KimberKenobi wrote:
wait... isn't that 3???
Maybe that's why he thinks the Sentra looks better.
Or someone forgot to tell him that Altezza-style tail lights are sooooo 2001.
And it's funny how he says that a fully loaded Versa is the same price as a mid-level Sentra. Forgetting the fact that said fully loaded Versa actually has more equipment than the Sentra he's comparing it so, and that only a fully loaded Sentra (at, again nearly $4k more) has more equipment than a fully loaded Versa.
And by the time you get that high up in price, you can buy a nearly base Altima, which actually IS better looking than the Sentra (as if that's an accomplishment), has most of the same equipment, and then puts you back in almost the same interior and/or legroom class as the Versa. But minus about 6 MPG overall.
Edit 1: sorry mr. Sentra owner, but if you ignore your over-Americanized view of body styling (because it's clear that things like a Pontiac G6 would make you blow your load), and actually crunch the NUMBERS, the Versa spanks the B16 Sentra so handily that it makes people (and not just me, really) wonder why Nissan even bothers to PRODUCE the Sentra anymore.
You're the rare case where someone who looked at a Versa decided to buy the Sentra. For every person like you, there are about 5 or 6 who look at the Sentra, and said WTF? Why wouldn't I buy a Versa instead?
Edit 2: More statistics for you, from my wanderings around the city as a mobile technician. I see 20 C11x Versas for every B16 Sentra I see.
For every 10 Versas I see, 3 are rentals. I have, since the introduction of the B16 Sentra, seen only a grand total of 10 of them. 9 have been rentals, and the only NON rental I saw was an SE-R Spec V. Does that tell you something ELSE about the Sentra? As in.. the only people willing to buy them are rental companies.