Awesome AZ, I was hoping a guy like you would reply. Thanks.
Yeah, I like it because of the year (I was 10 yrs old when these came out) and the 80's styling. Had an '85 and '92 Supra once. Oh I know ALL about BAT. It's mostly for high-end 'special' cars (even if they are not special) and people who have too much money to lose buying a car they will never see, and don't care because they know nothing anyhow. I knew a guy who bought a '67 Fastback for 40k off there a few years ago and then had to pay another 30k more to get a paint and restoration.
The no-rear-seats (I am assuming the 2+2 came that way, it looked like it) and the not highly desirable status is all a plus for me. If I want crazy power, speed and room I've got another car, a 2016 German sedan for that. I've already got a restored '68 Mustang too, I'd not want to put more than 2-3k into fixing this appearance wise. DIY repairs and maybe a cheap paint job. Maybe even learn to DIY that. Biggest challenge/fun for me is fixing as much as I can myself....aside from being a cheapo
YES, saw that silly Hagerty valuation, and it's the first thing that Google pops up... and it is RIDICULOUS. I have seen through the link you just sent me and Hemmings you can get a very nice one in good appearance for 8-10k. So it's looking like more of a 2-3k car (prices are high for everything here I'm near Washington, D.C.)
Only the Turbos Models, if very clean and manual are commanding anything near top premiums for '86-'87. The later twin turbo Z's are the money cars. Just like the Supra's.
Anyhow, thanks for the comments. Are there any other big things on these cars? Like blows rear ends, rear main seals leaks, valve trains....etc. Are the engine and trans a nightmare to pull? I do have access to a lift at work.
I've done all that restoration mechanical type stuff but on my '68 Mustang. I did however send it off for professional paint work though =) I can't do it all.