1,626 Miles on ONE Tank of Gas

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

I don't know whether to say :confused: or :bs:

http://www.thecarconnection.com/news/10 ... d+Blogs%29

Wish I could drive one for a month and find out for myself.


User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Yeah but they had to sit in a Passat for 1600 miles. I'll keep my 17mpg thanks.

User avatar
asoomal
Posts: 2374
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:45 pm
Car: 2001 Subaru Impreza L 5MT (Daily)
1992 Nissan 240SX SE 5MT w/HICAS (Being restored)
Location: Canada

Post

Honestly thought it was gonna be a Versa.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

My Volvo S60 got 630 miles per tank. That -seems- nice but it gets boring on a road trip. I'd fill up at half a tank.

I should have kept that car.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

That's an amazing figure even with a pair of hypermiler drivers. I have not been a huge modern VW fan, but after driving a couple of VW's newest generation diesels both on and off track, I might have to reconsider my position. This newest generation Tdi's are torquey, very quiet, competent, and get great gas mileage. Naysayers should test drive one. I think they'd be surprised.

If I were looking for a new economy car, I'd probably look at a diesel before a hybrid.

User avatar
300ZXttZMAN
Posts: 6800
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT 5spd pearl white

DD: 2008 Nissan Frontier NISMO pkg 4x4 Crew Cab
Location: Sulphur, LA 70665
Contact:

Post

asoomal wrote:Honestly thought it was gonna be a Versa.
This :chuckle:
MinisterofDOOM wrote:Yeah but they had to sit in a Passat for 1600 miles. I'll keep my 17mpg thanks.
THIS THIS THIS, for sure...

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

Bubba1 wrote:If I were looking for a new economy car, I'd probably look at a diesel before a hybrid.
Diesels are so much better than they were a few years ago. Europe loves them and we're reaping the benefits.

Jeremy from Top Gear did 800 miles in a A8 diesel. He said he never went over 1600rpm. I can't believe the Passat could do 1600 miles without some seriously careful driving.

User avatar
NolimitZ32
Posts: 7042
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:07 am
Car: 91 AG2 2+0 TTMT swap/E39 BMW 540i6/E53 4.6is Dinan S3
Location: Houston, TX

Post

JC all did something like 800 miles in the TTDiesel Jag a few seasons ago as well. they really are becoming amazing. And even though everyone hates CVT I say they need to start combining CVT and Diesel, its the best of both worlds, could even have an eco mode a street mode and a sport mode.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

NolimitZ32 wrote:JC all did something like 800 miles in the TTDiesel Jag a few seasons ago as well. they really are becoming amazing. And even though everyone hates CVT I say they need to start combining CVT and Diesel, its the best of both worlds, could even have an eco mode a street mode and a sport mode.
CVT and Diesel are, in theory, a great matchup. If you think about it, CVTs could be HUGELY beneficial for trucks hauling trailers. Whether they're Peterbilts or F350s. Scalability between unloaded and loaded would be fantastic. But the CVT's biggest weakness is torque. They just can't take it. Toroidal-type CVTs handle it better than belt-type, but they still can't take it like a modern heavy-duty automatic or manual can. There's a reason Nissan only puts CVTs in their FWD cars in the US, and it is NOT that Infiniti would go under if they tried to sell CVT-only G37s (because if you ask Nissan, that's not true). It's because even the toroidal longitudinal CVT they use in the more economical models of Skyline and other rear-drivers in Japan is NOT up to the torque of the hotrod V6s and V8s we demand of our cars in the US.
You can get a Skyline 250GT with a CVT. You can even get a Fuga 350GT with a CVT. But you can't get a Skyline 370GT or a Fuga 450GT with a CVT. Not because the CVT sucks for performance or would kill sales (again...those are true but Nissan would never admit it) but because it CANNOT TAKE THE TORQUE that is output by those motors. It can't take the abuse. The Extroid (the name for Nissan's longitudinal toroidal CVT design) is the toughest CVT Nissan makes, and it can barely stand the torque of a 3.5 liter V6.

Definitely not a valid diesel economy solution at this point.

User avatar
NolimitZ32
Posts: 7042
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:07 am
Car: 91 AG2 2+0 TTMT swap/E39 BMW 540i6/E53 4.6is Dinan S3
Location: Houston, TX

Post

1. Yes I realize full well that CVTs aren't known for their ability to handle torque. 2. Not saying its viable at this very moment but that it is a great idea altogether if the opportunity to make money off the idea were to arise I guarantee you within weeks there would be a CVT available that could handle all the torque you could throw at it. At this point the R&D costs out-weight the market analysts' supposed benefits so no one is doing anything about it. I for one would totally drive a TDI if I could get 60mpg out of it and with the push of a button turn it into a raging monster. Best of both worlds, but as we've covered on this forum many times before We are not your average consumer so we must suffer at the hands of a market shaped by automotive incompetents, soccer moms, and Joe Bill Bobs who wouldn't know a good solid vehicle if it were spelled out on cue cards.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

I'm still waiting patiently for a CVT that offers a user-controlled linear ratio lever. No notched gears, just a sliding lever. All the benefit of the CVT with all the fun of user involvement (less the clutch, of course). Push forward for shorter ratio, pull back for taller.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote: Definitely not a valid diesel economy solution at this point.
Agree, not yet, but soon perhaps. Given the increasing success of the new generation diesels, combined with an increasing amount of gas stations (at least here in the northeast) beginning to offer diesel right beside gasoline, I can see it becoming much more than a niche product.


Return to “General Chat”