11.90@121 mph last night

Discuss the RB20, RB25 and RB26 series engines.
fito
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 4:27 pm

Post

Well took the car last night to the track with still the small turbo (it should have around 450-500hp).

1.93--60 ft11.904--et121---Mph


Joe
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 8:29 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Post

small turbo...go to hell :P

goofynick6
Posts: 1216
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 9:58 am
Car: 1995 S14.5 RB20DET

Post

Nice...ever figure out what blew the other turbo's?

Nick

S13Sil-line
Posts: 526
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 10:02 am
Car: Full throttle-*** out sideways

Post

You call yours small?!?! I would hate to hear what you would call mine.

PANGES
Posts: 94
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 6:52 pm

Post

S13Sil-line wrote:You call yours small?!?! I would hate to hear what you would call mine.


Are we still talking about turbos or something else...? :firedevil

Wykid 240
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 6:08 pm

Post

At that mph shouldn't you be running low 11's or high 10's?

fito
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 4:27 pm

Post

I say small turbo because Iam running my brothers Turbo. This is o trim and my turbo (the one on the pictures is P trim). The problem I was having was lubrication, I had a 90 degrees elbow in the oil inlet and was taking the oil supply from a Grex adapter, that is acctually for oil cooler. We changed the 90 degrees elbow for a straigth fitting and took the oil supply from the original block outlet and done! no more turbo failure! Iam in the process of changing now to my original bigger turbo. Let's see!

goofynick6
Posts: 1216
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 9:58 am
Car: 1995 S14.5 RB20DET

Post

Hmm...so a 90 deg elbow is bad....I wouldn't think it would restrict that much; but I'll try to avoid using one.

Nick

SillyRB
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 7:02 pm

Post

fito wrote:Well took the car last night to the track with still the small turbo (it should have around 450-500hp).

1.93--60 ft11.904--et121---Mph
Just out of curosity.....First of all congrats on the run 11.9 is NOT a bad time but on the real.....

11.9 @ 121 w 450 - 500 HP is NOT GOOD ...... That is BAD......Are u Sure that w the smaller turbo u probably putting around 350-400 down ...... 500 hp Does NOT equal a 121 trap speed !!

DSMs_Suck
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 7:55 am
Car: Money, *****es, and 40s

Post

SillyRB wrote:Just out of curosity.....First of all congrats on the run 11.9 is NOT a bad time but on the real.....

11.9 @ 121 w 450 - 500 HP is NOT GOOD ...... That is BAD......Are u Sure that w the smaller turbo u probably putting around 350-400 down ...... 500 hp Does NOT equal a 121 trap speed !!


would have to agree there

Wykid 240
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 6:08 pm

Post

Wykid 240 wrote:At that mph shouldn't you be running low 11's or high 10's?


That's what I said. . . .

Imissmyturbo
Posts: 757
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 1:55 pm
Car: Car's, Turbo's, sking
Contact:

Post

I was going to say that as well. With 450-500 WHP traps should be close to 130.

SillyRB
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 7:02 pm

Post

A car that has 450 - 500 RwHp that traps 121 has to weight about 3400 lbs...... SO unless ur 240 gained about 500 lbs the Hp #'s on ur run are way wrong .....

UR car trapped 121. Plug in the weight of 3400 lbs (Just to prove a point). Then we can say u have 475 HP...U honestly have about 390ish HP. That would make ur Hp calculation correct.

On ur old set up.....587 RWHPIn all REALness we'll say that ur car weighs 2900 lbsSo with that weight and Ur HP of 587 Plug in the Number of 137.5 as ur MPH (Mile Per Hour) ur have a138 mph car....

USE THE LINK TO DO THE MATH...Physics does NOT lie, regardless of other vairables #'s are pretty accurate

I saw the dyno graph on ur turbo the PT...

http://www.3dstreetracing.com/

USE THE >>> (Horsepower From MPH Calculation:)

Do the Math....Plug in the #'s

Current set up

****............FAST as FU*K

In all realness though that car is SICK!!!

DSMs_Suck
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 7:55 am
Car: Money, *****es, and 40s

Post

SillyRB wrote:A car that has 450 - 500 RwHp that traps 121 has to weight about 3400 lbs...... SO unless ur 240 gained about 500 lbs the Hp #'s on ur run are way wrong .....

UR car trapped 121. Plug in the weight of 3400 lbs (Just to prove a point). Then we can say u have 475 HP...U honestly have about 390ish HP. That would make ur Hp calculation correct.

On ur old set up.....587 RWHPIn all REALness we'll say that ur car weighs 2900 lbsSo with that weight and Ur HP of 587 Plug in the Number of 137.5 as ur MPH (Mile Per Hour) ur have a138 mph car....

USE THE LINK TO DO THE MATH...Physics does NOT lie, regardless of other vairables #'s are pretty accurate

I saw the dyno graph on ur turbo the PT...

http://www.3dstreetracing.com/

USE THE >>> (Horsepower From MPH Calculation:)

Do the Math....Plug in the #'s

Current set up

****............FAST as FU*K

In all realness though that car is SICK!!!


Do realize those "calculators" are a HUGE guess. They dont take much of anything into account, like tires, gearing, shifting, powerband, etc. Although you could use it to get a rough idea.

I was basing my judgement on other 240s with similar power/weight ratios... Either way 11.9 @ 121 isnt bad... my guess would be like 350-400 whp

Murray

fito
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 4:27 pm

Post

Well, I have been thinkng the same. All HP calculators say around 390hp. I will take the car to the dyno this week(I installed back the big turbo) and let you guys know.

PANGES
Posts: 94
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 6:52 pm

Post

fito wrote:Well, I have been thinkng the same. All HP calculators say around 390hp. I will take the car to the dyno this week(I installed back the big turbo) and let you guys know.


ooo. go run it at the tracks again with the big turbo too

DETurbine
Posts: 491
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 12:49 pm
Car: Nissan S13 RB25
Contact:

Post

what turbo did you have on there when you ran that time?

specs?

Wykid 240
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 6:08 pm

Post

Have you run it yet?

User avatar
accel junky
Posts: 1108
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 7:22 pm
Contact:

Post

I'd like to see some vids of it running on the track or street.

User avatar
lyon23
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 4:16 pm
Car: 95 240sx
Location: Florida

Post

11.90 good time.. my question is did u have slicks or street tires and do you have a lsd.. I was asking cuz of that 1.93 60 foot. I ran 2.1 60ft on my rb20 stock without and lsd.


Return to “RB20DET / RB25DET / RB26DETT Forum”