Rex wrote:FWIW, effeciency should be used as a guide, but I recommend against it as a determing factor, especially when comparing different brands. There's no "standard" and the testing is done differently. I had a McCauley sub in a CRX years back and according to the effeciency number I should have been dissappointed since I only had the back half of a Fosgate Power 300 bridged on it, but it was overwhelming, even had to keep the bass "defeasted".
For sure, different subs vary so much.
Another just as important (if not more important) factor is the box the sub comes in. If you have an awesome sub in a crappy box -> it will sound crappy. If you have a crappy sub in an awesome box -> it will still sound crappy, but to a less extent.
Anyways, I ran 2 10" Rockford Fosgates entry level Punch subs w/ a 200 watt Kenwood amp and that thing BUMPED the hell out of my 240 coupe. Sound quality wasn't quite there because I didn't know how to tune it correctly and did not have all the crossover jazz, but that thing was LOUD. You can get a pair of 12" for under 300 pair. or under 200 for lower punch entry level ones.
I've had 2 different Rockford Fosgates subs and would recommend them since they are also usually under rated.
I now run 2 12" Fusion subs w/ 1 amp each, that thing is much better sound quality, but doesn't "shake" as much since they are in relatively smaller sub boxes.