What years should I look up for differences? I'm still interested in what I saw, the front end had the sat back headlights... let's just see if this guy lets it go. But what are the differences?evildky wrote:if it's a 280ZX then it's an S130 and looks nothing like an S30
WTF? Are you trolling or just retarted?peanut2 wrote:the 280s rememnd me of those old camaros with the nitro
it's very easy to build the n/a for n/a power, or to swap int he turboBadQ45t wrote:Unless it is a turbo 280ZX I'd pass. The 81-83 were very gutless and handled like crap. The non-turbo was only 140hp and while you can make the handle okay with new springs, shocks/struts, sway bars, bushings, etc overall not the greatest.
If the car is a turbo than that is different, with 180 HP and easy ways to crank that up higher it is more interesting. If not stay witht the Z31 which had a much better suspension design (especially the rear) and much more power out of the stock NA motors.
1979-80 were the weaker engines. Same horsepower as the 280Z and almost the same weight. 1981-83 had higher compression and more power although most had full power options and weighed a bit more. They're hardly slower in the quarter mile than a 280Z; nothing worth saying that its gutless unless you're admitting that a 280Z is as well.BadQ45t wrote:Unless it is a turbo 280ZX I'd pass. The 81-83 were very gutless and handled like crap. The non-turbo was only 140hp and while you can make the handle okay with new springs, shocks/struts, sway bars, bushings, etc overall not the greatest.