2014(?) Kia Soul review

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Time for another stupid review of a car none of us ever even think about, courtesy of company travel time!

This time, I ended up in a black-on-black 2nd gen Kia Soul. The guy at the Enterpise counter (who knows me pretty well by now) asked if I'd rather have the Jeep Patriot or the Soul. I explained that he'd be paying me $60 to even sit in the Patriot, nevermind drive it away, so he tossed me the key to the hamstermobile.

The Soul was actually pretty okay. If I HAD to have a compact car and HAD to have something "tall" with a high seating position and a hatchback, I'd be an entirely different person. But if I WERE that person, the Soul wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. At least I think it wouldn't. I've never met that other person and if I did I think I probably wouldn't like him very much.

ANYWAY. The car.

It looked like this:
Image

Basically, it's far from the least pleasant small car I've ever driven, which is probably a compliment of some sort.



Styling
6/10

It's goofy-looking, but not "love-or-hate" polarizing goofy like the Juke. It's pretty conservative while still being different. I don't exactly like it, but I don't really dislike it, either. It is at least tasteful and not riddled with unnecessary creases, curves, and stupidity like so many others. The body lines are clean, panel gaps are fairly consistent, it's a square with rounded corners, and the tail lights are the size of a small continent. Not much more to say.

Interior
7/10

As with the styling, the interior doesn't do a whole lot explicitly WRONG, but it also doesn't try much harder than it has to. It's very average. Being a tall, square car, it feels fairly roomy (but also narrow). The gauge cluster is clean and simple, with white illumination that's easy on the eyes.
The center stack is obnoxiously red-light and a mess of poorly-organized and -chosen buttons. The gauge needles are red-lit, but rimmed with black which for some reason bugged the hell out of my eyes in low-light situations.
The steering wheel has WAY TOO MANY buttons, most of which are absolutely NOT even vaguely approaching being important enough to be within thumbs' reach at any time (trip odometer reset?! Transmission shift mode control?! WTF?!). However, the wheel's hub is atypically small and thin by modern standards, leaving a LOT of open space on the wheel, which gets a big thumbs-up from me.
The most notable aspect of the car's interior: the steering wheel's plastic material is UTTERLY HORRENDOUS. Hard, smooth, and slick. It feels like the $25 Mad Catz racing wheel I used to have for my PS2. My hands were sweatier after 15 minutes of driving in the Soul than they've ever been in my life. It would drive me nuts if it were my daily driver.
The control stalks were covered in too damn many controls, too. They also weren't round, but rather squareish with a single concave face, which means with any functions turned on (rotating the stalk knob) you have an awkward surface to flick for signals, high-beams, etc.)
The radio controls are as terrible as I've come to expect from all modern cars: functions I actually use buried in menus while there are acres of individual buttons dedicated to functions I will never ever need to use. To swich between AM and FM you have to dive through a 3 level menu. There's a "Display" button that doesn't change what's displayed; it turns the display OFF. Yeah. At least I was able to very quickly pair my phone for bluetooth audio with only a couple button presses.
Driver ergonomics are okay, but there's the problem of wheel:pedal positioning ratio that makes an ideal seat distance impossible to find. The shift lever is too low and forward to be useful as a hand-rest (something pretty much ALL new cars have in common). The steering wheel had both telescope and tilt adjust with a LOT of range, but as with nearly every car ever, it doesn't adjust low enough for my taste. That's partly due to the car's upright "commanding" seating arrangement which doesn't exactly cocoon you in the cockpit, but also because it just doesn't arc down very much.
The thing I found the most odd and distracting was visibility out of the car. I'm used to sitting down low in a fairly tall car (the LS8 is new enough that its roofline peaks pretty high, leaving TONS of headroom even above my 6'4'' head). This means a great view out of a vast greenhouse. I expected similar results from the Soul, due to its height, vast stretches of glass, and squareness. I was surprised to find that this was not the case. You sit so high in the Soul that your visibility is mostly downward. I felt awkward passing semi trucks, where my view felt obstructed vertically. With a sunshade deployed to a side window, this feeling increases and one ends up with a bizarre feeling of gunslit windows in a car that really has massive panes of glass all around. Basically: yet another side effect of tall seating that I really dislike a lot.


Powertrain
6.25/10

The little thing gets out of its own way just fine. It has passing power when needed. The 6-speed wasn't excessively prone to downshifting even with all the "economy" settings turned on. (Hey, I had to try it or how would I know?) It felt more refined than average, though the idle was still fairly offensive in terms of both smoothness and sound. Cruise control wasn't particularly adept at maintaining speed on non-level terrain, and waited far too long to downshift for more power when climbing.
I think the biggest standout factor for me is that, driven pretty conservatively with all the "eco" buttons pushed, I managed a round-trip fuel economy of 27.8 MPG. That's ridiculous. This is most definitely NOT an "economy" car. It's just a little one. For a car that tiny, with 6 gears, highway cruise below 3k and eco fuel saving logic built into everything, I expected far, far, far better.
I never tried the manual shift mode, which is probably a solid compliment to the automatic's shift logic in general.

Handling
6/10

It was surprisingly confidence inspiring and competent. Body roll was kept fairly minimal. Not a lot of understeer in normal driving, though I never really pushed it much. Steering was insanely light but quicker than expected. Brakes were perfectly sufficient. It's wouldn't be a frustrating car to drive every day from a handling standpoint, but it isn't remotely rewarding, either. But that's a perfectly acceptable line for a car of its type to follow, and certainly preferable to the Corolla/Elantra approach. Road feel was completely absent, with surface feedback feeling even more numb than even the über-soft tall-sided 225-65 snow tires I currently have on the LS (which are themselves about as communicative as a quadriplegic mime). Made for a nice smooth ride, which is somewhat impressive given the well-controlled body roll in such a small car but, once again, it's not going to get your blood pumping any faster.

Features and extras:
4/10
The car had cruise control, bluetooth, power mirrors, and A/C. It did NOT have an auto-dimming mirror (what a stupid cost-cutting measure! electrochromic mirrors are far more effective at reducing glare while maintaining visibility than prismatic mirrors in my experience).

Other notes:
The cabin was REALLY hard to keep at a constant temp. I'm sure it was largely due to the fact that the car is one enormous flat-sided black cube with greenhouse windows, but it got HOT, even by my standards, and finding a setting that cooled it without overcooling was pretty much impossible. I fiddled with the climate controls more than anything else in the car, and never ever found the sweet spot.
Hilariously, using the rear wiper spray function caused massive amounts of AM-band interference. Clearly, there's some Ford-grade electrical work going on in this thing despite it's badging.
Speaking of the rear wiper, it has 3 speeds and none of them are what I needed. I drove the car during a blizzard through a mountain pass, and through rain after that. The slowest speed is so fast that it streaks the window in light rain, which left me manually triggering it from time to time to maintain my rearward visibility.
It felt quite competent in the snow. I got nailed by a blizzard through Malad (a 5600 foot summit/pass in southern Idaho) which left over an inch of snow on the highway. Other traffic was crawling along at 40 but I felt quite safe at 60 in the Soul. It was not remotely squirrely and felt firmly planted even in the slush and snow.
The door window frames are comically assembled from welded box tubing, with miter welds that look like they were done by first-year tech shop students. You could probably lose an eye to one if not careful. The front windows have a similarly amusing sharp kink in them. Just an odd sight for a guy who is used to driving low sedans with slicked-back A-pillars and arcing front windows.
The headlights were EXCELLENT. High beams were really strong, but the low-beams were perfectly sufficient for most of my middle-of-nowhere, entirely-unlit late-night drive. I didn't feel like I was missing the high beams desperately during stretches where oncoming traffic made them unusable.
Lastly: While the interior illumination dims quite a bit, the turn signal indicators on the gauge cluster do NOT dim along with it. Basically, I got blinded every time I used my signals after dark. They're psychotically over-bright.

Overall:
6.5 out of 10.

It won't make you wish you were driving something else for your typical commute, but it won't inspire you to tell your friends about it, either (unless you're a freaking weirdo like me and enjoy writing reviews of blandmobiles).


User avatar
Rogue One
Administrator
Posts: 7947
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:15 pm
Car: 2011 Nissan Rogue SL
2012 Nissan Rogue SL
2022 Honda Pilot SE
2025 Honda CR-V Sport L
Location: Florida, USA

Post

Image

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

I was in California during the spring with a Soul as a rental. I thought the AC was quite strong.

I, too, found some of the steering wheel buttons confusing and excessive, and the narrow cabin sometimes felt confining.

Also, the short wheelbase and firm ride meant that it rocked fore and aft on California's choppy highways, occasionally causing my teeth to chatter. This is, again, the problem with South Korea's perfectly paved roads and the lack of suspension refinement from Hyundai and Kia. They are either very harsh or too mushy.

The sound system was on point, however. Unusually crisp and clear for an cheap box. The cabin will also swallow an entire bicycle.

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

There is an abundance of them in the NW Valley. The over 55 sect LOVE them.

User avatar
frapjap
Posts: 13175
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Car: '99 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
'07 Subaru Legacy
Location: South Coast Massachusetts

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote: I got nailed by a blizzard through Malad (a 5600 foot summit/pass in southern Idaho) which left over an inch of snow on the highway. Other traffic was crawling along at 40 but I felt quite safe at 60 in the Soul. It was not remotely squirrely and felt firmly planted even in the slush and snow.
That and, "because rental car."

User avatar
frapjap
Posts: 13175
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Car: '99 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
'07 Subaru Legacy
Location: South Coast Massachusetts

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote: I got nailed by a blizzard through Malad (a 5600 foot summit/pass in southern Idaho) which left over an inch of snow on the highway. Other traffic was crawling along at 40 but I felt quite safe at 60 in the Soul. It was not remotely squirrely and felt firmly planted even in the slush and snow.
That and, "because rental car."
:gapteeth:

User avatar
Jookmasta
Posts: 5172
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 3:26 pm

Post

Not a fan of the looks but I guess if you needed something cheap and didn't want a truck or suv, this could fit the bill? I expected better mpg out of it as well, but I'm sure it weighs more than it looks. I still am not sure what category of vehicle it is, nor why people are attracted to it. But I see them more on the road than any other Kia vehicle for some strange reason.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Jookmasta wrote:Not a fan of the looks but I guess if you needed something cheap and didn't want a truck or suv, this could fit the bill?
That's basically my conclusion as well. Not really sure WHO it appeals to, but it's not a bad option for said mystery person.
frapjap wrote:That and, "because rental car."
:gapteeth:
Nah, rental or not, terminal understeer still puts you in a ditch, so I definitely wasn't inclined to push things too far.

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19003
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

Snow understeer can be cured by liberal usage of the E-brake.

Dry pavement understeer can be cured in the same way.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

I prefer to cure understeer with throttle. Unfortunately, that only works in correctly-engineered cars with the motor pointing the right way. FWD is so intolerable in the snow.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

In this class of car I strongly prefer the Mazda 5. The 5 has a lower floor, smoother engine, and more cargo and head room. Because it's low to the ground, you feel more confident in corners and your legs can stretch out a bit. Also, the middle seats slide back and forth. You can turn the back passenger area into a limo-like experience if you're just carrying a few people (three rows, two across).

Of course, Americans want to sit up high so the Mazda has been unpopular here, plus the Kia is 3 to 5 grand cheaper, a big difference in price for the sub-$20k class.


Return to “General Chat”