What do you guys think? Do our cars look better with or without roof racks?

Roof Racks (53%, 7 votes)

No Roof Racks (46%, 6 votes)

No Roof Rack = Sporty G35 wagon on heels.

I don`t think you can add roof rack if your car didn`t come with it

originally.

If you are into more sporty or performance side, then I think no roof rack is

the answer. I remember one time I parked next to a Mustang Cobra w/

stripes in a parking lot oF SAMSCLUB and a 50+ year old guy asked me

how many horses my EX35 has. I told him close to 300HP and this is

actually an AWD CROSSoVER - not a sports performance car like he has.

I was still seating inside the car when he approached me and I was with

my wife and 6 yr old son. I don`t know if he would approach me the same

way if my EX35 has ROOF RACK

Modified by AWGD8 at 7:19 PM 6/28/2009

AFTERMATH :

1- MORE FUEL CONSUMPTION

2- LESS POWER

3- DESTROY THE AERODYNAMICS SHAPE OF THE CAR

4- IT LOOKS UGLY ANY WAY AND PEOPLE WILL MISTAKE YOU FOR AN FX

after all its your call and your car you know what i say buy what you really want never mind people

To tell you the truth, I don't see any difference in performance or gas milage with the rack on or off, which surprised me.

With a roof rack and performance winter tires, I still got my EX driving really fast. However it always seems to take lots of gas, roof rack, winter tires or not.

I for one, like the Aluminum Trim on top.

Each his own, I guess.

At the time we bought it, we didn't know it was an option to order it with OR without.

My other Vehicle...
2003 GMC Sierra Denali
w/AWD & QuadraSteer.

4 = opinion..some people like the look