A picture of the wife putting her CA together would be priceless. And as for issues, I have plenty of them as well, so I know where you're coming from.themadscientist wrote:CAs suck Hopefully when I get soem personal issues taken care of I can do awriteup and picture post of the wife putting her engine together for her 180.
I think a T3/T04B/E would serve the CA just fine. I have had the ultimate success with the T3/T04B stage 1 with a .63 rear housing. I am currently using the T3/T04E variants and of course they assist in what I need them for. I used to be into topend racing (150+mph) in which now i can't do anymore due to my near death experience in 2k2 racing a Ferarri. The .48 will serve you well {trust me on this one} .c-rad wrote:Dude, I'll be at the track all the time when I put my motor in. Right now I am contemplating turbo setups... So far these are my options....
top mount manifoldT3/T04E 50-trim .48 housingTiAl 38mm wastegatecustom O2/DP
or....GT28RO2 housingDownpipe
I've been thinking the last day or so that since I need an O2 housing and a downpipe anyway, I may as well just go for the T3/T4 right out of the gate. I would worry much less about grenading a t3/t4 since they are almost half the price of a GT28R or GT2871R. Originally I was dead set on the 2871R as my choice, but the fact the supply is low and the demand is high, they are closing in on the $1200 mark! And $1200 for a turbo that cannot be rebuilt is not something I want to deal with. My only concern with the T3/T4 is response. The .48 housing shouldn't make the lag too bad... What do you guys think?
EDIT: Oh, and did I mention that topmount turbos look sexy?
I found a good deal on the 50-trim for $475 so that's what really got the wheels turning in my head... I've got 550's on the way (again) and a Z32 MAF ready to go on as well, so I should be fine to support my goal of 300-325whp. Also, I think it would be nicer to make 300whp @ 14-15psi rather than 19-20 with a turbo such as the GT28R (if it will even MAKE 300whp).boost_boy wrote: I think a T3/T04B/E would serve the CA just fine. I have had the ultimate success with the T3/T04B stage 1 with a .63 rear housing. I am currently using the T3/T04E variants and of course they assist in what I need them for. I used to be into topend racing (150+mph) in which now i can't do anymore due to my near death experience in 2k2 racing a Ferarri. The .48 will serve you well {trust me on this one} .
Dee
Not exactly a trial and error story, but in my sig, I have a link to a vid to a lap I did at Nurburgring in my CA18 powered 200sx.boost_boy wrote: If your car is up and running, get it to a track of some sort, so that we may have more compilations of performance succeses and failures.
Nah, we have manual, you might have been looking at my friends 240.biosehnsucht wrote:whoa dude europe got shafted with automatic seatbetls too? just saw the pics in the sig link to nurburgring.. lol
I swapped in some manual belts courtesy of Canada.
Well I only got one AutoX in last year--having had some "clutch" and work issues that are now resolved.boost_boy wrote: If your car is up and running, get it to a track of some sort, so that we may have more compilations of performance succeses and failures.
Dee
His motor is a FWD/AWD unit. The CA cam in the same configurations as the SR. As a matter of fact, his car came with a CA originally from factory.nocwage wrote:So you've got a RWD motor adapted to FWD?Or did you swap to a RWD TB, and is there an advantage to that over the stock top/over the engine one?
Hey NismoPlsr --Who do you AutoX with --I do not recognize the site --is that the lot Fairfield County uses?nismoplsr wrote:ive auto-xed my pulsar about 4 times last summer and im going to start up again in 2 weeks this summer
here are some pics from last year
That I already knew,boost_boy wrote:His motor is a FWD/AWD unit. The CA cam in the same configurations as the SR. As a matter of fact, his car came with a CA originally from factory.
Dee