An owner of one the quicker Q's on this forum Sijoko did this mod to his 94 Q45 and a few FX45 owners were looking at doing e-Fan mods as well.Fred D. wrote:Has any one here converted their Q to a electric fan instead of the belt driven one.
Here's a writeup showing how to accomplish this conversion with the very same fan on a Mustang.Flagship-Q wrote:I removed my mechanical fan 2 weekends ago. I noticed that the motor will windup faster (less things to spin I guess) and I did gain 1-2 mpg also. I'm getting a 2 speed electric fan fron a early to mid 90's Ford Taurus 3.8l (from car-part.com for about $30) that has more than enough cooling power for the Q. Many jeepers that do a V8 conversion recommend this stout fan. I'll let ya know!
All true. I'd much rather have two fans than one. Wonder if there are any hi capacity alternators out there for a Q? If alternator has to be upgraded, which it does, then the logical time for this mod would be right after alternator failure.Q45tech wrote:Maximum flow UP TO 2000CFM unfortunately that means in free air not drawing thru a condenser or radiator with back pressure of engine bay.
Always a good idea to have 2 electric fans to limp home on one when one fails.
Just buy additional alternator insurance!................as oem 110 amp is already stressed.
The mechanical fan is of course more reliable... less that can go wrong with it. Your warming/cooling issue may be caused by the thermostat staying open. When's the last time you had it changed?Q45denver wrote:My 1995 seems to take a long time to warm up and either there is something wrong with the condensor fan coming on when cold (I've noticed this several times) or I need to switch to an electric engine fan to better control cooling
Yep, there's a real strong possibility that the thermostat is your problem. Normally, the Q warms up amazingly fast (120 seconds in summertime, perhaps double that during the winter). I've never driven another vehicle that came up to operating temperature as quick.DrewQ45 wrote:Your warming/cooling issue may be caused by the thermostat staying open.
...which is more than offset by the shorter battery and alternator life...Q45denver wrote:a secondary benefit for an electric fan might be longer engine and injector life since the fan runs after the engine is shut off.
The existing shroud would probably envelope the fan unless you were thinking of actually mounting the fan on the shroud? (disaster) Each fan should come with a shroud of it's own allowing it a good seal against the radiator. I would think that getting rid of the existing shroud would be desirable since it extends well into the engine bay taking up valuable space and making things much harder to work on.Q45denver wrote:I was thinking a Spal 16 inch puller fan with a variable speed controller would fit well within the existing shroud. Would 2400 cfm be enough for this application?
Increased reliablity of alternator and batttery offsets increased relaibility of engine, injectors, waterpump, hoses, etc?Skibane wrote:
...which is more than offset by the shorter battery and alternator life...
BOTH fans will fail if the relay gets moisture or dirt inside it, or the thermostat contacts open up, or the fuse holder gets corroded, or the wiring insulation gets chaffed and shorts out, or...
As DrewQ45 mentioned, the belt-driven fan is inherently more reliable. Sometimes, the simplest solution is the best one.
Fan comes with solid mounting brackets. Not recommended to mount to core except for short periods of time. The mechanical fan is more in the way than the existing shroud. The dual fans usually come with a shroud but the singles are designed to work with the existing shroud. I've had several Hondas that had tiny alternators and batteries with electric fans that seemed to work just fine. These cars with electric fans seem to warm up much faster.DrewQ45 wrote:
The existing shroud would probably envelope the fan unless you were thinking of actually mounting the fan on the shroud? (disaster) Each fan should come with a shroud of it's own allowing it a good seal against the radiator. I would think that getting rid of the existing shroud would be desirable since it extends well into the engine bay taking up valuable space and making things much harder to work on.
IMHO, switching to electric only makes sense if there are upgraded alternators available for the Q, something I have not seen. There are a few things on this car that have barely, if any room for expansion... namely the charging and cooling systems. (probably why it warms so fast)
These guys claim up to 15% improvement in mileage.Q45tech wrote:I'm not sure that removing mechanical fan would have any effect on EPA style mpg since no test has very much rapid acceleration.
Measuring the coolant temperature and the resilence to maintain 174F will only be known in a July August Traffic jam.
Luckily it will be easy to rip out and trash electric fans that don't do the job=======keep the old fan in the trunk and some tools.
Q45denver wrote:Increased reliablity of alternator and batttery offsets increased relaibility of engine, injectors, waterpump, hoses, etc?
Very much so. Simpler by design. All the fan failures I've seen have been due to plastic disentegration of the blades. The fan clutch is very reliable and will outlast any electric motor (brush wear) 3+ times over.Q45denver wrote: A mechanical fan with a clutch is more simple than an electric motor with a thermostat?
Still not sure if the condensor fans run independent of the A/C being on.Q45tech wrote:Start and stop temps and speed vs temp [94 tri speed fan] are all fully outlined in your FSM............controlled by ecu from coolant temp sensor and Ac cpu.
To me thermostat should be replaced every 3 years, 4 at max. But then I like things to behave as brand new.
Yes, your lucky, but I've had four engines and several set of injectors in my 1990. Never had an alternator fail however. I think some of the new electirc fans are rated for 50,000 hours with nylon reinforced blades.DrewQ45 wrote:
It's all relative. Take my Q... @ 211K on original engine + injectors, I doubt if an eletrical fan would improve longevity much/any on OEM design. Alternator failure, however, would arrive in a speedier fashion.
Very much so. Simpler by design. All the fan failures I've seen have been due to plastic disentegration of the blades. The fan clutch is very reliable and will outlast any electric motor (brush wear) 3+ times over.