Nissan Forums | Infiniti Forums NICOclub staff, History and Advertising eMail NICOclub Webmaster Advertising on NICOclub Nissan forums
 
          
Active Topics

Quick Reply  Print  Email  Subscribe RSS  Help
 So you want to buy a Skyline in the US....First  < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >  Last
Author Post
USsil80

Offline

1675 posts

minot nd
9-7-2003

 « Re: (tmiller42085)


http://www.zeroyon.com/forums/...=8819

somebody that did it with a rx7



get sideways and fly

part of the less than 1% protecting our freedoms

USAF

Count Zero



Offline

354 posts
1990 Skyline GT-R, Federal Legal & fully registered.
St. Louis MO
11-23-2006

 « Re: (USsil80)


Quote, originally posted by USsil80 »
http://www.zeroyon.com/forums/...=8819

somebody that did it with a rx7


Lot easier to bring over a car that's got an existing chassis here....the FD chassis has already been crash-tested.



1990 Skyline GT-R (Mostly stock), 2000 F150 (almost bone stock), 1988 Mustang track car (not stock at all), 2008 Harley Softail NightTrain (also not stock)

"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body. The goal is to skid in broadside; tires smoking, body all dented, leaking fluids, the fuel gauge just about on empty, thoroughly used up and worn out, and loudly proclaiming---- "Holy ****---What a Ride!"

celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (Count Zero)


Quote, originally posted by Count Zero »

Lot easier to bring over a car that's got an existing chassis here....the FD chassis has already been crash-tested.

incorrect!!! it doesnt make it easyer if the car your importing has a US counter part.

Gold Digger
RB/Skyline Moderator



Offline

5845 posts
1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec Midnight Purple 50cc Honda Zoomer
Somewhere across the pond
4-11-2004

 « Re: (celm)


How about this?

Since no one seems to have the correct answers, or wishes to share with the Admin staff to prove they can do it, let's not talk about it anymore.

So many people out there claim that they can get them state legal. That DOES NOT make them federally legal, and it still poses the possiblilty that it could get impounded, crushed, etc.

Turtle, Celm.

If you guys have some insider info on how to do it and get it done right, by all means, contact Greg and I, and let us in on what's up. We won't leak your info to anyone else that you haven't already given it too. We just want to make sure you guys aren't trying to scam people out of several thousand dollars, or worse yet, sell someone a car they can't drive on the street. If we like what we see, maybe we can set something up just for our NICO brethren.

I just don't want people getting bad info, or no info at all on what they are getting into.






GET YOUR STUFF POWDER COATED!
NICO's GT-R club portal!
celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (C33LaurelRacer)


this is one of 2 parts of my process that i share publicly about titling

Motor Vehicle Titling and Registration(this is from the DOT web site)


NHTSA is not responsible for regulating the operation of motor vehicles on public roads in the U.S. or for titling or registering motor vehicles for such operation. That is instead the responsibility of the individual States. Some States may require a manufacturer's certificate of origin (MCO) or manufacturer's statement of origin (MSO) to register a new motor vehicle. These are not federally required documents. NHTSA, therefore, is not in a position to offer guidance to prospective vehicle manufacturers or vehicle purchasers on obtaining a needed MCO or MSO. Consumers with questions regarding these documents should direct those questions to their State’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).


the second part is that i do have to get the car inspected by a DMV official who only deals with cars from overseas


Modified by celm at 10:04 PM 3/25/2007

Modified by celm at 10:10 PM 3/25/2007

USsil80

Offline

1675 posts

minot nd
9-7-2003

 « Re: (celm)


yes that is for cars in the states... all imported items have to be declared and released by customs... as far as my knowledge goes... so the vehicle would have to be released through a federal agency to get into the states
celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (USsil80)


everything has to go threw customs,just because u bring a RHD RX7 in. and it has crash test BS doesnt mean SH&T,it doesnt make it any easyer to import it.

you never imported a car,so what grounds do you have.and i dont want to hear the " i read it on the internet "

USsil80

Offline

1675 posts

minot nd
9-7-2003

 « 


so you are imprting and selling the r33 year 1996-1998..dates could be wrong but limited to the short span.. according to the nhtsa that is the only vechical able to be imprted into the usa..the docket number is posted all over this thread if you want to read the internet
celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (USsil80)


Quote, originally posted by USsil80 »
so you are imprting and selling the r33 year 1996-1998..dates could be wrong but limited to the short span.. according to the nhtsa that is the only vechical able to be imprted into the usa..the docket number is posted all over this thread if you want to read the internet

not to be rude but you are clueless and i do have a 95 GTR33 for sale.titled and state side

USsil80

Offline

1675 posts

minot nd
9-7-2003

 « 


ok so mybe exuse my ideas alittle not trying to be rude ... wife said i can get a skyline when i get out the service in 2 years so i really want people to imort them and legalize them- but what from what you said and the way i understand your cars will only be legal in the state you regester them... am i understanding you right
celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (USsil80)


Quote, originally posted by USsil80 »
- but what from what you said and the way i understand your cars will only be legal in the state you regester them... am i understanding you right

im not trying to jump down your neck,im sory for being on teh defensive.but no my cars can be transfered to other states.CA is questionable
AZhitman
CEO



Offline

49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002

 « Re: (celm)


Quote, originally posted by celm »

incorrect!!! it doesnt make it easyer if the car your importing has a US counter part.

It MOST CERTAINLY does.

I'll not be doing your research for you, but it's all in the links I provided...



Project G35 Coupe For Sale

TEAM NICO: 137,000 Nissan enthusiasts strong.

NICOclub on Facebook

AZhitman on MySpace

Love it here? Add a link to NICOclub to your site!

This site dedicated to the memory of Stacey Lynn Childs 1970-2007

AZhitman
CEO



Offline

49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002

 « Re: (celm)


Quote, originally posted by celm »

not to be rude but you are clueless and i do have a 95 GTR33 for sale.titled and state side

...and it's STILL not Federalized.

He's not clueless, he was right on the money.

celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (AZhitman)


Quote, originally posted by AZhitman »

It MOST CERTAINLY does.

I'll not be doing your research for you, but it's all in the links I provided...

oh really,you bring a JDM car that has a US counter part and see what happens when when it hits port.
and what cars have you brought over??

AZhitman
CEO



Offline

49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002

 « 


"One basis for determining a motor vehicle eligible for importation is that it 1) is substantially similar to a motor vehicle of the same model year that was manufactured for sale in the United States and certified by its manufacturer as complying with all applicable FMVSS and 2) is capable of being readily altered to comply with all applicable FMVSS. See 49 U.S.C. § 30141(a)(1)(A).

Watch your tone with me, Son - I'm not one of your JDM nutswinging friends.

AZhitman
CEO



Offline

49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002

 « Re: (AZhitman)


"Our experience has shown that the safety performance of right-hand drive vehicles is not necessarily the same as that of apparently similar left-hand drive vehicles offered for sale in this country. However, we will consider the vehicles "substantially similar" if the manufacturer advises us that the right-hand drive vehicle would perform the same as the U.S.-certified left-hand drive vehicle in dynamic crash tests. "

1988 Z31 is a perfect example - It'll roll right through (VSA‑81 Eligibility).


celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (AZhitman)


Quote, originally posted by AZhitman »
"Our experience has shown that the safety performance of right-hand drive vehicles is not necessarily the same as that of apparently similar left-hand drive vehicles offered for sale in this country. However, we will consider the vehicles "substantially similar" if the manufacturer advises us that the right-hand drive vehicle would perform the same as the U.S.-certified left-hand drive vehicle in dynamic crash tests. "

1988 Z31 is a perfect example - It'll roll right through (VSA‑81 Eligibility).


im only refering to JDM RHD CARS!!not 25 years old so it wont be just drive off the boat deal.being RHD and with out a RI ,wont happen as well.and your buddy Birkmire lives in my town.hes seen the cars i imported
AZhitman
CEO



Offline

49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002

 « 


It makes it MUCH easier. That's all I'm saying.

Eliminates the need for crash-testing and such.

And "seeing" a car that's been imported means nothing to me. Seeing Federalization docs would impress me.

p.s. It's Birkmire. Doctor Birkmire, to you.

celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (AZhitman)


Quote, originally posted by AZhitman »
Doctor Birkmire, to you.

i always call him Rex when i see him

AZhitman
CEO



Offline

49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002

 « 


Yes. JDM, RHD, 1981 Z31. Look it up. Reading's good for you.

I'm not interested in the offshore disassembly cars that are coming in through Orlando, I've seen them often. Good friend of mine in Orlando used to do some reassembly of them. They're illegal, no matter how you slice it.

celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (AZhitman)


Quote, originally posted by AZhitman »
Yes. JDM, RHD, 1981 Z31. Look it up. Reading's good for you.

I'm not interested in the offshore disassembly cars that are coming in through Orlando, I've seen them often. Good friend of mine in Orlando used to do some reassembly of them. They're illegal, no matter how you slice it.

you wrote 1988 up top there buddy,and i dont take my cars apart

AZhitman
CEO



Offline

49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002

 « 


Sorry, typo. Meant 88.

Frank, I don't care WHAT you do with them, they're not Federally legal. THat's ALL I'm saying.

There's a hundred other guys telling people the SAME thing you are - it's nothing new, it's nothing unique - Hell, there's a guy here in AZ doing the same gig.

They are NOT cars that one can drive around without being nervous. Period.

son of krypton

Offline

4 posts

Ca
8-30-2006

 « Re: (AZhitman)


Would anyone who has a legal Skyline be able to show pictures of the legal documents? You can blackout any essential personal information. I don't know if asking this is out of line or not. I would just like to see what these documents look like as I have never seen them before. Also, a person trying to buy a legal Skyline would be able to have some idea of what the documents looked like, being able to decern from fakes. If it's not possible, would someone direct me as to where I can find sample documents? Thanks in advance.
Gold Digger
RB/Skyline Moderator



Offline

5845 posts
1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec Midnight Purple 50cc Honda Zoomer
Somewhere across the pond
4-11-2004

 « Re: (son of krypton)


Quote, originally posted by son of krypton »
Would anyone who has a legal Skyline be able to show pictures of the legal documents? You can blackout any essential personal information. I don't know if asking this is out of line or not. I would just like to see what these documents look like as I have never seen them before. Also, a person trying to buy a legal Skyline would be able to have some idea of what the documents looked like, being able to decern from fakes. If it's not possible, would someone direct me as to where I can find sample documents? Thanks in advance.


Here, check this thread.

http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread/234745

He has pictures of all his documents that would be included with a legal Skyline. He is selling it, so you might want to contact him.

Laters,
-Neal

son of krypton

Offline

4 posts

Ca
8-30-2006

 « Re: (C33LaurelRacer)


Thank you. I checked out that thread before. I downloaded the image of the NHSTA document and zoomed in to take a better look. I was not sure if that was the actual document. Is a DOT/NHSTA bond release document the actual thing I should be looking out for? I guess what I'm asking is. . .Does this document mean it's DOT/NHSTA approved? ( I understand a certificate of title will probably look similar for every state.)

Would these two documents be the only documents all one would need? (Sorry about the newbie question.) These two documents are all the seller has, having posted replies by administrators of the forum supporting and seemingly confirming it's authenticity (turned into a sticky).

turtle600rr

Offline

70 posts

garden grove ca
8-19-2005

 « Re: (AZhitman)


Quote, originally posted by AZhitman »
Sorry, typo. Meant 88.

Frank, I don't care WHAT you do with them, they're not Federally legal. THat's ALL I'm saying.

There's a hundred other guys telling people the SAME thing you are - it's nothing new, it's nothing unique - Hell, there's a guy here in AZ doing the same gig.

They are NOT cars that one can drive around without being nervous. Period.

hey azhitman, i got a R32 GTS-T already here in the states but its probably gonna sell fast... its gun metal and its clean. hit me up and ill give you the price california registered




Count Zero



Offline

354 posts
1990 Skyline GT-R, Federal Legal & fully registered.
St. Louis MO
11-23-2006

 « 


Is it a Motorex car?

99% of the time "State Titled" and "State Registered" translates to "Illegally imported and titled as kit car, despite the fact that the NHTSA flat out lists the Skyline as *not* a kit car."

celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (Count Zero)


dude if u dont know how to title these cars please dont comment on it.cause your 100% wrong,KIT CAR.i would love to slap the person who first use that phrase on the forums
Count Zero



Offline

354 posts
1990 Skyline GT-R, Federal Legal & fully registered.
St. Louis MO
11-23-2006

 « 


*shrug*
Suit yourself......call the NHTSA and ask them.
celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (Count Zero)


Quote, originally posted by Count Zero »
*shrug*
Suit yourself......call the NHTSA and ask them.

I'm implying that your wrong,99% of these cars are titled for what they are.No "assembled from parts" or "rebuild" for forum educated people there terminology is "KIT CAR". i would take one of my state titled cars over a MX car any day.at least i didn't have to fraud the govt saying my car was modded to comply but it wasn't.i take my cars to the state DOT office and the inspector who only deals with cars from overseas does his inspection and if it passes,its titled. And yes they know what these cars are!!

oh and my favorit little phrase from the NHTSA

NHTSA is not responsible for regulating the operation of motor vehicles on public roads in the U.S. or for titling or registering motor vehicles for such operation. That is instead the responsibility of the individual States. Some States may require a manufacturer's certificate of origin (MCO) or manufacturer's statement of origin (MSO) to register a new motor vehicle.

AZhitman
CEO



Offline

49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002

 « 


They're state-legal, Frank. They're NOT Federalized. Period.

Get in an accident with one and see what happens. Make an insurance claim and see what happens. Hit someone with a good attorney and see what happens.

Florida is one of the MOST lenient states for titling imported cars, their inspectors SUCK and everyone knows it... Trust me, if and when I pick up an R32, it'll come from Florida.

That last phrase just means it's up to the States to title and register vehicles. It doesn't state that the Feds give up their right to impound a non-Federalized vehicle.

I LOL at everyone acting like this is some big "secret". Finding a moron at the DMV doesn't make you a Registered Importer. Just means you pulled one over on "The Man".

celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (AZhitman)


Quote, originally posted by AZhitman »
They're state-legal, Frank. They're NOT Federalized. Period.

Get in an accident with one and see what happens. Make an insurance claim and see what happens. Hit someone with a good attorney and see what happens.

Florida is one of the MOST lenient states for titling imported cars, their inspectors SUCK and everyone knows it... Trust me, if and when I pick up an R32, it'll come from Florida.

That last phrase just means it's up to the States to title and register vehicles. It doesn't state that the Feds give up their right to impound a non-Federalized vehicle.

I LOL at everyone acting like this is some big "secret". Finding a moron at the DMV doesn't make you a Registered Importer. Just means you pulled one over on "The Man".

again your chaging the subject... i wasnt talking about federal B.S. i was talking about someone assuming just because a car was titled by a state then it was titled as forums lingo Kit Car.and what you talking about man,you state is a million times easyer then mine!!!.the guy i know in your state doent even need the car there. The FDOT wont even look at my car unless my paperwork is in order and approved.and again i see you dont like to read before posting.These guys know what these cars are...there only job with teh state has to deal with inspecting and approving non-us cars!!

Gold Digger
RB/Skyline Moderator



Offline

5845 posts
1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec Midnight Purple 50cc Honda Zoomer
Somewhere across the pond
4-11-2004

 « Re: (celm)


Frank (celm) and Jon (turtle)

Does it even bother you one bit that you are selling cars to people that aren't even legal? I don't care what you say, "Oh, it's state legal and here is what the NHTSA says..." blah, blah, blah.

You are getting money from someone who is trusting you to get a car that they want. If they are like, "I don't care if it's not 'Legal', just get me one", dosen't it get on your conscience just a little bit?

I couldn't do that to someone, you know, take thousands of dollars and say, "here ya go, pal, best of luck", which, in a sense, is what you are doing.

I guess if you are ok with it, who am I to argue with you.

AZhitman
CEO



Offline

49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002

 « Re: (celm)


Quote, originally posted by celm »

again your chaging the subject... i wasnt talking about federal B.S. i was talking about someone assuming just because a car was titled by a state then it was titled as forums lingo Kit Car.and what you talking about man,you state is a million times easyer then mine!!!.the guy i know in your state doent even need the car there. The FDOT wont even look at my car unless my paperwork is in order and approved.and again i see you dont like to read before posting.These guys know what these cars are...there only job with teh state has to deal with inspecting and approving non-us cars!!

No, I'm keeping the discussion RELEVANT.

My reading skills are just fine, and I communicate VERY clearly in writing.

I'm a little more educated on this topic than you're aware of, and I'm taking responsibility for making sure none of our "less educated" members get screwed.

My state is NOT "a million times easier" to register a non-Federalized imported vehicle - You have NO idea what you're talking about, Frank.

p.s. So far, every guy in AZ doing this stuff has been laughed out of town, and the current one is well on his way to being shut down.

Count Zero



Offline

354 posts
1990 Skyline GT-R, Federal Legal & fully registered.
St. Louis MO
11-23-2006

 « 


To link the quote you love to throw out, look ABOVE it as to what the NHTSA considers a "motor vehicle" that "to be imported free of restriction, a motor vehicle less than 25 years old must be originally manufactured to comply with all applicable FMVSS and bear a label certifying such compliance that is permanently affixed by the vehcile's original manufacturer."

http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/....html

Skylines, sadly, do NOT meet that criteria.

And here's the complete list of eligible non-conforming vehicles ("By or through a Registered Importer")
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/...b.htm
Scroll down to NISSAN and it lists ONLY the 96-99 R33 models.


And since you hate the term "kit car" (But I bet you have no problem calling that thing that holds the bullets in a gun a "clip", despite it being just as "wrong"), how about your FL definition of "Custom built"

Because, unless you have a fully certified NHTSA-approved converted R33, how else do you title and register a Skyline, but their annoyingly ambiguous "custom body kit on a vehicle" registration?

AZhitman
CEO



Offline

49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002

 « Re: (celm)


Quote, originally posted by celm »
i dont take my cars apart

Really? Interesting. Not what I hear from those who know you in Orlando...

Even if they're NOT disassembled, then they're coming through Customs on FALSE pretenses (track / show use only). So, they're here illegally.

"Custom Built"means the rules are being circumvented as well. To qualify, the car may NEVER have been mass-produced for purchase. That eliminates the Skyline from eligibility.

Again, for the 99th time:

I can afford a nice Skyline. I can write it off as a "business expense". I have law enforcement connections, and DMV connections. I can afford to put a stated-value policy on it.

I don't like the idea of having to look over my shoulder all the time....

USsil80

Offline

1675 posts

minot nd
9-7-2003

 « 


i have read through alot of the documents about importing a skyline.. if you could just find that confidental document that said how motorex did a couple thing and then it would be great.. the company jk tech. did the work and that don't live to far from where i am from in maryland... mybe i should just drop in and talk to them... then i would have a 100% legal skyline...
celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (Count Zero)


Quote, originally posted by Count Zero »

And since you hate the term "kit car" (But I bet you have no problem calling that thing that holds the bullets in a gun a "clip", despite it being just as "wrong"), how about your FL definition of "Custom built"

Because, unless you have a fully certified NHTSA-approved converted R33, how else do you title and register a Skyline, but their annoyingly ambiguous "custom body kit on a vehicle" registration?

my titles are all clean and clear.they dont mention ASPT,rebuild,salvage or what ever terms are used. They tell the correct vin,make and even previous title state.and in that box it say "OS" for over seas

Count Zero



Offline

354 posts
1990 Skyline GT-R, Federal Legal & fully registered.
St. Louis MO
11-23-2006

 « 


How were the cars brought in?
As an entire car, or in pieces and then re-assembled?

We all know FL is horribly lax about checking if a car has been imported and converted properly.

What we're saying is this: Per NHSTA, the only cars that have been legally converted and thus are federally approved to be here and on the roads are the Motorex cars. Sad, but true.

Anyone can get a title on a car, especially in Florida.

celm

Offline

172 posts

oviedo fl
6-19-2006

 « Re: (Count Zero)


Quote, originally posted by Count Zero »

Anyone can get a title on a car, especially in Florida.

come here and try it,and when you cant get it done.i will be happy to charge you a stupid amount to get it done

i done it many time and i enjoy it everytime

Modified by celm at 6:17 PM 4/7/2007

 First  < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >  Last

» Return to GTR Forum / Skyline Forum
Forum Jump
Quick Reply

Powered by ZeroForum 2.4.0. ©2008 RelyNet, Inc.



< Contact Us - NICO >

Visit G37Driver.com for Infiniti G37 Information
NICOclub's Nissan forums and Infiniti forums and all affiliated sites are the property of HDS Holdings, Inc. They are independent publications and are not affiliated with or endorsed by Nissan Motor Company or Nissan North America.

Information © Copyright © 2000-2009 by NICOclub
All rights reserved. Material may not be copied or reprinted without written permission.
Visit 370zclub.org for Nissan 370z Information

Google
Web NICOclub.com

Nissan Sport Magazine Forums
Nissan Infiniti Events and Shows Nissan Infiniti Road Tests and Reviews
Nissan Infiniti Related Articles Nissan Infiniti Technical Information Articles
Nissan Financing Advice Nissan Infiniti News Archive
240sx performance modification articles and information Nissan performance and modification
Infiniti performance and modification Nissan Infiniti Car Owners Homepage
Nissan Infiniti Parts Marketplace


Nissan Infiniti Links


Do NOT copy content, plagiarism will be detected by Copyscape.

The web's most active Nissan forum !

Home Photography Camera Information and Help

Racing maps and locations