Nissan Forums | Infiniti Forums NICOclub staff, History and Advertising eMail NICOclub Webmaster Advertising on NICOclub Nissan forums
 
          

Active Topics

Quick Reply  Print  Email  Subscribe RSS  Help
 What's your ideal wheel size for a 'vert?First  1 2 >  Last
Author Post
whitelines13

Offline

27 posts
95maxima.se,96altima.se,93se s13,93 S13BASE,90hatch,94vert,91d21 hardbody
MIAMI FL
12-19-2005

  WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ?


So what is it ..17" or maybe 18" ..got any pics with wheels on a vert .thanks
JSvert240sx

Offline

259 posts
1993 Nissan 240SX Convertable
Boston Ma
1-19-2006

 « Re: WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ? (whitelines13)


mine with 18's:

I felt there really wasn't enough tire on them, and plan on switchin to 17's



-John-
1993 240SX Convertible

adrians_s13
Moderator



Offline

16532 posts
driving a swapped 240 is worse than drug traffic
Long Beach CA
6-29-2005

 « Re: WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ? (JSvert240sx)


i dont think s13's should go bigger than 17's.. just my opinion



Snoop with a 510?

Quote, originally posted by idahotuner »
WAHT DOES THIS FAP MEAN

Quote, originally posted by Razi »
Sometimes I push it closed with my butt.


Rey78



Offline

25 posts
S13 Truck conversion (coming soon) & s13 sil-vertible
Spring Hill Florida
3-31-2005

 « Re: WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ? (whitelines13)


On 1 car, I've got:
18x9.5 with 275x35x18 REARS
18x8.5f with 225x40x18 FRONTS
Only modification is I had the rear 1/4s rolled with an Eastwood tool

On the other car I have:
19x9.5 with 255x35x19 ALL AROUND (Time Attack Style)
The modifications include:
Custom METAL wide body (Skyline/WRX style)

Pretty much, anything goes

Schnorchel



Offline

88 posts
240SX Convertible
Stuttgart Germany
7-4-2006

 « Re: WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ? (Rey78)


Hi, you got pix from this one?
18x9.5 with 275x35x18 REARS
18x8.5f with 225x40x18 FRONTS

Thats what I want to buy, what offset?




94_240sx
'Vert Encyclopedia

Online

5557 posts
94_240SX
TX
2-28-2005

 « Re: WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ? (whitelines13)


Quote, originally posted by whitelines13 »
So what is it ..17" or maybe 18" ..got any pics with wheels on a vert .thanks

Vert has a sleek & slim profile, so I think 17s look best. You know what I mean? I think most vert guys who go for aftermarket rims get 17s.

This car has 17x7...
http://forums.nicoclub.com/zer...01864

madcowvert



Offline

1088 posts

miami fl
1-5-2006

 « Re: WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ? (94_240sx)


imo 17's




BOOMSHAKALAKA

Offline

5608 posts

Hell
6-23-2006

 « Re: WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ? (madcowvert)


I was originally going for 16's but I will be getting 17's instead.



1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited-Daily driver
1994 Nissan 240SX SE convertible-Stock and slow
whitelines13

Offline

27 posts
95maxima.se,96altima.se,93se s13,93 S13BASE,90hatch,94vert,91d21 hardbody
MIAMI FL
12-19-2005

 « Re: WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ? (topless94)


Thanks for the input so far guy's ..without a question ""madcows"" car looks spectacular with the stagard work's he's got on it ..by the way i wanted to thank him for giving me a hand on fixi'n my guage cluster problem ..big time thanks anthony ....'runs like a charm now"
94_240sx
'Vert Encyclopedia

Online

5557 posts
94_240SX
TX
2-28-2005

 « Re: WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ? (topless94)


Quote, originally posted by topless94 »
I was originally going for 16's but I will be getting 17's instead.

16s look smaller and 17s will also work better if you drop your car because 16s will go lower more... which is not good sometimes.

BOOMSHAKALAKA

Offline

5608 posts

Hell
6-23-2006

 « Re: WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ? (94_240sx)


Quote, originally posted by 94_240sx »

16s look smaller and 17s will also work better if you drop your car because 16s will go lower more... which is not good sometimes.


madcowvert



Offline

1088 posts

miami fl
1-5-2006

 « Re: WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ? (94_240sx)


Quote, originally posted by 94_240sx »

16s look smaller and 17s will also work better if you drop your car because 16s will go lower more... which is not good sometimes.

+1 on the ness i think a S13 on 16's looks fine...

my car on 17's

my old 17's

Quote, originally posted by whitelines13 »
Thanks for the input so far guy's ..without a question ""madcows"" car looks spectacular with the stagard work's he's got on it ..by the way i wanted to thank him for giving me a hand on fixi'n my guage cluster problem ..big time thanks anthony ....'runs like a charm now"

your welcome man i just gald we got it working....



Eikon
Super Moderator



Offline

6895 posts
'92 240sx 'vert with RB20
hidden
4-24-2004

 « Re: WHATS YOUR IDEAL WHEEL SIZE FOR A VERT ? (madcowvert)


my car on 18's. Just needs to be lowered. 18's are a little big for the car... but not bad. 19's might be over the line for size..





http://www.240sxconvertible.com - The internet's only 240sx 'vert site!

Joshua 1:9 "Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be terrified; do not be discouraged, for the LORD your God will be with you wherever you go."

slownslurious

Offline

1522 posts

M burg WV
6-1-2005

 « 


17x9 +27 for the front is the max I'd do on stock fenders and anything near a decent ride height. for the rears you can stuff 17x10 +29 or so. roll the lips all around, it will look good.



Wangan with my wang out.
krash



Offline

436 posts
1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible (W.I.P.)
Silver Spring MD
4-11-2005

 « 


yo topless is that "240sx" avatar pic my pic? cuz if it is i feel like a cool photographer person haha




Bored? check out my DevArt: krash51491.deviantart.com/

BOOMSHAKALAKA

Offline

5608 posts

Hell
6-23-2006

 « Re: (krash14)


haha yea it is...hope you didn't mind or anything. I really liked how you took the pic and decided to add my own touches to it.
krash



Offline

436 posts
1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible (W.I.P.)
Silver Spring MD
4-11-2005

 « 


naw its cool. like i said, i feel like a cool photographer person now lol

TIMELSS_vert

Offline

467 posts

Tampa FL
5-25-2006

 « 


depends, 18s are needed if you are going to kit the car, but if you are going to keep stock body, or a simple lip thensick nasty 16's maybe 17's, but thats just the ricer side talk :D





So_Chem - true japanese auto enthusiasts!
http://www.JDMDreams.net
BOOMSHAKALAKA

Offline

5608 posts

Hell
6-23-2006

 « Re: (TIMELSS_vert)


I'm going to be getting a kit from Version: Select or Origin later on. I'm still probably going to get 17's.

Attachment: neko4.jpg (201149 bytes, downloaded 1301 times)



BOOMSHAKALAKA

Offline

5608 posts

Hell
6-23-2006

 « Re: (topless94)


.

Attachment: photo1.jpg (54381 bytes, downloaded 1216 times)



jrsink



Offline

532 posts

tampa fl
3-16-2005

 « Re: (topless94)


its all about coilovers (suspension)...well, and sidewall size too.
around here everybody has 18 on their 240 in tampa now, but i think the best s13's have 15's on em dropped to hell! i have 16x7 but no suspension...



Team Race Bread- RB26dett. The best thing since sliced bread!


94_240sx
'Vert Encyclopedia

Online

5557 posts
94_240SX
TX
2-28-2005

 « Re: (topless94)


Quote, originally posted by topless94 »
I'm going to be getting a kit from Version: Select or Origin later on. I'm still probably going to get 17's.

The thing is Version Select or Origin kits are bit wild, so you should get massive 18s, otherwise your car will end up looking like this.

Attachment: neko17-05.jpg (65707 bytes, downloaded 1127 times)




BOOMSHAKALAKA

Offline

5608 posts

Hell
6-23-2006

 « Re: (94_240sx)


Quote, originally posted by 94_240sx »

The thing is Version Select or Origin kits are bit wild, so you should get massive 18s, otherwise your car will end up looking like this.

True...ill probabnly get the wheel setup of the ones I posted earlier...BTW what are they? I mean the offsets?

94_240sx
'Vert Encyclopedia

Online

5557 posts
94_240SX
TX
2-28-2005

 « Re: (topless94)


Quote, originally posted by topless94 »

True...ill probabnly get the wheel setup of the ones I posted earlier...BTW what are they? I mean the offsets?

FNs have 18x8.5 and 18x9.5 and buch of different offsets.

http://www.splparts.com/Parts/...t.htm

You have to do some research and know what you want to do like staggered setup, stretched tires...etc. But before that... IMO you don't want to put too wild bodykit on the vert. Since we don't have hardtop, it looks kinda weird with having fat bottom. You know what I mean? I rather go for subtle/mild bodykit and keep the car's slim looking. Besides if you want 18s, 5 lug conversion is like 95% required and your brakes will look tiny inside of wheel. If not, there's a chance you can find a good set of 17 inch 4 lug rims.

BTW, you can see how neko punch's car has been transformed here.

http://www.northwestnissans.com/test/nekopunch/


BOOMSHAKALAKA

Offline

5608 posts

Hell
6-23-2006

 « Re: (94_240sx)


Quote, originally posted by 94_240sx »

You have to do some research and know what you want to do like staggered setup, stretched tires...etc. But before that... IMO you don't want to put too wild bodykit on the vert. Since we don't have hardtop, it looks kinda weird with having fat bottom. You know what I mean? I rather go for subtle/mild bodykit and keep the car's slim looking. Besides if you want 18s, 5 lug conversion is like 95% required and your brakes will look tiny inside of wheel. If not, there's a chance you can find a good set of 17 inch 4 lug rims.

Yea lately I've been looking into all that stuff because you can't just say "hey im gonna put 18's on my ride and it'll look good." I realized there's more to it than that. As for the bodykit, you're right...i'm still looking around...it doesn't need anything too extravagant, something simple. I was hopeing somebody could photoshop those pics for me so I could see how it would look on a convertible. And i'm gonna do a 5 lug conversion later on.

cheap_sticker05

Offline

120 posts
1994 Nissan 240sx VERT! 1995 240sx
Orlando FL
3-30-2005

 « 


I am running a 18x9+20 fr and 18x10+12 rear. It is a little extreme for my taste, but it looks good. I plan on buying some grenades for the vert and switching the wheels I have on my vert to my s14 since they look better on there.
BOOMSHAKALAKA

Offline

5608 posts

Hell
6-23-2006

 « Re: (cheap_sticker05)


Quote, originally posted by cheap_sticker05 »
I am running a 18x9+20 fr and 18x10+12 rear. It is a little extreme for my taste, but it looks good. I plan on buying some grenades for the vert and switching the wheels I have on my vert to my s14 since they look better on there.

Be sure to post pics of how it looks.

DeXteR
Picture Police



Offline

2167 posts
93 sil40 vert- RIP 93 240sx vert- 94 pathfinder se v-6 4x4
Hemlock MI
9-26-2005

 « 


here's my vert with sportmax 962's:

sorry my ugly mug has to be in it. it's the best picture i could find with the wheels.

anyways 17x7 in front wrapped with 205/45-17 and 17x9 in rear wrapped with 255/40-17. i love them except i wish the fronts had a deeper offset.



Come vote for the 2009 Nico 240sxCONVERTIBLE.com calendar!

BOOMSHAKALAKA

Offline

5608 posts

Hell
6-23-2006

 « Re: (DeXteR)


^ Hey those look pretty good. You are right though about the front needing a deeper offset. All you needed were some coilovers.
DeXteR
Picture Police



Offline

2167 posts
93 sil40 vert- RIP 93 240sx vert- 94 pathfinder se v-6 4x4
Hemlock MI
9-26-2005

 « Re: (topless94)


yeah that picture was pre-suicidal deer (actually that was on my and my wife's honeymoon.... i had a lot of plans for modifying the vert including coil-overs, but now i need to start all over.
BOOMSHAKALAKA

Offline

5608 posts

Hell
6-23-2006

 « Re: (DeXteR)


There's a vert out there waiting to be sold so don't sweat it.
jrsink



Offline

532 posts

tampa fl
3-16-2005

 « Re: (topless94)


15x10s all the way around FTW!

Attachment: 1.jpg (395042 bytes, downloaded 1053 times)



jrsink



Offline

532 posts

tampa fl
3-16-2005

 « Re: (jrsink)


Quote, originally posted by jrsink »
15x10s all the way around FTW!

this is actually a pic of 15x8 and 15x10;
same design though, custom wheels! 4 inches of backspacing with over fenders all the way...YOU KNOW U WANT IT!
coming in january

nismofly
Moderator



Offline

13470 posts
89 S13 Hatch
Syracuse / Shirley NY
9-4-2004

 « 


no more than a 17 in front...18s in front dont work on an s13 if you want a kit to fit right

you could either do 17s all around or a 17/18 stagger




ca18datsun510

Offline

1975 posts
bmw 330i zhp, 91 infiniti m30, 89 240sx, 07 zx6r, 05 trx450r
brewster ny
8-31-2002

 « 


17x9's on the rear 16's on the front.






http://www.myspace.com/15182468

m30 build up.
http://forums.nicoclub.com/zeropost
one ton garage
NICO Sponsor

Offline

413 posts
'66 Fairlady Roadster, '94 Q45t, '93 240SX Convertible, '91 Previa
Sunnyvale, CA
6-18-2004

 « 


"Ideal" is pretty subjective... as different people have drastically different tastes... but for me personally, on 240s with kits (esp. more extreme ones), you will want a min of 18s all around. I've actually come to realize that the ideal setup imo is an 18/19 on an S13....that's with or w/o a kit, though I've been able to get a friend's 19/19 setup to look pretty balanced overall imo (pre-bodykit). With a 19/19, it's tricky to juggle the best fitment wheels, stretched tires, ride height, neg camber all around, and ultimately, the bodykit. With that said though, I'm also going to end up running a 19/19 on my conv, just cuz in all honesty, once you see an s13 with a well-configured set of big wheels, it's really hard to go back...!



"THINK"
www.onetongarage.com

slownslurious

Offline

1522 posts

M burg WV
6-1-2005

 « 


the world is filled with S13's with way too much rear wheel/tire though. staggered diameter is silly since the rears generallly need less wheel than the front for brake clearance. If youre running anything larger than a 17 you better have some massive *** brakes to justify it. otherwise its just more unsprung weight and intertia to overcome.
and a staggered width is silly because it tends to increase oversteer. Unless youre all out drag of course, but if thats the case you probably have a seperate set of wheels with drag radials or slicks for the track, so its a moot point.
one ton garage
NICO Sponsor

Offline

413 posts
'66 Fairlady Roadster, '94 Q45t, '93 240SX Convertible, '91 Previa
Sunnyvale, CA
6-18-2004

 « 


actually from an aesthetic pov, a larger diameter rear wheel usually helps most modern cars look more "even." This is usually because the rear fender height of most cars is greater than the front fender height (i.e. the rear wheelwell opening is lower, while the front is higher, of course for steering clearance), which effectively "pushes" the rear wheel down visually, making it appear smaller than the front wheels. It's not as bad in 240s as lots of other cars... but for a good example, off the top of my head, check out profile pics of the last-generation lexus IS300s... and notice how the rear wheels always just visually appear quite a bit smaller than the fronts. And of course this all applies to the aesthetics of the car... you figure 90%+ of your car's driving is just toting around town, so utmost performance could probably take a little back seat to aesthetics. And if you do track your car (which should be the only place you truly push a car to a point where minor wheel/tire changes make dramatic differences), then you could get track wheels/tires just for that express purpose. otherwise, it's all about having a car that looks nice for the other 90% of the time.
ca18datsun510

Offline

1975 posts
bmw 330i zhp, 91 infiniti m30, 89 240sx, 07 zx6r, 05 trx450r
brewster ny
8-31-2002

 « Re: (slownslurious)


Quote, originally posted by slownslurious »

staggered width is silly because it tends to increase oversteer. moot


under steer.

carcrazyguy

Offline

285 posts
90,92 240 / 90 Z32 / 94 Q45
Tri Cities TN
1-3-2006

 « Re: (slownslurious)


Quote, originally posted by slownslurious »
the world is filled with S13's with way too much rear wheel/tire though. staggered diameter is silly since the rears generallly need less wheel than the front for brake clearance. If youre running anything larger than a 17 you better have some massive *** brakes to justify it. otherwise its just more unsprung weight and intertia to overcome.
and a staggered width is silly because it tends to increase oversteer. Unless youre all out drag of course, but if thats the case you probably have a seperate set of wheels with drag radials or slicks for the track, so its a moot point.

I totally agree, but you have to understand that it is the current (or recent) trend to stagger wheels so you will likely get a lot of arguments from people. A vert, it is already 360 lbs heavier than the coupe it is based on (according to C/D). So you might want to consider that most people are not buying their vert for the same reason one might buy, say an SE coupe S13 for example, rather they like the look foremost with a little performance on the side.

In reality, staggering was initally a band aid procedure in the old days to help muscle cars make more rear traction. Then more recently automakers used this technique to make up for rear weight bias issues with mid engine cars and traction issues on high hp cars (example, TTZX / Supra). In reality however, if and when automakers can make a sports car with the same size wheels / tires all around they will. Look at, say, a 93-95 RX7. The stock R1 had "only" 225/50 all around and recorded the highest skidpad (.99g) of any (standard) production vehicle ever recorded at that time and probably to this day. Miatas, NA 300ZX, etc...there are quite a few sports cars that could have had staggered sizes but didn't since they didn't need it.

In other words, Nissan worked their asses off to calibrate the multilink suspensions on the various vehicles that used them. Messing with the balance, particularly on a near 50/50 (hardtop) 240SX will only net mixed results and trade offs.
However most 240's are already SO off balance anyway, thanks to mixed brand suspension parts, heavy wheels, stereos, turbo conversions, and excessive lowering of the car, so why not let them stagger it, might as well. Going plus 2, 3, etc. is not going to make their car that much less of a slalom bandit.
So what I'm telling you is that most convertible 240 owners could care less about balance, a neutral chassis, or autocross, and don't drive the Dragon or the Snake but do want their car to look bad ***, which is the one thing a staggered setup does (at certain angles anyway). I understand this...and would probably do the same if that is what I wanted out of my 240's. But I still agree with you, as I am a purist.



See my 300ZX Stereo Info Page

 First  1 2 >  Last

» Return to 240SX Convertible Forum
Forum Jump