Assuming you will not have a second battery in the trunk, it does affect what type and size battery you should consider. As far as just operating your car the battery needs to be no larger than a few 15 second or so burst on your starter, but it doesn't hurt to have a little extra capacity.Nazc0 wrote:not anytime soon but why?
Does that mean if I put 30 of those in my trunk I'll have 100 more horsepower and do wheelstands?Poyzinous wrote:The factory replacement battery is a 999M1-NB35C(or MB35c or QB35c depending on location) battery. From Interstate. Good stuff. It has 550 cca and the Infiniti sticker, which by itself adds 3.6 hp to the wheels.
What Perry says. Also if you upgrade to a better audio you might use more juice out of the battery even more and drain it faster.Nazc0 wrote:not anytime soon but why?
I have have them up to 10 years on a couple of occasions. Most of the time I didn't have the car long enough to have battery problems with them. As far as the others I have had cars long enough to install and replace batteries. Interstates seem to last, not to say that there are not better battery technology, but I have not seen many which give the length of service.Tampa G35 Sedan 6MT wrote:1+ for interstate batteries... They last for ever.. The one i have in the jeep is dated May 2002 But it is also on its way out...
The Fla Weather is so damn hot that we can only get 3 years out of a battery down here. I have had the jeep for 2 summers and it has killed the battery!
DJ
When sitting still. The rest of the time the charging system should never allow this to occur unless you really have a large enough system to outrun the car battery. If this is the case it is best to have a second battery in the trunk (or other location) that is charged by the car and contains a blocking diode arraignment to prevent the car's battery from being discharged by the sound system.zozoka1212 wrote:
What Perry says. Also if you upgrade to a better audio you might use more juice out of the battery even more and drain it faster.
One of my instructors from school Had a rare 97 Hardbody V6 4x4, the fully loaded one, and his original battery lasted him 10 years exactly, to the month he purchased it new. That was amazing to me.pfarmer wrote:
I have have them up to 10 years on a couple of occasions.
The lack of electronics in the Jeep probably don't mean a whole bunch as the entire running draw for the 'G' is no greater than about 40 amps max, less once the battery is recharged.kmckis1029 wrote:i have a Die Hard in my jeep... its at least 4 yrs old... have left the light on over night once and car still cranked the next morning
my jeep started faster than my g35x... but since i went up to 800 cca they are on par now... but in defense of my G, the jeep has way less electronics pulling off it of course...
I don't know which Jeep you have. I had a 95 Country. I think it would come down to the starter and also how long you can run it. Most starters have a limit of a certain amount of time of crank and how many cranks in a specific time period. I think the Jeep may well require more current to start it.kmckis1029 wrote:ok but still more than the jeep...
You may have the much better battery however so you may be the one that got the deal!Nazc0 wrote:wow wish i saw that sooner i paid $79 for the battery after the $10 discount for turning in my old one
OK, here's the deal. If you are planning an audio system then going to a battery with more storage is not the proper solution. The only reason the battery would be used as power reserve with an audio system is if the system is drawing more power than the alternator can supply to the vehicle as a whole. The proper solution is to upgrade the alternator, not the battery. The larger the battery the more strain there is on the alternator in those conditions.zozoka1212 wrote:
What Perry says. Also if you upgrade to a better audio you might use more juice out of the battery even more and drain it faster.
While the alternator upgrade should be the way to go if needed, a larger battery if charged will not cause the alternator to work harder with the slight change of internal resistance. If discharged the alternator should charge at the same rate as a smaller battery. It may actually help a little if the alternator actually can supply the 'average' load to the system. This is one of the concepts of multiple batteries with a blocking diode. The blocking diode (or similar circuit concept) simply keeps the audio system from draining the main battery down to the point of compromising the operation of the vehicle.audtatious wrote:
OK, here's the deal. If you are planning an audio system then going to a battery with more storage is not the proper solution. The only reason the battery would be used as power reserve with an audio system is if the system is drawing more power than the alternator can supply to the vehicle as a whole. The proper solution is to upgrade the alternator, not the battery. The larger the battery the more strain there is on the alternator in those conditions.
Which did you get??Nazc0 wrote:wow wish i saw that sooner i paid $79 for the battery after the $10 discount for turning in my old one
The point I am making is that the charging circuit should charge at the same basic maximum rate regardless of battery size if drained. If it is not drained then the alternator will not have to work harder since the larger battery will act like a shock absorber for the transients.audtatious wrote:My response had nothing to do with general charging, just charging when upgrading a stereo system. A sub amp can easily draw 30A+ by itself which makes it easy to start sucking power from a battery when the factory alternator cannot sustain the cars load plus that of the aftermarket stereo. At that point it starts to pull from the battery and the alternator now has the additional load of supplying power to the car, the stereo and recharging the battery. This will lead to battery drain and deep cycling which will lead to battery failure and will also lead to alternator failure due to the load.
After 25+ years of working around car audio I have seen this happen over and over. Hell, if I have the factory Bose system cranked up I can feel the car surging due to the added strain of the alternator, I'd hate to know what running a 500wpc+ amp on top of it would do.
Realize I'm not talking about volts, I'm talking amps. The voltage regulator controls the number of volts that is produced (in the 13.5-14.5 volt range) and this should be regardless of whether the battery has a full charge or not. What changes is the electro-motive force that is produced by the alternator when a low-condition is met. As you use more accessories or start dipping into the battery reserve the elctro-motive force decreases which allows more amps to be sent to compensate for the additional load. There is only so many amps that the alternator can put out so once that is reached then there is no way the alternator can keep up with demands. When the alternator can't keep up with load demands the battery becomes drained and there is the possibility of the alternator itself having issues with the diode pack or regulator being damaged as well.pfarmer wrote:
The point I am making is that the charging circuit should charge at the same basic maximum rate regardless of battery size if drained. If it is not drained then the alternator will not have to work harder since the larger battery will act like a shock absorber for the transients.
Having a secondary battery can make things worse if not done properly.pfarmer wrote:The car may in fact respond in a negative way if you outrun the alternator as the battery is most likely out of the picture most of the time when the car is in operation. This is another reason for the dedicated battery in the trunk that many install with larger systems. It keeps the two systems entirely separate.
The voltage regulator keeps an eye on the battery by turning current to the field (stator) terminal of the alternator on and off. By design it should not be a constant charge to the battery.pfarmer wrote:One of the issues I see with charging systems is they do not actually 'float' the battery like they should. In this case you would always be charging the battery at a minimum rate since the battery is in the circuit at all times, the 'float' would be maybe as little as a half volt or so over the running voltage of the rest of the system depending on load.
Simply adding a second battery can make things worse unless you use a "smart" configuration which will monitor the main battery charge before allowing the secondary battery to be charged while runing (different than using battery isolators). In general, adding a secondary battery is good for allowing the owner to listen to the stereo without the car running while ensuring the main battery is not drained. While driving, the proper solution is to use the properly sized alternator.pfarmer wrote:When I did some current tests on mine the maximum amp measured to the battery was about 40 amps right after starting the car. What was interesting was checking the amps on both of the battery legs after a few minutes. The positive lead will stay up while the negative will drop to a very low number which indicates that the system is not really floating the battery. If you have a trunk mounted battery for the audio this is exactly how you would want to set it up (floating).
Perry