Welcome aboardmosswalker wrote:The CVT did not do the hard shifting at all today when i went to Mosport here in canada to watch the races. However i did end up talking with a guy who had my car and is now driving a 2006 G35 Coupe. We both ended up asking the same question.
Why is it that we both have the same motor but he has me beat by about 60 horsepower?
Is it the ECU?
And man Transmission problems or not, this is one SICK car. Effortless passing, a few seconds of inattention and i am doing 180. Love it, love it. Cant wait to fix the BLOSE stereo it comes with.
Is it possible to switch out the CVT for a Manual if it is pooched?
So many questions. I will shut up now.
According to my understanding i only have 241 hp and 245 torque. Approximately 200 at the wheels.mcheddadi wrote:
Welcome aboard
I think he gets more power because the g35 VQ engine has a higher compression ration and bigger intakes or something, but there can't be a 60hp between him and you, the 3.5SE Altima coupe has 270hp while the max the 2006 g35 has is 298hp (that's a 28hp difference)
You are correct sir. Dr. Bose started out building a great speaker for its time, the 901. Now Bose does not make anything worth listening to and no one reviews what they do build because any disparaging remarks bring lawyers and frivolous law suits. Bose builds life style systems not hi fi systems.Meder wrote: I can not speak for the older altimas. The new coupe bose systems are horrible. Imaging, range, and midbass all lack quite a bit. For the average music lover the bose is fine, but it will never compare to a high end audio set up. Bose has never been worth the money imo in any vehicle.
I re-read my initial post and you are correct as well. I meant that when it shifts from the starting gear to the following gear it bangs into gear or whatever it is called and again on the second shift which in my head would be 3rd. I keep getting told it is CVT if it is not...... i am not a mechanic. Also in this forum i found comments about CVT saying that they artificially program shift points because customers do not like the feeling of shiftless transmissions. They want to feel like something is happening.Buzzman wrote:Maybe I'm being a little anal here, but are you sure your transmission is a CVT?I didn't think Nissan had CVT's in the Altima's in 2004.You also mention your transmission banging in first, and then shifting into second. A CVT transmission doesn't really have a first, or second gear as such. That's why they call it a Constant Velocity Transmission.Just curious.
CVT is "Continuously Variable Transmission", not constant velocity. The gear ratio can be varied continuously over the entire range between the extremes, rather than in a series of fixed steps like the 2004 alti.The horsepower difference is a function of a lot of things. The rear wheel drive engines are easier to make hp, because the "fore and aft" mounting allows for symmetry of the intake manifold and the exhaust manifolds. Have you noticed that the rwd cars have two throttle bodies? That an rwd car doesn't have one set of exhaust ports pointed toward the front of the car, so that the gasses have to make a 180 degree turn to get out the back? Even if both engines had the same cam timing and valve sizing and compression, the restrictions on the intake and exhaust would still cut into the power that the fwd layout could make.Buzzman wrote:Maybe I'm being a little anal here, but are you sure your transmission is a CVT?I didn't think Nissan had CVT's in the Altima's in 2004.You also mention your transmission banging in first, and then shifting into second. A CVT transmission doesn't really have a first, or second gear as such. That's why they call it a Constant Velocity Transmission.Just curious.
Good luck!mosswalker wrote:Never mind. Google is my friend. Hopefully nothing else got messed up in the transmission while this was dying.