Post by
boost_boy »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/boost-boy-u2853.html
Mon Mar 29, 2004 12:37 pm
Once again, there seem to be some folks that think the CA is an SR and you got another thing coming. Take a post of mine that gave real time duty cycles of a 50 lb/hr injector on the CA18DET. Max power you will squeeze out of those puppies on a 110 CID motor is around 350ish and that's pushing the injectors outside the normal duty cycle range. So what you're trying to tell me is that on a stock CA18 and GT25 series or A BIG T28 turbo, these guys are going to see 300hp? It is not just the turbo that makes these engines go, they just support it. And I guarantee you that any of those T2 small turbos on the CA18 will be straining to get anywhere near 300hp and I'm talking at the crank. Never said 300 was impossible, but who in the hell wants to be straining there precious and expensive GT turbo just to say "I got 300hp"!
Bottom line is, the performance charcteristics of the SR and the CA really needs to be kept in the closet because these two engines are nothing alike. The SR can perform below 3500rpm which is what makes it a good choice and the choice of most people whereas the CA just wakes up around 3200 which makes it (IMO) not the best choice for a street racing motor. Putting bigger cams on it only makes it worse in the fact that you'll gain more power mid and top end, but you'll lose what little bottom end power you got.
And check this out, after looking at my all my dyno sheets and comparing them to those of the ones that were posted, it proved indeed that discussing what an SR does has very little meaning in the CA forum. Ca guys should not be studying SR20DET charcteristics and dyno sheets because your CA won't be doing things like the SR and when the SR does them. Hell, you may as well buy yourself one if you're sold on it's performance because we truly own a different kind of motor.
Quote »you really think 189cc's make that much a difference?? [/quote] You're looking at the small picture, but yes I do!
Quote »u can go to the uk forum and literally pick a 300hp combo.... plug n play. S14/5 t28 is a popular ca upgrade there. Not much difference between sr and ca power figures, same mods.[/quote] I don't visit these forums or no anything about them, So I can't really say a thing about what the guys do in the UK, but it's still a T2 small with a bigger hotside and you are still going to strain it. We got guys here "pulsar_gtr" for one, that has a T3, some 50lb/hr injectors and he's hasn't crossed 300hp yet. And I know he's running up to 15-16psi of boost. And l for you boys that gots the extra loot to blow on a GT turbo, go right ahead because when it blow, I hope you got extra loot to buy another one. GT turbo on everyday, fun-having CA18s is not worth it. Like quest said, the mitsu turbos are good, but I'd personally lean towards the economical, but highly effective T3/T4 series.
On my old set up with a T3/T04B stage 1 with a .63 rear housing, the car mustered up 312.5whp and 263.9 lb/ft of torque and that was an everyday setting (no race fuel here). Now with a T3/T04E, it's more efficient, somewhat lazy and spools up about the same, but is way more responsive with the .48 housing which will choke off some HP and TQ.
Aaron, you should've built you an SR because I see the glittering love you have for it's performance. Unfortunately, your CA is bad mama-jama, but it ain't no SR and I'm not saying the SR is in any way, shape or form better than the CA, just the fact that it is a different engine. I think if we had a 2 litre CA, you may very well be singing a different note. I left my bore stoke on my built motor (1809cc or 110 CID) and I assure you, it will not be one to disappoint because of it's physical size.
Why do you think I do so much R&D on my g/f's CA, so I can back-up what I post and not post what I read someone else post about because I've most definitely seen lies posted about Hp.
Dyno tuning is one thing " A reference " . When you can tune on miles and miles of highway then your car is more subject to real time weather, temperatures and load. If you want a dyno queen, then tune your car on the dyno. If you want something you can get in and drive and enjoy as well as appreciate, then do like I do and tune it on the fly.
Lastly, too many of these SR guys have no a/c and in some cases no P/S. Isn't it true that the A/C and P/S robs you of Hp? Well, my g/f's car have both functioning/frosty A/C and some P/S to boot, so for the comfort thing, we can afford to lose some HP.
Too many variables from too many engines to compare one to the other. And this is indeed factual;) !
Dee