Post by
50HIRogue »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/50hirogue-u249642.html
Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:42 pm
It's beyond me to speculate on why Nissan (or any other manufacturer, for that matter) would install a mileage indicator in their vehicle as a feature for the consumer and have it purposely be inaccurate or dismissed as a toy. It shouldn't have been added at all if it was, especially since it was developed and implemented at some appreciable cost to the vehicle (I can code myself). It's programming, R&D that goes into that software do-dad. Regardless, most informed consumers will hold the information suspect anyways or at least as a guide just before simply dismissing it outright. It is natural to not trust technology, I do get that angle, but that said, I'd actually like to know the concise math formula to use when figuring out mileage on our own. Assuming one can divide up a gallon down to ounces, millilitres and so forth over accurate distances without (human) error - a computer usually does this better or with less deviation than a human. To be honest, I don't have a huge chalkboard, much less a log book, to be completely accurate in figuring this out. The kids need to be on time. At any rate, I'll likely still use that indicator between the gauges as a guide. The publications I've read regarding the review of the Rogue do report deviation -and this wasn't a surprise- to begin with. The outcome is always the same. Modify your driving behaviors (outside variable factors like temperature and idling) to get the highest number possible (mpg). To this end, that little toy works. If you don't fit your pants, lose weight, even if the scale might be off. Sounds mediocre, but effective. If I'm hitting 36 HWY and it's off by two miles, as state folks say, "Good enough for government work."