Z31toZ32 wrote:I agree that it is recommended, but isn't a higher octane nothing more than resistance to detonation? If you aren't detonating, what is the point of running higher? Can you somehow tell or measure if the knock sensor is reducing performance of the car, or is it too small of a difference to ever notice?
I have a hand me down maxima that has been in my family for the car's life, and we have never used anything besides regular 87 (generally shell) in the car.
I just am going based on my own personal experience with my I30 and my 95 Maxima, along with numerous other discussions on this topic. I don't buy it because the tag on the fuel filler door tells me so, I buy it because it's proven to make a difference and it's better for the vehicle.
Sure regular will do, but what is it saving you to run regular? I'm willing to bet that you're not getting the same fuel economy that you would from running premium, so yeah you may be saving a few bucks when you fill up, but you're not really saving much(if anything at all) over the course of that tank of fuel. I get 20-21 mpg city and 30-31 mpg highway running premium, but if I even run mid-grade, you can shave a minimum of 2-3 mpg off of those numbers.
I see your point on detonation too, but why dare to find out? I'm not that cheap and I don't drive my car gently, so i'd rather stick with what works. I can tell a noticeable difference in my car between just mid-grade and premium, so I don't want to see what regular would do for it.
Regular will do the job and I can understand if it's a hand-me-down car, but I even ran premium in my 95 Maxima and it had 200k on it when I bought it. After driving Mustangs for years and experiencing similar results between fuel grades, i've learned it's not worth it to save a few bucks and sacrifice performance. It's a 4 Door Sports Car and should be treated as such
