Versus an illegal engine that is slightly faster than stock?yelnatsch517 wrote:I think it would be best to get wheels, brakes, suspension, exhaust and a bolt on turbo for the KA. If you get the SR, for $6500, whats left of the 10k after the car, you would end up with an illegal engine that will run slightly faster than stock.
eh, with the extra .4 liters i wouldnt care as long as it can rev to 7500 or so. if these trannies are anything like dsm trannies you dont want to rev to high anyways.Dookie wrote:SR valvetrain = hydraulic lifters = bad at high revs
KA valvetrain = solid lifters = good for high revs, damn that long stroke
but SR + tomei solid lifter conversion = high, safe revs
Just some word of thought.
you wouldn't understand. and i'm too lazy to make you.if you just want to drag race then it doesn't matter what motor you use. just make up your own mind. and if you want to drag race, stick with your DSM. you'll go faster for cheaper and launch better.iwantawd wrote:im a dsm guy so could you explain why? if i got a 240 i would definitly turbo the ka. the cost of getting a SR and then building it is rediculous. that same money would make a killer 2.4liter. i just dont understand you guys since i have no info on the differences that make the SR better. ive heard that the KA is a "truck motor" or something like that. i dont except that as a good excuse at all. please explain.
hahaha.. i thought you were the thread starter.but in response to your comment, tehre are other things to look at than just torque.iwantawd wrote:what in gods name are you talking about man. im not getting a 240, i said if i did, and my choice of engine has nothing to do with drag racing. even with drifting or autocrossing, having more torque available from the KA would be more beneficial.sorry you are too lazy
What are you talking about? The SR is illegal no matter where you are in the United States. He has a better chance going with the KA in terms of legality. And yes, Cali has the strictest automotive laws in US, so if it passes here, it will pass in any other state, ie. whatever inspection you guys do we do also and more. At least it should unless he finds someone like you who has something against turbo KA's.Nismo_Freak wrote:
Versus an illegal engine that is slightly faster than stock?
The Greddy KA-T is only legal in California because of CARB certification.
CARB = California Air Research Board
Greddy states they are 50-state legal... I happen to be a Texas state inspector and CARB certification is meerly a tiny sticker on the engine bay I get to look at while I fail your car. Just because something floats in Cali doesn't mean it will float everywhere.
ok since hes not bringing up any points whatsoever someone else care to jump in. i am under the impression that the only reasons everyone sweats the SR is because people dont know how to build a turbo motor and those are readily available. of course they are also JDM which is bling bling to a lot of people too.ChunkiDori wrote:
hahaha.. i thought you were the thread starter.but in response to your comment, tehre are other things to look at than just torque.
The SR is not illegal in all states cause some states don't have emissions i.e parts of Tennessee and all OF Arkansasyelnatsch517 wrote:
What are you talking about? The SR is illegal no matter where you are in the United States. He has a better chance going with the KA in terms of legality. And yes, Cali has the strictest automotive laws in US, so if it passes here, it will pass in any other state, ie. whatever inspection you guys do we do also and more. At least it should unless he finds someone like you who has something against turbo KA's.
well you know what, i dont think its been answered at all, if you would read a little this is an ongoing discussion, ka vs. sr vs. rb vs. ca and so on. and it will never end. whose to say what engine you "have to" use.iwantawd wrote:i think it has been answered though, jdm hype and lack of knowledge.