The city mileage is what I'm concerned about; that's about 90% of my driving. I'll check out the MAF post. Thanks!fleurys wrote:20 mpg on the highway is not bad at all... but the last symptoms you said about the trans slipping has been related to a bad MAF by many. Look for the maxima MAF replacement post. It will save a lot of money compared to the pathfinder's one.
S.
Hey guys...Innovazn wrote:winter gas kills
its the additives. youll see the difference when spring comes around.
For my 01.5 PF, I depressed the MAF sensor's clip until it clicked, and then removed the connector. Be aware that you most likely require tamper-resistant T20 Torx bits. I found a set at Sears for $7.99 + tax.bobsten wrote:So I went and bought the MAF sensor cleaner but I can't seem to figure out how that power plug that connects to the MAF sensor comes off. I would assume by the arrows on the plug that one is supposed to push down on the green clip and lift the plug up and off, but this never seems to work...
I have a 96 SE 4wd and i uses to get 11&1/2 Miles to the gallon i recently changed my spark plugs and now recieve 16 miles to the gallon and the type of damage on the spark plugs was usuall nothing uncommon. My transmission will take a a second or two to engage when i put it in drive. My main question is will the maxima MAF replacement fit on my car. and is there any thing else to inprove this. and what year maxima am i looking for or am i looking for one with the same size engine.fleurys wrote:20 mpg on the highway is not bad at all... but the last symptoms you said about the trans slipping has been related to a bad MAF by many. Look for the maxima MAF replacement post. It will save a lot of money compared to the pathfinder's one.
S.
well, i guess i might do the drain test on a long highway trip one of these day just to see if the highway only mileage is significantly better than what i got in my current mixed city highway driving.Chuck Tribolet wrote:Premium would probably make a small improvement in MPG, about the same as the increase in cost. ....
I've gotten 380ism miles out of my '01, with a reserve. It was from Kelso, OR to about Arbuckle, CA on I-5, which is about 380 miles.
The gas I put in worked out to 21 MPG. But that was a one-time occurrence.
Want range? Get a Corvette. We got 442 miles from Morgan Hil to Indio this Christmas, and put 17ish gallons in. That was ONLY
26 MPG. I've seen 29. Or the old Porche 914. I've heard tales of SF Bay area to Seattle on one tank.
Chuck
If the mileage on the 3.5 L engine is about 2 mpg worse, that could acc for the decreased range i am experiencing i guess... still i feel like i am getting just significantly less range compared to my old 97 pf. The rating on the new 4.0 L seems to be equal to that of the 3.3 L engine ironically.....Chuck Tribolet wrote:Who cruises at just 70? AZ rural freeway limit is 75.
Besides a really tall top gear, the 'vette has very low wind resistance.
The '01 is my third pathfinder. Before that I had a '95 and an '87. The '95 probably got 1 MPG better on the freeway than the '01.
Around town is hard to say, I tend to hot rod the '01 a bit more.
Chuck