2012 Camaro SS convertible review

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
frapjap
Posts: 13175
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Car: '99 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
'07 Subaru Legacy
Location: South Coast Massachusetts

Post

So the story goes that two of my best friends were getting married in the same week, so one plane ticket later and some borrowed accommodations, I had a few bucks to spare on a rental car of my choice. Normally I’d just go cheap and get whatever econobox they’re willing to give me, but being that the weddings were about 5 hours apart from each other I decided that a large amount of time wasn’t going to be spent on the road in an uncomfortable automotive appliance. As such, I gave Avis a call, plugged in my Wizard number, and reserved a 2012 Camaro SS convertible.

Having previously rented (and enjoyed) a 2010 Camaro equipped with the V6 last year, I figured the SS model with an upgraded suspension, the ability to go topless, and 6.2l V8 could only bring more delight to an otherwise stale and boring drive from Orlando, FL to Savannah, GA and back again.

After picking up the vehicle at the preferred booth, I was having trouble getting the top to operate. Unlike my Miata, this top is not quite as simple and requires a little more thought. First, you must pull and twist the solitary roof latch. Next, you push the button, hear the motor whine and receive a crappy nonsense message on the instrument cluster telling you to “secure the luggage rack.” After some frustration (mainly due to anxiousness) a friendly Avis employee showed me that if one wishes to lower the top, they must pull on what looks like a privacy shade (inside the trunk) and latch it. My guess is that this step assures that there is enough clearance in the trunk for the top to fold down without crushing any luggage.

Once this was figured out, I adjusted my seating position, tilt and telescoping steering wheel and mirrors; all very intuitive controls and easy to operate. Upon turning the key, you’re greeted with a low (make that very low) growl and miniscule rumble. Even with the top down in the parking garage, the engine doesn’t sound like it produces 400 horses. Though the throttle is pulled open by fly-by-wire, the go fast pedal does have reasonably accurate resistance for a fuel injected vehicle. When selecting reverse to pull out of the garage parking space, a subtle “ding” is emitted from the speakers and a back-up camera pops up in the left side of the rear view mirror. Nifty. I don’t trust them and would rather turn around and see first hand what is happening, but others will probably like the feature. However, I must note that visibility with the top up is incredibly poor and the back-up camera will definitely be more of an aid than an annoyance. Fortunately for me, the weather was perfectly sunny and I never had to drive with the top up for 6 days.

Upon leaving the garage, the first point of business was to let those rear tires rip. Stand on the brake- check. Ease into the gas- check. Listen for engine to rev- waaaaait a minute. Its only revving to 1 grand. Damned Toyota and their unintentional acceleration lawsuit! You’re unable to hold the gas and the brake at the same time without being limited. Fortunately for me, this car is equipped with a traction control button. Even more fortunate is that it seems to completely turn off the traction control to the point where roasting the tires is very possible with the limited slip differential.
Image

After the burn out that'll leave your friends and other observers choking on massive amounts of smoke, the car accelerates like a scalded snake. Motor Trend reports a 0-60 of under 5 seconds and 0-100 in 11 seconds. I didn’t time how long the SS took to accelerate to 60 or 100, but my butt dyno and huge smile on my face would provide substantial evidence that it was damned fast. Within 20 minutes of having the Camaro in my possession, I was cruising down an interstate at an unmentionable triple digit speed. (And for all you nay-sayers, I was the only vehicle on either side of this desolate highway at the time the decision was made to see just how fast she was. Besides, I didn’t hit the limiter). Additionally, the brakes have excellent feedback and gobs of grip, mainly due to the four piston Brembos- they’ll bring you from “go straight to jail without passing go” speeds to the law-appointed limit in a hurry.

Handling wise, driving the chassis hard isn’t as rewarding as expected. Since I was in my home town, I drove to an undeveloped acreage with finely paved roads that had been there since I was in high school; ie: great place to let the car rip. Much to my dismay, the first long sweeping turn I attempted to take was…neutered. The Camaro SS is equipped with the StabiliTrak electronic stability control system. This system incorporates anti-lock braking, traction control with an active braking system to control wheel slip. Being that I normally auto-x a Miata with none of these electronic, fun spoiling nannies, I was very put off the first time that the system intervened. To my knowledge, you can not disengage it, either. Or at the very least, not on the model provided to rental car companies. There also was not an off switch or button to change modes. Hopefully there is if you purchase one for yourself. Otherwise, the system sucks the soul out of a well balanced (50/50), confident, and stable chassis. Normal, run of the mill consumers may not be bothered by this, and with that said, the convertible handles as well as any coupe, properly poised and braced, it is extremely responsive and confident in the corners- even with the StabiliTrak. A note about StabiliTrak; while the systems does its job very well and keeps the car under control while driving aggressively, I just prefer to do my own work and not have it done for me as if I were playing Gran Tourismo in practice mode.

While piloting the car around town, everything feels harmonious. The steering wheel is meaty with a tight circumference and two extra protruding “nubs” on the inside of the wheel at the 10 and 2 positions- something I have grown accustomed to in my ’88 Trans Am. The only downside is that I would prefer a 4 spoke steering wheel to the massive bottom of the three spoke currently equipped. Road feel is transmitted through the wheel very well with satisfactory feedback. Steering wheel controls for cruise and radio are a plus as well. A heads up display (HUD) also keeps your eyes on the road. I chose the view of the tach and speedometer. A cluster of four analog gauges in the forward position of the center console give you up to the minute transmission and oil temperatures, oil pressure, and battery volts. While this may not be important information to the casual owner, the enthusiast will enjoy glancing at them from time to time and will certainly appreciate them as the vehicle ages and/or modifications are added.
Image
The turn signal stalk has a thoughtful “one tap for three blinks” function and other well placed controls. When you’re not listening intently for the muted sound of your V8 or the wind rushing past you, the Boston Acoustic sound system will make you forget all about the lack of an engine rumble and slight bother of wind noise. Tones all across the range are superb- bright highs, punchy mids, and tight bass come from the 6 speaker sound system. Even the head unit that resembles ET comes with a customizable EQ.
Image


The air conditioning works quickly and very well, but I never used it for an extended period of time. However, one morning it was a tad chilly so I used the heated seats. They heated evenly, and with two settings never felt too hot, even though I was only wearing a t-shirt. The only downside about driving the car that makes me cringe just a little bit was casually turning around to check for cars in neighboring lanes. The headrest, though well placed and perfectly supportive, is wide and makes a quick glance over your shoulders take a little more effort.

Wind noise and cowl shake are uncharacteristic of a convertible. As in, they’re both extremely tolerable. Conversations can be heard in the cabin and the music doesn’t flow out with the wind. Cruising on the highway and high speed stabs at the pedal are smooth and don’t drown out the cabin. After returning the Camaro and getting into my own convertible 4 hours later, it was apparent how excellent of a job Chevy did with the wind noise. Kudos, Chevy. With the SS being so enjoyable to drive, you won’t even notice or mind the gas mileage it gets. The best mileage returned 19.8 mpg at an average speed of 78 mph. A small price to pay for driving bliss.
Image
Image

On to the styling. Simply put, seductive and sexy. Not enough of these ‘retro’ models being released by the Big 3 pull off a tribute to the original without being considered an insult to its predecessors quite as well as Chevy has accomplished with the Camaro. Anywhere I parked the car had folks taking long glances at it or pulled them in to take a better look at the interior. I also loaned the car to my recently wedded friends to ride away on the back as they waved farewell to their guests. For every four “they look so great together comments” there was a male saying, “where’d they get that car??!”
Image
Image

Whether you’re driving on the highway or city streets, others will notice the Camaro. Guys of all ages will flash you thumbs up or try to race you, and crossovers loaded with women and young girls on their way to the beach will yell and wave at you. Who could blame them? The top folds neatly over the rear quarter humps leaving a clean, unbroken belt line. The short over hang in the front and rear and aggressive looking stance of the nose appearing slightly lower than the rear give the impression that the Camaro SS could kick your a** if it was so inclined. Simple, massive 5 spoke wheels fill the wheel wells just right without looking gaudy. The “angel eye” headlights tucked into the already recessed grill are complimented by ‘just right sized’ fog lights below them. Chrome neatly outlines each of the tail lights. Styling wise, every detail of the exterior works.

However, the forward thinking of external styling wasn’t as thoughtfully applied to the interior. While there is more to like than not like (the steering wheel, gauges, and seats previously mentioned) there are long stretches of hard plastic on the doors above the arm rests and dash board. Soft touch materials and leather were kept in strategic places- arm rests, steering wheel, shifter- but spared in others where they would be more aesthetically pleasing. The seats are appointed in quality leather and are extremely supportive and comfortable on long drives, and despite having no lumbar control, never tired my back or rump. Rear seating is what you’d expect of a sports car- a minimalist approach with room for children to be comfortable. This isn’t the convertible you’d take the family around in, Full House style to cruise San Francisco. One last styling cue- when the sun sets, a light, unobtrusive ring of blue outlines the large plastic slabs of plastic on the door. While somewhat cheesy, its actually enjoyable.
Image

Overall speaking, having the Camaro SS drop-top for just under a week was an incredibly enjoyable experience. The addictive speed and handling never got old, nor did the looks and compliments. While the latter may fade in time, the former will keep smiles on your face for years to come. If I were able to afford the vehicle (not that it is all that expensive for a high powered convertible at $39,000) this rental experience would have sold it to me on the spot. Though I would have a tough time owning such a visually and mechanically stunning car in silver.
Image


User avatar
tigersharkdude
Posts: 2636
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:14 am
Car: 1999 Nissan Maxima
Location: Nashville, TN

Post

Want a white car with orange factory stripes and black leather and convertible

User avatar
snwbrdr435
Posts: 12721
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:07 am
Car: 85 VW Westfalia, CBR F4i, SV650s, 1988 Honda Hawk(race)
Location: People's Republic of MA
Contact:

Post

Did they charge you extra to clean the stains off the interior?

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

I dislike convertibles, but love new Camaros. I do like the way the beltline works without a top, and the way the roof doesn't mess with the car's lines up or down. Most convertibles look confused with the top up and mutilated with the top down. A few recent cars, like the 370z, the Solstice, and the Camaro manage to look great either way, and it's a trend I'm happy to see. The Mustang convertible, on the other hand, still looks like a contestant in the Model-T look-alike contest with the top up, and a pile of bleh with the top down.

Unlike many people, though, I really don't like the nose of the Camaro. I like the general idea, but the execution is exagerated. I don't like that the grille follows a different angle than the surrounding bumper. It's all a little too pointy and attentoinwhorish.
I also dislike the modern trend of hoods that close into the bumper rather onto the grille. The forward panel seam at front of the hood is the ultimate eyecatcher, particularly since the bodywork is generally angled downward at that point. I hated this on the quad-headlight integra way back in the mid-90s, I hate it on the new Maxima, and I hate it on the Camaro. The worst offender on this count, I think, is the just-retired generation of Camry. Just bring the hood all the way forward where the seam can be hidden.
I love the rest of the Camaro's styling, though. Well, aside from the ridiculously high beltline. The squared off tail lights are my favorite part: instantly iconic Chevy but thoroughly modern. I'd genuinely like to see the next Corvette adopt this look over the round ones...even just for a while, to try something new.

Stability control makes me very, very angry. I'm immensely happy that I can turn that nanny s*** ALL THE WAY OFF in the LS8. For skilled drivers, I would argue that stability control makes things WORSE, as it's very difficulty to maintain natural control of a car whose attitude is constantly being altered by computers without warning. When I go to countersteer but the car thinks better, I just end up with TWO messes to sort out instead of one. First thing I do every single time I get in the LS (even in the snow) is hit that Off button.

User avatar
frapjap
Posts: 13175
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Car: '99 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
'07 Subaru Legacy
Location: South Coast Massachusetts

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote: Unlike many people, though, I really don't like the nose of the Camaro. I like the general idea, but the execution is exagerated.
I also dislike the modern trend of hoods that close into the bumper rather onto the grille. The forward panel seam at front of the hood is the ultimate eyecatcher, particularly since the bodywork is generally angled downward at that point. Just bring the hood all the way forward where the seam can be hidden.
I love the rest of the Camaro's styling, though. Well, aside from the ridiculously high beltline. The squared off tail lights are my favorite part: instantly iconic Chevy but thoroughly modern. I'd genuinely like to see the next Corvette adopt this look over the round ones...even just for a while, to try something new.

Stability control makes me very, very angry. I'm immensely happy that I can turn that nanny s*** ALL THE WAY OFF in the LS8. For skilled drivers, I would argue that stability control makes things WORSE, as it's very difficulty to maintain natural control of a car whose attitude is constantly being altered by computers without warning. When I go to countersteer but the car thinks better, I just end up with TWO messes to sort out instead of one. First thing I do every single time I get in the LS (even in the snow) is hit that Off button.
I agree with you on the hood lines.While I like the nose of the Camaro, I hate, hate, hate that the hood is just another door. I'd prefer it to follow the lines of the fender and meet at the front bumper. The belt line takes some getting used to as well. The chassis appears to be sitting low, but you'll find yourself with a seating position just as high up as some of the CUV's the next lane over.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Best looking convertible for the money, period. I do wish manufacturers offered larger back seats in their topless cars. It was nice this past weekend driving around the city in the Saab with four adults and the roof open.

I need to rent one now.

Great review!

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

Next time try a drop top Mustang GT.

Styling, I much prefer the Mustang.

it doesn't look like it's trying to hard to remember the 60's

User avatar
alms24sebring
Posts: 7332
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:18 am
Car: '97 Nissan 240sx. First Nissan. First love. Sold.
'04 Nissan Sentra SER SpecV
Location: Alexandria VA

Post

Theres a few things that I think are good and bad about the new Camaros. I have ridden in one but never drove.

I guess I like the way they look, more the front end tho. I like the eyebrow look of the hood over the grill, looks classicy too as was intended. Burnout marks as demonstrated are nice, lsd. I think the power is there but can be hard to hear. I thought it was very quiet on the inside and the seats were comfy. My friend has the rare Ruby Red (forget actual name) one which is discontinued and really looks really really good in the sun. Its like blood red and I have never seen another one like it, I love that color.

Things I dont like... Its a bit too quiet, even with an exhaust. Its also heavy and feels bulky when inside of it and you can feel the weight. My friend complains of a cheap and choppy feeling of the 6speed. I have mixed feelings about the consule gauges but I really dont like, hate, the lights in the interior door panel. Thats so like.. idk barbie girl and fashionable. Things I dont like about the posted one: A/T :squint: and vert. I dont like verts at all but thats just me.

User avatar
frapjap
Posts: 13175
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Car: '99 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
'07 Subaru Legacy
Location: South Coast Massachusetts

Post

alms24sebring wrote: My friend has the rare Ruby Red (forget actual name) one which is discontinued and really looks really really good in the sun. Its like blood red and I have never seen another one like it, I love that color.

Things I dont like... Its a bit too quiet, even with an exhaust. Its also heavy and feels bulky when inside of it and you can feel the weight.
That color is amazing, I've only seen a couple in that tone. There is a blue with very similar properties, too.
As for quiet- if it were loud, more customers would probably complain. Chevy probably figures an enthuasist will purchase an aftermarket exhaust anyway. The only place I really heard the engine make noise was under an overpass.

Weight wise, when tossing the car around, it doesn't feel all that heavy for its size. The steering, brakes, and throttle all respond to driver input very, very well.
Ask to flog...er...drive your friends sometime!

User avatar
sx moneypit
Posts: 8911
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:54 am
Car: 2010 Nissan 370Z
1986 Toyota MR2
Location: Memphis,Tn.

Post

Great review Ray!

User avatar
alms24sebring
Posts: 7332
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:18 am
Car: '97 Nissan 240sx. First Nissan. First love. Sold.
'04 Nissan Sentra SER SpecV
Location: Alexandria VA

Post

I should, he might let me. I hardly ever talk to him anymore though. His wife is a bbbbbbbiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiittttttttttttttttcccccccccccchhhhhhhhhhhh

User avatar
alms24sebring
Posts: 7332
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:18 am
Car: '97 Nissan 240sx. First Nissan. First love. Sold.
'04 Nissan Sentra SER SpecV
Location: Alexandria VA

Post

I also forgot to mention that it was old after the first time I saw a yellow Camaro with tags along the line of BUMBLBE with transformer stickers everywhere.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Mr1der wrote:Next time try a drop top Mustang GT.

Styling, I much prefer the Mustang.

it doesn't look like it's trying to hard to remember the 60's
I prefer the revised Mustang's styling, too. It's taughter and more sinewy and a little better realized overall. I don't think it's any less of a wayback machine than the Camaro. In fact I think the Camaro's the more modern-looking of the two retro takes. The Mustang's nose is far sexier than the Camaro's, though, and I love those sequential turn signals. Oh, and the haunches.


Return to “General Chat”