18x9.5 and 18x11, DO NOT WANT TO STRETCH

Forum for Nissan wheel fitment, tire selection, suspension setup and brake discussions.
User avatar
FUJIBAYASHI
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:13 pm
Car: 1989 Silvia Qs

Post

What tire sizes should I get? I do not want to stretch at all and ZERO camber.But I would still like to have a low profile tire.


rob912
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 11:25 am
Car: 91 240 rb20

Post

your gunna need over fenders or flares

User avatar
FUJIBAYASHI
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:13 pm
Car: 1989 Silvia Qs

Post

i know this, i am only looking for an idea on sizes. fitment will be my problem.

User avatar
Dizel01
Posts: 399
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:15 pm
Car: 89 Silvia
Location: York, PA

Post

I have a slight stretch on my 18x9.5 using a 235/40/18 Federal 595s (those tires run wide). 245s would be what you want. As for 18x11 my brain can't comprehend anything but stretched sizes on that. May I ask why you want such lame tires sizes? You goin uber wide body?

ss82480
Posts: 535
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 12:11 pm
Car: 1992 240sx Coupe
Location: TX

Post

Just out of curiosity, why would putting a tire the same width as the wheel be considered a "lame" size?

User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

Probably cause stretching your tires is hip... or something.

ZX88
Posts: 1086
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 3:59 pm
Car: s13

Post

245/40 or 35 for the 18x9.5 and anywhere between 295-305/35 for the rears i guess. i hope your cutting your rear fenders and running over fenders. you better be running some serious power.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

I really don't understand how anyone can attempt to throw out tires sizes to answer your question properly without knowing the offsets of the wheels and whether you're running coils or not...

And why isn't this in the Wheels and Tires forum?

User avatar
Koshin
Posts: 14088
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:43 pm
Car: JP'd out Y32 Nissan Gloria GTU
750 hp '87 Buick Grand National
'63 Chevy Impala SS 327/4 speed
Location: ...in your garage stealing your wheels
Contact:

Post

Dizel01 wrote:I have a slight stretch on my 18x9.5 using a 235/40/18 Federal 595s (those tires run wide). 245s would be what you want. As for 18x11 my brain can't comprehend anything but stretched sizes on that. May I ask why you want such lame tires sizes? You goin uber wide body?
he may not be a JDm tyte drifter that drives his 600hp drift machine around like all of you other uber cool guys....

stretched tires are like disco, and theyll be gone soon enough

y0

User avatar
adrianfromthecastle
Posts: 18849
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 5:36 am
Car: 1992 Nissan 240sx
Location: California

Post

simmode1 wrote:
And why isn't this in the Wheels and Tires forum?
it is now.

User avatar
FUJIBAYASHI
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:13 pm
Car: 1989 Silvia Qs

Post

all i wanted was a general idea of tire sizes.ive never had wheels wider than 7 inches.like i said, fitment is my problem, and mine alone.

and excuse me for not posting this in the right place.thanks for the responses.

User avatar
adrianfromthecastle
Posts: 18849
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 5:36 am
Car: 1992 Nissan 240sx
Location: California

Post

265/30285/30?

User avatar
AZ89two4Tsx
Posts: 13634
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:02 am

Post

235/40/18 on my 8.5" wide wheel is not even 90 degrees. I wouldn't call it stretched, but it's about right for that size wheel.

245/40 won't even be close to 90 degrees, not stretched, or whatever you want to call it.


Darius
Posts: 4820
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 9:48 am
Car: RB25DET S14 - 665 WHP (SOLD)
Location: Chicagoland

Post

I don't understand how wheel offset correlates to tire width recommendation. And you do not need to cut fenders and add flares/widebody panels, etc. to fit an 11-inch wheel. A solid 3/4" pull and you can fit close to a 12-inch wheel out back. This is for an S14 anyway. I'm not sure how an S13 would work out.

With that said 245/40 and 295/35. Done.

User avatar
Gabes13
Posts: 2385
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:59 am
Car: rb20det s13
Location: St. Pete, Fl.

Post

Darius wrote:With that said 245/40 and 295/35. Done.
needs more meat.

255/40305/40

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

Darius wrote:I don't understand how wheel offset correlates to tire width recommendation. And you do not need to cut fenders and add flares/widebody panels, etc. to fit an 11-inch wheel. A solid 3/4" pull and you can fit close to a 12-inch wheel out back. This is for an S14 anyway. I'm not sure how an S13 would work out.

With that said 245/40 and 295/35. Done.
The OP has an S13 listed under his avatar. Offset is very important because it will determine whether or not any proposed combinations will clear his suspension and whether or not it can fit under stock fenders.

But if the OP is already resolved to go with fender flares/widebody, then that takes care of one issue. He actually may need to cut fenders and add flares/widebody panels, etc. to fit an 11-inch wheel if the wheels he's using has offsets so low that they stick out too far pass the body line of the car.

But inversely, he may be able to fit these using stock fenders if he has the right offsets. Even so, massive rolling and pulling are in his future.

Personally, I don't see the need to go past 265 width tires. If that's good enough for 500hp time attack Silvias, then it's good enough for me. Just get stickier compounds...
Modified by simmode1 at 11:32 AM 6/15/2009

Darius
Posts: 4820
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 9:48 am
Car: RB25DET S14 - 665 WHP (SOLD)
Location: Chicagoland

Post

Fitting the tires inside the wheel well aside, I stand behind the 235 and 295 combo. 245s and 305s will bulge just a little bit.

If he's getting 11-inch wheels, I'm assuming they will be custom ordered so he can pick the offset and figure out how to get them to fit. If not, that'll be a lesson learned the hard and expensive way.

My question for the OP is, why such wide wheels in the rear? If you're not pushing over 350 hp, street tires should provide adequate traction on a 10-inch wheel and save you a ton of money in the long run.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

Darius wrote:Fitting the tires inside the wheel well aside, I stand behind the 235 and 295 combo. 245s and 305s will bulge just a little bit.
Not disagreeing with you but... geez! Such huge staggers!

Here's a question: What is the point of getting wide tires for greater traction if your staggered setup just makes you understeer more? A 60mm stagger is excessive IMO...

I think the ideal size for s13's would be something like 235 & 255 or 245 & 265. Or 245 all around if you don't like staggering... Just my opinion, though.
Modified by simmode1 at 1:08 PM 6/15/2009

User avatar
phanatikz32
Posts: 2007
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:34 am
Car: 1991 NA to TT z32 biatch!

Post

FUJIBAYASHI wrote:What tire sizes should I get? I do not want to stretch at all and ZERO camber.But I would still like to have a low profile tire.
265/35/18295/35/18but....from the way you describe your set up why are you getting 11in wide wheels in back? you have 0 camber so you're obviously on stock suspension or subtle lowering springs with a 300 degree camber kit and you want to stagger your whees from 11 down to a 9.5? good luck ever turning, your wheels may turn but your cars gonna go straight. you can fit 11's in rear on stock fenders at 0 camber if you just sit at stock ride height but your car is gonna look like sin. if you absolutley have to run an 11 in the back then run a 10 in front and tuck your wheels apropriately with a proper drop and camber. and if you drop and camber your going to want to stretch tires to clear fenders. but thats just my opinion, if you want your car to look like a monster truck on baller a** wheels go for it, to each their own.

User avatar
Beems240sx
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 5:16 pm
Car: built S14, E30, R6 raven

Post

pandapants wrote:
needs more meat.

255/40305/40
completely agree. i have a 17x9.5 with 255/40 and its almost perfect. i plan to run 275 in the rear on the 9.5

User avatar
phanatikz32
Posts: 2007
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:34 am
Car: 1991 NA to TT z32 biatch!

Post

Beems240sx wrote:
completely agree. i have a 17x9.5 with 255/40 and its almost perfect. i plan to run 275 in the rear on the 9.5
i did that once... had ridonkulous grip in the back but it was too fat and rubbed my fenders due to my ride height. but if you're gripping then by all means run a 275 on a 9.5.

User avatar
FUJIBAYASHI
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:13 pm
Car: 1989 Silvia Qs

Post

rear overs are in my future, yes.suspension is already taken care of

18x9.5 +35 up front18x11 +30 rear

does this information make things clear?

as for the zero camber deal, negative camber looks like absolute s***. http://i44.tinypic.com/oggoyw.jpggoing for a look like that in the rear without the camber, and just a bit lower.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

With that front offset, I have to assume that you aree not using coilovers. So in that case... MASSIVE FRONT TIRES 4 JOO!

I say 275/35 & 305/35. I can only imagine what kind of power plant would need this kind of rubber.

Post pics when done!


Return to “Nissan Tires, Wheels, Brakes and Suspension”