no mods now got plenty of plans for this babyare u saying that the itb's are gonna cost u 9k or the whole project? and by the way, pm's are disabled.DrifterBoy240 wrote:well i am going ka n/a, i am doing the itb setup i dont know what hp im going to be getting out of it but i know its gonna cost me at least 9k for what im looking at though i know of a site that has stuff for the KA n/a but i cant remember it right now i can get it to you ill pm it to you and a place that makes some cams to if you'd like.
No. They aren't. All 240s with secondary butterfly valves have the same camshafts. 240/248 adv. duration.Nismochick240 wrote:what year is ur 240? i have some 91 cams for sale if yours in 92+... they're a small upgrade

"A fast car doesn't have to be a loud car"

Do some searching? You're honestly telling me to do some searching?Nismochick240 wrote:insanity-- do some searchin 91 cams are A SMALL UPGRADE for the new ka24de's...
Well I live in Cali and can tell you what you can do.sumyunggai wrote:i was wondering what it would take (parts, ballpark cost, planning, etc.) to naturally aspirate a KA24DE to over 200 hp preferably 220whp. the car still has to be drivable as a daily driver and street legal in california. any info u have would be helpful. i'm not to specific on details yet. just throwing the idea out there to see what kind of feed back i get.
please leave ur opinions that force induction or nitros is better out of this thread. i'm looking for just the facts.

Well you need pistons to bump the CR up unless you plan to mill the head (for NA builds after market pistons use thicker rings than the stock OEM, recomend the super techs because they are coated and there price at http://www.ka24de.com were reduced by $100 in savings), I chose the super tech's for there 10.5:1 CR and I can bring it down to 10.1:1 using a slightly thicker gasket. I don't recomend milling the head because of valve clearance issues. You can use SOHC KA pistons, but I have never been able to find a gasket that would drop that CR low enough for smogable reasons, (but that would be the best budget low buck set up if you could find a gasket thick enough). If you know how to weld you can always clover leaf weld the head to bump the CR, but it takes precision and calculation to get each dome to the 10.1:1 CR.vvaffle wrote:If you have cams that move your powerband up you might want to go above 6000rpm to make the most out of it wouldn't you. Also, don't hear much about people using aftermarket pistons on NA builds. Can you go into a little why the super tech pistons over any others? One more thing, are the eagle rods availible now? I thought they were still being developed. If you do all of this, wouldn't you expect significant gains from a full exhaust system and maybe ITB's?

There is a little more planning involved than that, if you plan to pass smog emissions though. You have to take into effect chamber tempratures from raising compression, not just the type of fuel you have access too. Fuel only prevents knock and ping, it defenitely won't prevent higher chamber temps do to raising the CR. If you have to high of a CR inevetably you won't pass smog. 10.1:1 is that fine line to passing the smog test on the rollers from what I understand. If you live in a county that is only affected to idle smog checks you have a better chance of getting away with running higher CR's upto 11.1:1.vvaffle wrote:I am guessing that having access to 93 octane instead of 91 wouldn't allow you to use much higher compression at all. So if you were going to do clover leaf welding, you would have to go with something like 9.6:1 compression pistons if you planned to be on 93 octane, right? (I think I have heard that someone makes those)
| Quote, originally posted by McRussellPants » |
| Thats what you get for drifting on 15s, son. |
Yeah it will support it especially once it is ported and honed with the intake side of the head. It won't be the best for top end results, but it will defenitely be better than stock.TrueSlide wrote:Would the stock intake manifold even support that??!? Even with a larger TB wouldnt the stock intake manifold kinda hold it back from potential?