ace0073 wrote:Questions, questions, questions .
First off, could you please explain the difference between/advantages of a stock configured crank and a fully-counterweighted crank?
First off the differences between half weighted and fully counter weighted. Both cranks are of course fully balanced. But in the manner in which they are balanced the inertia can spin and direct more power to the outer axis of the shafts (Halfweighted crank). Or the weights can be evenly distributed through out the crank not just at the axis or end of the snout and flywheel (fully counterweighed crank). What makes fully counterweighted cranks more popular is the evenly distributed weights across the crank. This reduces torsional stress and flex (which reduces disruptive harmonics at higher RPM that eat up HP and torque). Now anything that would create torsional stress or flex is consuming energy that could of been used in more momentum. Positive momentum makes more HP and torque. A halfweighted crank can not perform at the level that a fully counter weited crank can because having the weights only at the outer ends of the crank allows flexing to ocvur between the center of the crank or when down ward piston momentum is applied at the ends of the crank. Which in most cases the crank snout can snap or a rod can be thrown.Overall in a fully counterweighted crank the bearing loads are reduced.
ace0073 wrote:I am a little confused on the subject. I called Import Performance about their KA stroker kit and asked if there particular crank was fully counterweighted?
answer: we use the stock crank and modify and heat treat it so no.
Then I asked if it will be a problem?
answer: you do not need a fully counterweighted crank in a 4-cylinder (or straight six)it makes NO difference. Not safer, no more revs; its unecessary.
Then he goes on the explain how he only knows of 3 fully counterweighted 4-cyl cranks that were offered (factory), blah, blah, blah!
The guys at import performance have no clue what they are talking about only the best of all the four cylinder engines in there class make more peek HP and Torque.
Research the DATSUN/Nissan FJ24 engineHonda/Acura K24a enginesDodge SRT-4 engines use fully counterweighted cranks.Even the SR20det uses a fully counterweighted crank and can run in to higher RPMs than the KA.
All the greatest 4 banger street cars that used fully counterweighted cranks dominate any that are half weighted.
ace0073 wrote:Also can this crank be ordered as a stroker crank?
The KA crank is already a stroker crank at 96mm. I don't know why any one would want to stroke it anymore than that since it would decrease rev and increase redline. Brian Crower claims there kit to be a stroker kit which technically it is slightly stroked to 102mm.
Here is an article you should read to educate yourself a bit on fully counterweighted and AERO crank shafts. Hopefully this article will help you grasp the concept of why a fully counterweighted is desprately needed in the KA engine.
http://www.circletrack.com/tec...ology/ ... ec....html
Edited: I originally stated the Brian Crower Crank was 91mm, after reading over the specs it is 102mm, with up to a 91mm bore. Have to make the correction.
Modified by Bigvinnie at 12:15 PM 7/31/2007