2+0 or 2+2 ??

The Nissan 300ZX (Z32) general community discussion forum
User avatar
Mr. FairLadyZ
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:24 pm

Post





its in great shape. inside and out.


User avatar
tg
Posts: 3090
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:15 am

Post

nsrZ32 wrote:2 seater is the only way to go. The 2+2's are longer, the proportions don't look right, they're heavier, and lastly, a Z car was never meant to have back seats
QFT

edit: realized I already bashed 2+2's in this thread once

User avatar
raremotive
Posts: 3581
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 8:54 pm
Car: 04 Infiniti G35
Location: Stuck in the middle.

Post

looks pretty clean from the angles you show us. Enjoy!

User avatar
OUKNO
Posts: 754
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:36 pm
Car: 1990 Z32 NA, 1974 International Scout

Post

Like them both but wouldn't trade my 2+2 for one of those kicked in the @ssed 2+0's. Well unless it was a TT.........No probably not.

aidanair
Posts: 915
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:36 am
Car: '90 Nissan 300ZX TT
'93 Nissan 300ZX N/A (SOLD!)
Contact:

Post

notice those voting 2+2's have them. those voting 2 seaters have them. me on the other hand, i had a 2+2 and now have a 2 seater. the 2+2 gets worse gas mileage, looks more like a sedan than a coupe, slower, and impractical. nobody fits man. nobody, i promise. get a 2 seater and save urself the trouble. youl thank me one day.

User avatar
tg
Posts: 3090
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:15 am

Post

sometimes i wish I had two extra seats but usually you can stack two girls on top of each other in the passenger seat so its not a problem.

RHD + two girls in the passenger seat = some very very funny looks.

JDMZ32
Posts: 3219
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:30 am
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX NA slicktop 5spd red
Location: Auburn University, AL
Contact:

Post

GoodfellaFD3S wrote:2 seater
hey, FD guy, post some pics or, since this is a nissan forum, email them [email protected]. i absolutely love FDs. i was planning on getting one, but ended up with the Z (no, not saying that's a bad thing).

User avatar
clickdoc
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:51 am
Car: 1990 300zx NA

Post

I have had both -- the weight difference is only 100lbs -- take out the spare tire -- do a few mods that are lighter -- you will have pretty much the same power -- the extra length is a benefit on road courses -- and then turbo it -- great car 2+2 FTW

PS -- the backseat is only for little people but great in a pinch

Banging 6 in a row
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 3:02 pm
Car: '83 280zx (NA... gross)

Post

Will somebody please think of the children! what if you have a 2 seater and your wife makes you sell the car and buy a station wagon!? its my worst nightmare! I plan on buying a 2+ for my next z so i can deal with just this situation, not that i plan on getting married anytime soon but it never hurts to be prepared.I cant decide on a turbo 280zx or na z32 tho, what do you guys think?

sunny334
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:41 pm
Car: mitsubishi eclipse and 300zx
Contact:

Post

but they say 2+2 are good drift cars if they have tt swap done to it .. jus my opinion tho

User avatar
FusionR300zx
Posts: 1889
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:09 pm
Car: 1993 300zx/1997 240sx
Contact:

Post

sunny334 wrote:but they say 2+2 are good drift cars if they have tt swap done to it .. jus my opinion tho
hahahahahaahahlmao

no comment.

but anyway. i have a 2+2 and lets just say that i want a TT.

not even a na 2+0.

NA is just plain boring.

i've had my 2+2 for about 4-5 years now.

def annoying that you GOTTA floor it just to pass some1 up.

and putting premium in it hurts me because it's so slow.

wasting premium fuel IMO.


Return to “300ZX (Z32) General”