neverlift wrote:not sure how my methods are less reliable or less thought out, WD I mean really if your fmu adds 64 psi of fuel pressure how is that better than only adding 30psi? please explain to me, because 100psi is a **** ton of stress. In comparison. I mean if thats the case to just toss more fuel pressure on it, I could IN THEORY turn my stock 270cc injectors into mamoth 409cc killers .... already proven they will handle steady 70psi with ten psi on top of that from boost, 7k miles and the motor blew due to no ait sensor,10psi,cold,redline. NOT fueling issues. That isnt reliable IDK what is from a 300 dollar turbo setup.
I wasn't singling you out at all man. Believe me, you'd know if I was. I would have changed your title to water head or something...lol.
I was simply referring to the fact that the methods I have suggested have literally been used 1000's of times. Turbonetics used to include the FMU with there kit back in the day. So have many other well know distributors and DIY guys over the last 10 years.
70PSI of constant static pressure isn't something I would recommend, not that I haven't also done this. But what you and I do ourselves is far different from something I'll tell a lamen to do.
The FMU works well, simply can't argue with that. It's $110 to call your low boost fuel needs done...hard to argue.
But in the end, "220...221...whatever it takes"