers in many countries. The time delay in the mechanical connection has got to be arguably small and people are terrified about this concept already. A decade ago people were scared about using throttle by wire, even then the network speed was quick enough that it never caused any problems. Nissan and Infiniti have been using remote brake control as well since about 2002, throttle control started with secondary throttle control on the Q and full control on everything in 2003.EniGmA1987 wrote: That video is a bit misleading though and makes me think even more about it just being marketing hype. The video says that the electronic control responds quicker to your inputs than a mechanical connection, which is completely impossible.