Tattoos are permanent, most body piercings (like for earrings) are not.Mr1der wrote:[
How's a tattoo any different than letting your child get body piercings?
I agree. It would have been one thing if he wanted like a tattoo of a pro wrestler but it was his brothers name for crying out loud.DJBeasy wrote:Mom's consent should have been enough. A name and basketball jersey number, thats it. Non-offensive, it may have even helped him cope with the loss. Is it illegal for a child to get their ears pierced in GA? Doubt it, neither should a tattoo.
Says the man with the Kelly Clarkson avatar....Jesda wrote:Tattoos are gayer than Clay Aiken
Bubba1 wrote: 2. A 10 yr old's body is not done growing, which means whatever you ink now can distort as they grow. So what seems like a nice spontaneous gesture, could look bad in just a few years.
3. The tattoo might be what YOU want, but a 10 yr old child is not capable of deciding for themselves if that is something they want for the rest of their lives.
We're not talking about schooling, life saving drugs, or special operations here, we're talking about a cosmetic adornment. So the special circumstance argument doesn't apply.
The law is what it is. If you feel that strongly about using a tattoo to remember a departed loved one, get 'ir done... to yourself. But not your child. When your kid turns 18, if they feel they still want it, let it be THEIR adult choice, not yours.
In the first post:Dattebayo wrote:And just to be devil's advocate, what about if the child is sick? There are certain types of imaging that require a tattoo on the body to line up the MRI scanner... Can we lock up the doctor for ordering it on a child too?
She needs to learn how to eat fried chicken. She wastes so much meat by not cleaning off the bone.numbnuts240 wrote:stalking miss clarkson hardly qualifies as gay.
btw, jesda, tonight is garbage night in her neighborhood
RobPaulson wrote:
Anyone ever seen that movie freakenomics where they actually analyze people with dumb a** names and the kind of people they'll grow up to be based on them? Its on Netflix... highly recommend.
worldisgrand wrote:I myself have tattoo's, I am also a tattoo artist, I am also a parent: If a child is asking for a tattoo I would definitely have to consider the situation and if he or she is really wanting too. Now a 10 year old is a little young still, but someone 16 or 17 I don't see how someone can go from 17 one day to 18 the next and there mindset changes that much. If someone of any age is willing to get a tattoo and take the pain more power to them. However, what I can't stand is when parents do this:
http://www.sojones.com/wordpress/wp-con ... ercing.jpg
You cannot tell me that that is less harmful than a 10 year old wanting and getting a tattoo. Especially one that is in memory of someone. This is why my wife and I are waiting until my daughter can ask us if she can get her ears pierced.
And yes piercings are forever, its called a scar and scar tissue, just cause its not brightly colored and shoved in your face doesn't mean it isn't permanent. So anyone that says piercings aren't permanent obviously has never gotten one and should climb back into the little box they live in. Cause you obviously don't know what your talking about.
I've read some people on here talk about how at that age they don't know what they want and yet I hear all the time about how this person doesn't like there tattoo or this person regrets getting this. I've come to realize that most of you don't know what you want regardless of your age. I don't hear you raising hell about the tribes that use rings to stretch girls necks or shove bones through noses of children. So stop your boo hooing about this mother did this. The people you should be worrying about is your own children and whether or not there getting tattoo's by guys like me. LOL