sicwitit wrote:Alright guys, so I went to about 4 shops today, (the Nissan dealer, Super Autobacs, Signal Auto, and another shop close by thats not a big name in tuning) and I have to say what I learned today is somewhat typical, and awesome at the same time.
Like most car companies, when designing their vehicles, they will often use parts from existing vehicles to keep some of the costs down. (My IS300 for example uses some of the same suspension, brake, door jam weather stripping, engine harnesses, etc, etc as the Chaser, Cresta, GS300, Supra N/A, and even RX300) and wouldn't ya know it, our Nissan Pathfinders are no different. The front struts were shared with a van here in Japan called the Elgrand. I know what your thinking...its a van! Who cares right?
Well, it turns out the Elgrand is a huge hit here in Japan...so much so that Nismo, Bilstien, HKS, Tein, Junction Produce, and a hand full of other companies all make struts/shock combo's that are direct bolt on replacements for our suspension. The pic above of the front Bilstien strut is infact from an Elgrand.....and I've got the model numbers.
ARE3-A165L
ARE3-A165R
I'm searching around now to get prices on them, but I've already found some Nismo struts, and shocks that are valved for a 4000lb van, and shouldn't have any issues handling the weight of our R50's.
this is my annual contribution to the forum...who knows what I might find next year?
Cheers!! JT
sicwitit wrote:And after a quick search....the holy grail of suspension!
Ohlins offers a coilover system!!!
I have no idea if the top hats will work, but there's no reason the stock ones wouldn't fit, or have some machined!!
http://page17.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/a ... v122869999


To add on top of the "KYB/Blistein" comment...Innovazn wrote:Benefits between coilovers and stock suspension?
Price comparison?
Benefits overall between KYB/Blistein?
Actually the real issue for the struts is the length of the piston shaft. For me, and many others that want to lift their truck, when we put stiffer springs, we actually only sacrifice down travel by keeping the truck sitting higher on the springs... This only brings another problem, which is the top out issue where you can hear loud bang when going over speed bump or offroading a bit hard.sicwitit wrote:I'm not sure honestly, I'd have to see them side by side to tell. Can someone post up some pics of the stock struts from 96-99 and 2001-2004?
I'm trying to learn everything I can about building struts from some of my race friends here, and some of the things I've done so far are taken stock struts for an Impreza, cut the mounting tabs off that mount the strut to the hub...moved the tabs that I cut off up on the strut body about 1 1/2 inches, and re-welded them to the strut body. This allowed me to lower the car, but retain the stock suspension travel. Very cool trick if you ask me, and I don't see how it can't be applied in some way to our suspension. I've noticed on some of the struts for the E50, they are designed to be 30mm lower then our struts via the spring perch is lower on the strut body...I'm wondering what the result of the suspension geometry would be if I were to take a longer strut, and weld all our tabs from a stock strut onto it, but with the spring perch higher on the body? it would give more piston travel....but we'd need longer springs with the same rates or slightly stiffer then stock to work right...maybe? IDK I'll run some ideas by my Sensei and see what he thinks. I know this idea has had to of been explored before..maybe he has some friends that helped build some of the dakkar/desert runners here.