http://www.thecarconnection.com/news/10 ... d+Blogs%29
Wish I could drive one for a month and find out for myself.
Thisasoomal wrote:Honestly thought it was gonna be a Versa.
THIS THIS THIS, for sure...MinisterofDOOM wrote:Yeah but they had to sit in a Passat for 1600 miles. I'll keep my 17mpg thanks.
Diesels are so much better than they were a few years ago. Europe loves them and we're reaping the benefits.Bubba1 wrote:If I were looking for a new economy car, I'd probably look at a diesel before a hybrid.
CVT and Diesel are, in theory, a great matchup. If you think about it, CVTs could be HUGELY beneficial for trucks hauling trailers. Whether they're Peterbilts or F350s. Scalability between unloaded and loaded would be fantastic. But the CVT's biggest weakness is torque. They just can't take it. Toroidal-type CVTs handle it better than belt-type, but they still can't take it like a modern heavy-duty automatic or manual can. There's a reason Nissan only puts CVTs in their FWD cars in the US, and it is NOT that Infiniti would go under if they tried to sell CVT-only G37s (because if you ask Nissan, that's not true). It's because even the toroidal longitudinal CVT they use in the more economical models of Skyline and other rear-drivers in Japan is NOT up to the torque of the hotrod V6s and V8s we demand of our cars in the US.NolimitZ32 wrote:JC all did something like 800 miles in the TTDiesel Jag a few seasons ago as well. they really are becoming amazing. And even though everyone hates CVT I say they need to start combining CVT and Diesel, its the best of both worlds, could even have an eco mode a street mode and a sport mode.
Agree, not yet, but soon perhaps. Given the increasing success of the new generation diesels, combined with an increasing amount of gas stations (at least here in the northeast) beginning to offer diesel right beside gasoline, I can see it becoming much more than a niche product.MinisterofDOOM wrote: Definitely not a valid diesel economy solution at this point.